| Literature DB >> 25006541 |
Songsak Wattanachaisaereekul1, Anuwat Tachaleat1, Juntira Punya2, Rachada Haritakun2, Chollaratt Boonlarppradab2, Supapon Cheevadhanarak3.
Abstract
Anhydromevalonolactone (AMVL) is a bioactive natural product that arises from a molecular biology technique using Aspergillus oryzae as a heterologous host. AMVL has been used as a precursor for the synthesis of insect pest control reagents and has numerous applications in the biotechnological and medical industries. In this study, the Plackett-Burman Design and the Central Composite Design, which offer efficient and feasible approaches, were complemented to screen significant parameters and identify the optimal values for maximum AMVL production. The results suggested that sucrose, NaNO3, yeast extract and K2HPO4 were the key factors affecting AMVL production in a complex medium, whereas the major components required for a defined medium were NaNO3, K2HPO4, KH2PO4 and trace elements. These factors were subsequently optimized using the response surface methodology. Under optimal conditions, a maximum AMVL production of 250 mg/L in the complex medium and 200 mg/L in the defined medium was achieved, which represents an increase of approximately 3-4-fold compared to the commonly used malt extract medium.Entities:
Keywords: Anhydromevalonolactone; Aspergillus oryzae; Central composite design; Plackett-Burman design; Response surface methodology
Year: 2014 PMID: 25006541 PMCID: PMC4077012 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-014-0052-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Figure 1Structures of anhydromevalonolactone (A) and lineatin (B).
The levels of independent variables in the Plackett-Burman Design for the complex and defined media
| | | | | |
| A | Sucrose (g/L) | 20 | 40 | 60 |
| B | NaNO3 (g/L) | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| C | Yeast extract (g/L) | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| D | KH2PO4 (g/L) | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| E | K2HPO4 (g/L) | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| F | KCl (g/L) | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1 |
| G | MgSO4.7H2O (g/L) | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1 |
| H | Trace elements (mL/L) | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1 |
| | | | | |
| I | Sucrose (g/L) | 40 | 70 | 100 |
| J | NaNO3 (g/L) | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| K | K2HPO4 (g/L) | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| L | KH2PO4 (g/L) | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| M | KCl (g/L) | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
| N | MgSO4.7H2O (g/L) | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
| O | CaCl2.2H2O (g/L) | 0 | 0.10 | 0.20 |
| P | Na3C6H5O7.2H2O (g/L) | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Q | Biotin (mL/L) | 0 | 0.10 | 0.20 |
| R | Trace elements (mL/L) | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Figure 2Effects of different carbon and nitrogen sources on AMVL production.
Experimental design using the Plackett-Burman method with AMVL production for the complex medium
| 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 161.1 ± 7.2 |
| 2 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 139.1 ± 5.3 |
| 3 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 17.6 ± 0.3 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 68.3 ± 4.7 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 50.7 ± 3.1 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| 7 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 12.4 ± 0.5 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 81.0 ± 3.6 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 123.8 ± 5.8 |
| 10 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 55.0 ± 3.2 |
| 11 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 39.2 ± 1.6 |
| 12 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80.5 ± 4.4 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86.2 ± 4.7 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81.2 ± 3.5 |
| 16 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 34.4 ± 2.0 |
| 17 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 |
| 18 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 74.8 ± 3.4 |
| 19 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 48.1 ± 2.2 |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 86.0 ± 4.1 |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 136.1 ± 5.7 |
| 22 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 80.9 ± 3.8 |
| 23 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 57.2 ± 2.3 |
| 24 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 2.4 ± 0.3 |
| 25 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 25.0 ± 0.9 |
| 26 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 44.5 ± 2.3 |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 142.9 ± 6.8 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92.8 ± 3.7 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.9 ± 2.9 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87.1 ± 3.3 |
Note: A, Sucrose; B, NaNO3; C, Yeast extract; D, KH2PO4; E, K2HPO4; F, KCl; G, MgSO4.7H2O; H, Trace elements.
Experimental design using the Plackett-Burman method with AMVL production for the defined medium
| 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 44.5 ± 2.2 |
| 2 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 57.9 ± 3.1 |
| 3 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 32.6 ± 1.4 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 54.7 ± 2.6 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 17.7 ± 0.6 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 11.7 ± 0.4 |
| 7 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 24.2 ± 1.3 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 89.9 ± 3.8 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 38.4 ± 1.5 |
| 10 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 23.8 ± 1.1 |
| 11 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 19.5 ± 0.8 |
| 12 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 56.2 ± 3.3 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45.4 ± 1.7 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41.8 ± 1.9 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.9 ± 1.6 |
| 16 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 41.5 ± 2.3 |
| 17 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.1 ± 0.7 |
| 18 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 56.4 ± 3.0 |
| 19 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 21.8 ± 1.1 |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 58.4 ± 2.9 |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 71.4 ± 3.7 |
| 22 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 71.8 ± 4.3 |
| 23 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 8.8 ± 0.2 |
| 24 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 45.3 ± 1.9 |
| 25 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 42.0 ± 2.2 |
| 26 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 52.1 ± 3.5 |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 47.5 ± 2.4 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47.0 ± 3.2 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41.6 ± 1.8 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40.5 ± 1.5 |
Note: I, Sucrose; J, NaNO3; K, K2HPO4; L, KH2PO4; M, KCl; N, MgSO4.7H2O; O, CaCl2.2H2O; P, Na3C6H5O7.2H2O; Q, Biotin; R, Trace elements.
Statistical analysis of the Plackett-Burman design for the complex and defined media
| | | | |
| constant | | 65.04 | < 0.0001 |
| A, Sucrose | 22.1004 | 11.05 | 0.0201 |
| B, NaNO3 | 75.1828 | 37.59 | < 0.0001 |
| C, Yeast extract | 30.4603 | 15.23 | 0.0025 |
| D, KH2PO4 | −4.7852 | −2.39 | 0.5877 |
| E, K2HPO4 | 27.8186 | 13.91 | 0.0049 |
| F, KCl | 8.7311 | 4.37 | 0.3272 |
| G, MgSO4.7H2O | 1.7222 | 0.86 | 0.8448 |
| H, Trace elements | −15.9140 | −7.96 | 0.0830 |
| | | | |
| constant | | 42.14 | < 0.0001 |
| I, Sucrose | 1.0233 | 0.51 | 0.7089 |
| J, NaNO3 | 27.1197 | 13.56 | < 0.0001 |
| K, K2HPO4 | −8.5673 | −4.28 | 0.0052 |
| L, KH2PO4 | −10.8947 | −5.45 | 0.0008 |
| M, KCl | −2.3609 | −1.18 | 0.3930 |
| N, MgSO4.7H2O | 5.1297 | 2.56 | 0.0733 |
| O, CaCl2.2H2O | −5.7316 | −2.87 | 0.0542 |
| P, Na3C6H5O7.2H2O | 2.7889 | 1.39 | 0.3149 |
| Q, Biotin | 1.1972 | 0.6 | 0.6625 |
| R, Trace elements | −22.8260 | −11.41 | < 0.0001 |
Coded and uncoded values of independent variables used in the central composite design for the complex and defined media
| | | | | | |
| A, Sucrose (g/L) | 10 | 40 | 70 | 100 | 130 |
| B, NaNO3 (g/L) | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| C, Yeast extract (g/L) | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| D, K2HPO4 (g/L) | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| | | | | | |
| A, NaNO3 (g/L) | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 |
| B, K2HPO4 (g/L) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| C, KH2PO4 (g/L) | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 |
| D, Trace elements (mL/L) | 0 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 |
Central composite design for the complex medium
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 137.9 ± 5.3 | 129.1 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 134.5 ± 6.2 | 132.3 |
| 3 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 157.9 ± 7.1 | 152.1 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 183.0 ± 7.7 | 187.1 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 176.8 ± 8.4 | 175.9 |
| 6 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 184.9 ± 8.0 | 179.1 |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 154.0 ± 6.5 | 151.2 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 189.8 ± 8.3 | 186.3 |
| 9 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 195.0 ± 8.6 | 187.4 |
| 10 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 165.8 ± 7.5 | 167.5 |
| 11 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 211.6 ± 9.7 | 210.3 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 224.1 ± 9.3 | 222.3 |
| 13 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 214.6 ± 9.1 | 209.5 |
| 14 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 194.9 ± 6.8 | 189.6 |
| 15 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 185.4 ± 5.7 | 184.8 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 195.2 ± 7.9 | 196.8 |
| 17 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 161.0 ± 7.6 | 172.1 |
| 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 187.2 ± 6.4 | 187.3 |
| 19 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 137.2 ± 4.1 | 148.7 |
| 20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 179.2 ± 6.8 | 178.8 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 167.3 ± 6.7 | 172.6 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 188.1 ± 7.3 | 193.9 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 146.8 ± 5.2 | 154.2 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 219.2 ± 8.9 | 222.9 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 238.9 ± 9.5 | 242.2 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 248.8 ± 8.0 | 242.2 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 241.5 ± 8.2 | 242.2 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 243.3 ± 9.4 | 242.2 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 233.1 ± 6.7 | 242.2 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 247.5 ± 7.2 | 242.2 |
Note: A, Sucrose; B, NaNO3; C, Yeast extract; D, K2HPO4.
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model of the complex and defined media
| | | | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | |
| Model | 33907.83 | 14 | 2421.99 | 44.71 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| A-Sucrose | 345.73 | 1 | 345.73 | 6.38 | 0.0233 | |
| B-NaNO3 | 1359.75 | 1 | 1359.75 | 25.1 | 0.0002 | |
| C-Yeast extract | 675.49 | 1 | 675.49 | 12.47 | 0.003 | |
| D-K2HPO4 | 7094.29 | 1 | 7094.29 | 130.97 | < 0.0001 | |
| AB | 1015 | 1 | 1015 | 18.74 | 0.0006 | |
| AC | 52.56 | 1 | 52.56 | 0.97 | 0.3402 | |
| AD | 530.92 | 1 | 530.92 | 9.8 | 0.0069 | |
| BC | 2264.16 | 1 | 2264.16 | 41.8 | < 0.0001 | |
| BD | 1.27 | 1 | 1.27 | 0.023 | 0.8806 | |
| CD | 606.84 | 1 | 606.84 | 11.2 | 0.0044 | |
| A2 | 6695.69 | 1 | 6695.69 | 123.61 | < 0.0001 | |
| B2 | 10541.5 | 1 | 10541.5 | 194.61 | < 0.0001 | |
| C2 | 5955.23 | 1 | 5955.23 | 109.94 | < 0.0001 | |
| D2 | 4934.49 | 1 | 4934.49 | 91.1 | < 0.0001 | |
| Residual | 812.53 | 15 | 54.17 | | | |
| Lack of Fit | 645.21 | 10 | 64.52 | 1.93 | 0.2428 | Not significant |
| Pure Error | 167.32 | 5 | 33.46 | | | |
| Cor Total | 34720.36 | 29 | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Model | 61950.92 | 14 | 4425.07 | 23.27 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| A-NaNO3 | 1466.37 | 1 | 1466.37 | 7.71 | 0.0141 | |
| B-K2HPO4 | 7429.48 | 1 | 7429.48 | 39.07 | < 0.0001 | |
| C-KH2PO4 | 1619.47 | 1 | 1619.47 | 8.52 | 0.0106 | |
| D-Trace elements | 3979 | 1 | 3979 | 20.92 | 0.0004 | |
| AB | 240.85 | 1 | 240.85 | 1.27 | 0.2781 | |
| AC | 3034.41 | 1 | 3034.41 | 15.96 | 0.0012 | |
| AD | 12478.18 | 1 | 12478.18 | 65.61 | < 0.0001 | |
| BC | 1745.83 | 1 | 1745.83 | 9.18 | 0.0084 | |
| BD | 1394.94 | 1 | 1394.94 | 7.33 | 0.0162 | |
| CD | 1498.72 | 1 | 1498.72 | 7.88 | 0.0133 | |
| A2 | 4217.35 | 1 | 4217.35 | 22.18 | 0.0003 | |
| B2 | 11914.43 | 1 | 11914.43 | 62.65 | < 0.0001 | |
| C2 | 42.42 | 1 | 42.42 | 0.22 | 0.6435 | |
| D2 | 15571 | 1 | 15571 | 81.88 | < 0.0001 | |
| Residual | 2852.69 | 15 | 190.18 | | | |
| Lack of Fit | 2166.36 | 10 | 216.64 | 1.58 | 0.3207 | Not significant |
| Pure Error | 686.33 | 5 | 137.27 | | | |
| Cor Total | 64803.62 | 29 |
Note: For the complex medium: R2 = 0.9766, R2 (adj) = 0.9548, R2 (pred) = 0.8860, CV = 3.84%, Adeq Precision = 21.513.
For the defined medium: R2 = 0.956, R2 (adj) = 0.9149, R2 (pred) = 0.7922, CV = 12.93%, Adeq Precision = 17.282.
Figure 3Response surface plots of AMVL production in the complex medium as a function of sucrose (A), NaNO (B), yeast extract (C) and K HPO (D) based on the results of the central composite design.
Central composite design for the defined medium
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 157.6 ± 7.6 | 143.0 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 141.9 ± 6.3 | 130.3 |
| 3 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 71.0 ± 3.7 | 68.2 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 43.0 ± 2.4 | 55.6 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 117.3 ± 5.9 | 113.9 |
| 6 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 49.1 ± 2.2 | 46.1 |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 81.2 ± 3.5 | 80.9 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 21.8 ± 2.6 | 13.1 |
| 9 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 68.2 ± 3.2 | 74.9 |
| 10 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 177.4 ± 9.1 | 173.9 |
| 11 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 38.2 ± 3.3 | 37.5 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 135.1 ± 7.4 | 136.5 |
| 13 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 85.3 ± 4.0 | 84.4 |
| 14 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 143.3 ± 7.5 | 128.4 |
| 15 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 94.8 ± 4.3 | 88.8 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 106.4 ± 5.7 | 132.8 |
| 17 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80.5 ± 3.6 | 86.1 |
| 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 122.1 ± 5.2 | 117.4 |
| 19 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 86.0 ± 4.4 | 103.2 |
| 20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 49.1 ± 3.5 | 32.8 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 171.9 ± 8.6 | 167.8 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 139.9 ± 7.4 | 134.9 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 19.8 ± 2.6 | 30.3 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 91.4 ± 5.8 | 81.8 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 141.9 ± 7.4 | 151.3 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 135.8 ± 6.1 | 151.3 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 154.2 ± 7.3 | 151.3 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 168.5 ± 8.7 | 151.3 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 149.4 ± 7.0 | 151.3 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 158.3 ± 8.2 | 151.3 |
Note: A, NaNO3; B, K2HPO4; C, KH2PO4; D, Trace elements.
Figure 4Response surface plots of AMVL production in the defined medium as a function of NaNO (A), K HPO (B), KH PO (C) and trace elements (D) based on the results of the central composite design.
Figure 5AMVL production, changes in pH, sucrose concentration and growth curves of MTG4 in optimized media and MEB.
Maximum specific growth rate, AMVL production and yields during the cultivations of MTG4 using three different media
| μ max (h−1) | 0.080 ± 0.002 | 0.052 ± 0.003 | 0.039 ± 0.001 |
| Maximum titer of AMVL (mg/L) | 250.9 ± 7.1 | 201.3 ± 13.9 | 58.8 ± 5.4 |
| Yxp (mg AMVL/g dw) | 17.4 ± 0.5 | 20.8 ± 1.4 | 13.6 ± 1.3 |
| rp (mg AMVL/g dw/h) | 1.02 ± 0.03 | 1.22 ± 0.08 | 0.62 ± 0.06 |