Literature DB >> 25006084

Human rights versus legal control over women's reproductive self-determination.

Diya Uberoi, Maria de Bruyn.   

Abstract

States have a duty under international human rights law to protect people's health. Nonetheless, while some health-related policies and laws protect basic human rights, others violate fundamental rights when they criminalize, prohibit, and restrict access to necessary health services. For example, laws and regulations related to protection of life from conception, contraception, actions of pregnant women, and abortion can harm women and place women and health care providers in jeopardy of legal penalization. Given the adverse consequences of punitive and restrictive laws related to pregnancy, advocates, civil society groups, human rights groups, and government institutions must work together to promote, protect, and fulfill women's fundamental reproductive rights.
Copyright © 2013 Uberoi and de Bruyn. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 25006084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Hum Rights        ISSN: 1079-0969


  2 in total

1.  Abortion as empowerment: reproductive rights activism in a legally restricted context.

Authors:  Julia McReynolds-Pérez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  What has reproductive health decision-making capacity got to do with unintended pregnancy? Evidence from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey.

Authors:  Bright Opoku Ahinkorah; Abdul-Aziz Seidu; Francis Appiah; Linus Baatiema; Francis Sambah; Eugene Budu; Edward Kwabena Ameyaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.