Literature DB >> 25005010

Conversion in endometrial cancer patients scheduled for laparoscopic staging: a large multicenter analysis: conversions and endometrial cancer.

Stefano Palomba1, Fabio Ghezzi, Angela Falbo, Vincenzo Dario Mandato, Gianluca Annunziata, Emilio Lucia, Antonella Cromi, Letizia Zannoni, Renato Seracchioli, Giorgio Giorda, Giovanni Battista La Sala, Fulvio Zullo, Massimo Franchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on patients with endometrial cancer converted to laparotomy are totally lacking. The aim of the present study was to evaluate surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer scheduled for laparoscopic staging but converted to laparotomy.
METHODS: Data of consecutive patients who had undergone surgery for staging endometrial cancer in seven Italian centers were reviewed. Patients' characteristics and surgical and oncological data were noted and analyzed according to surgery, i.e. laparotomy, laparoscopy, and laparoscopy converted to laparotomy.
RESULTS: Seventy-one out of 512 (13.9 %) patients scheduled to laparoscopy were converted to laparotomy for reasons related to anesthesiology [38/71 (53.5 %)] or surgery [33/71 (46.5 %)]. The conversion rate varied among stages [41/460 (8.9 %), 13/27 (48.1 %), 17/25 (68.0 %) in patients with stage I, II, and endometrial cancers, respectively]. Significant (P < 0.05) differences among groups were detected in patients' age, body mass index and previous pelvic surgery, and in the distribution of stages and histotype of endometrial cancers. The Kaplan-Meier procedure showed that the cumulative probability of first recurrence (P = 0.089, 0.590 and 0.084 for stage I, II and III, respectively) and of death (P = 0.108, 0.567 and 0.372 for stage I, II and III, respectively) categorized by stages did not attain statistical significance by log-rank testing after correction for confounding factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgical and oncological outcomes of converted patients are no different from those of patients staged successfully with laparoscopy or with laparotomy. The conversion to laparotomy should be not considered per se a complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25005010     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3589-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Observations on the role of assisted laparoscopic surgery in patients with early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Samir A Farghaly
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer: a 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Fabio Ghezzi; Angela Falbo; Vincenzo Dario Mandato; Gianluca Annunziata; Emilio Lucia; Antonella Cromi; Martino Abrate; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Giorgio Giorda; Fulvio Zullo; Massimo Franchi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Khadra Galaal; Andrew Bryant; Ann D Fisher; Maha Al-Khaduri; Fiona Kew; Alberto D Lopes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

5.  Redefining conversion in laparoscopic colectomy and its influence on outcomes: analysis of 418 cases from a single institution.

Authors:  Min-Hoe Chew; Kheng-Hong Ng; M C Stephanie Fook-Chong; Kong-Weng Eu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy.

Authors:  Franck Leonard; Nicolas Chopin; Bruno Borghese; Adolphe Fotso; Hervé Foulot; Joël Coste; Alexandre Mignon; Charles Chapron
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 7.  Clinical relevance of conversion rate and its evaluation in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Andries R H Twijnstra; Mathijs D Blikkendaal; Erik W van Zwet; Frank W Jansen
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mario Malzoni; Raffaele Tinelli; Francesco Cosentino; Ciro Perone; Marianna Rasile; Domenico Iuzzolino; Carmine Malzoni; Harry Reich
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Presurgical assessment of intraabdominal visceral fat in obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer treated with laparoscopic approach: relationships with early laparotomic conversions.

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Errico Zupi; Tiziana Russo; Rosamaria Oppedisano; Francesco Manguso; Angela Falbo; Achille Tolino; Alberto Mattei; Pasquale Mastrantonio; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 10.  Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Angela Falbo; Rita Mocciaro; Tiziana Russo; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  3 in total

1.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Contemporary Incidence of Medical Inoperability in Clinical Stage I Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Michelle Ertel; S Allison Staley; Tam Nguyen; Austin Johnson; Austin Hopkins; Nerlyne Desravines; Johnathon Recknagel; Xinyi Zhang; Xianming Tan; Leslie H Clark
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Martin Hübner; Hugo Teixeira Farinha; Fabian Grass; Anita Wolfer; Patrice Mathevet; Dieter Hahnloser; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 2.260

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.