Literature DB >> 2500638

Revising diagnosis-related groups for neonates.

L K Lichtig1, R A Knauf, A Bartoletti, L M Wozniak, R H Gregg, J Muldoon, W C Ellis.   

Abstract

Groups of neonates who are usually treated at hospitals that provide specialized pediatric care are not adequately classified by the use of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). Therefore, a set of revised DRGs, pediatric modified DRGs (PM-DRGs), have been developed. Use of PM-DRGs substantially improves the classification of neonates in the following ways: a single pediatric modified major diagnostic category has been defined to include only and all neonates (patients younger than 29 days of age when admitted to the hospital); deaths and transfers of newborns are no longer combined into a single group; birth weight (rather than diagnosis) is used as the primary variable to differentiate categories of neonates; and duration of mechanical ventilation, presence of major problems, and surgery are used to define specific PM-DRGs. A total of 46 PM-DRGs have been developed to replace the 7 DRGs for neonates. Based on a sample of discharged patients from 13 children's hospitals, the overall variance reduction in duration of stay for neonates using PM-DRGs was 38.7% compared with 20.4% for DRGs. Variance reduction for PM-DRGs was 45.9% compared with 16.3% for DRGs when operating cost per case was used instead of duration of stay. After removing outliers at 150 days, the duration of stay variance reduction was 53.3% vs 23.6%, respectively, and the operating cost variance reduction was 58.8% vs 17.8%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2500638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  6 in total

1.  Paediatric medical audit.

Authors:  R Primavesi; R MacFaul
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Physician variations and the ancillary costs of neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  P H Perlstein; H D Atherton; E F Donovan; D K Richardson; U R Kotagal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  ESTIMATING MARGINAL RETURNS TO MEDICAL CARE: EVIDENCE FROM AT-RISK NEWBORNS.

Authors:  Douglas Almond; Joseph J Doyle; Amanda E Kowalski; Heidi Williams
Journal:  Q J Econ       Date:  2010-05-01

4.  The dissemination of smoking cessation methods for pregnant women: achieving the year 2000 objectives.

Authors:  R A Windsor; C Q Li; J B Lowe; L L Perkins; D Ershoff; T Glynn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Explaining resource consumption among non-normal neonates.

Authors:  R M Schwartz; T Michelman; J Pezzullo; C S Phibbs
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1991

Review 6.  Capturing patients' needs in casemix: a systematic literature review on the value of adding functioning information in reimbursement systems.

Authors:  Maren Hopfe; Gerold Stucki; Ric Marshall; Conal D Twomey; T Bedirhan Üstün; Birgit Prodinger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.