BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is closely related to increased cardiovascular risk in women of reproductive age. Atrial conduction abnormalities in these patients have not been investigated in terms of atrial electromechanical delay measured by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) as an early predictor of atrial fibrillation development. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether TDI-derived atrial conduction time is prolonged in PCOS. METHODS: The study included 51 patients with PCOS and 48 age-matched healthy controls. P-wave dispersion (PWD) was calculated on the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram. Systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) functions, atrial electromechanical coupling, intraatrial and interatrial electromechanical delays were measured with conventional echocardiography and TDI. RESULTS: PWD was higher in PCOS women (50.45 ± 3.7 vs 34.73 ± 6.7 ms, p = 0.008). Interatrial and intraatrial electromechanical delay were found longer in patients with PCOS compared to controls (41.9 ± 9.0 vs 22.2 ± 6.6 ms, p < 0.001; 22.6 ± 5.8 vs 5.9 ± 4.7 ms, p < 0.001, respectively). Left atrial (LA) volume index and LV diastolic parameters were significantly different between the groups. PWD was correlated with interatrial electromechanical delay (r = 0.54, p < 0.01). Interatrial electromechanical delay was strongly correlated with homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance index and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (r = 0.68, p < 0.001; r = 0.53, p < 0.001, respectively). Interatrial electromechanical delay was positively correlated with LA volume index and deceleration time (r = 0.31, p = 0.04; r = 0.37, p = 0.021, respectively) and negatively correlated with flow propagation velocity (r = -0.38, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: This study shows that atrial electromechanical delay is prolonged in PCOS patients. Atrial electromechanical delay prolongation is related to low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance, and LV diastolic dysfunction in PCOS.
BACKGROUND:Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is closely related to increased cardiovascular risk in women of reproductive age. Atrial conduction abnormalities in these patients have not been investigated in terms of atrial electromechanical delay measured by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) as an early predictor of atrial fibrillation development. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether TDI-derived atrial conduction time is prolonged in PCOS. METHODS: The study included 51 patients with PCOS and 48 age-matched healthy controls. P-wave dispersion (PWD) was calculated on the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram. Systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) functions, atrial electromechanical coupling, intraatrial and interatrial electromechanical delays were measured with conventional echocardiography and TDI. RESULTS: PWD was higher in PCOSwomen (50.45 ± 3.7 vs 34.73 ± 6.7 ms, p = 0.008). Interatrial and intraatrial electromechanical delay were found longer in patients with PCOS compared to controls (41.9 ± 9.0 vs 22.2 ± 6.6 ms, p < 0.001; 22.6 ± 5.8 vs 5.9 ± 4.7 ms, p < 0.001, respectively). Left atrial (LA) volume index and LV diastolic parameters were significantly different between the groups. PWD was correlated with interatrial electromechanical delay (r = 0.54, p < 0.01). Interatrial electromechanical delay was strongly correlated with homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance index and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (r = 0.68, p < 0.001; r = 0.53, p < 0.001, respectively). Interatrial electromechanical delay was positively correlated with LA volume index and deceleration time (r = 0.31, p = 0.04; r = 0.37, p = 0.021, respectively) and negatively correlated with flow propagation velocity (r = -0.38, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: This study shows that atrial electromechanical delay is prolonged in PCOSpatients. Atrial electromechanical delay prolongation is related to low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance, and LV diastolic dysfunction in PCOS.
Authors: V Di Bello; F Santini; A Di Cori; A Pucci; C Palagi; M G Delle Donne; M Giannetti; E Talini; C Nardi; G Pedrizzetti; P Fierabracci; P Vitti; A Pinchera; A Balbarini Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Maria Kravariti; Katerina K Naka; Sophia N Kalantaridou; Nikolaos Kazakos; Christos S Katsouras; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Evangelos A Paraskevaidis; George P Chrousos; Agathocles Tsatsoulis; Lampros K Michalis Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-06-28 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Raimundo Carmona Puerta; Elizabeth Lorenzo Martínez; Magda Alina Rabassa López-Calleja; Gustavo Padrón Peña; Yaniel Castro Torres; Juan Miguel Cruz Elizundia; Fernando Rodríguez González; Luis Ángel García Vázquez; Elibet Chávez González Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 1.927