Literature DB >> 25006184

Peer review: rigor? Or rigor mortis?

Vytas A Bankaitis1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25006184      PMCID： PMC4197035          DOI： 10.15252/embr.201439204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Measuring the quality of editorial peer review.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Elizabeth Wager; Frank Davidoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Painful publishing.

Authors:  Martin Raff; Alexander Johnson; Peter Walter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The ups and downs of peer review.

Authors:  Dale J Benos; Edlira Bashari; Jose M Chaves; Amit Gaggar; Niren Kapoor; Martin LaFrance; Robert Mans; David Mayhew; Sara McGowan; Abigail Polter; Yawar Qadri; Shanta Sarfare; Kevin Schultz; Ryan Splittgerber; Jason Stephenson; Cristy Tower; R Grace Walton; Alexander Zotov
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.

Authors:  Hidde Ploegh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

Authors:  Richard Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 18.000
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.