Literature DB >> 25004918

Feasibility and need for violence risk screening at triage: an exploration of clinical processes and public perceptions in one Australian emergency department.

Catherine Daniel1, Marie Gerdtz2, Stephen Elsom3, Jonathan Knott4, Roshani Prematunga3, Elizabeth Virtue4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on patient aggression in hospital emergency departments supports the development of a systematic process for identifying individuals at risk of becoming violent. The feasibility and community acceptance of this approach is unknown. In this study, we determine the feasibility and explore the need for a violence risk screening process in one Australian emergency department.
METHOD: We used a descriptive exploratory design that involved semistructured interviews and observations of practice. The setting was an adult tertiary referral hospital and major trauma centre located in Melbourne, Australia. A convenience sample of nine triage nurses were observed assessing patients to explore how risk screening was undertaken in practice. Semistructured interviews were conducted with emergency department (ED) service users (N=19) to explore community perspectives on the process of violence risk screening.
RESULTS: Observations of practice revealed that nurses used observed and reported information to screen for potential risk of violence rather than employing a direct questioning approach. Interviews with community members in the emergency department waiting room highlighted a public expectation that nurses screen and accurately identify patients at risk of violence on arrival to the ED.
CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with local prevalence data, public expectations of emergency care supported the need to adopt a uniform approach to identifying people at risk of becoming violent on arrival to hospital. Observations of triage nurses interactions with patients revealed that the existing violence risk screening approach was not being consistently used by triage nurses. An integrated approach to determining violence risk during triage assessment is recommended. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  risk management; triage; violence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25004918     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of a novel Color-Risk Psychiatric Triage in a psychiatric emergency department.

Authors:  Alejandro Molina-López; Jeremy Bernardo Cruz-Islas; Mauricio Palma-Cortés; Diana Patricia Guizar-Sánchez; César Yehú Garfias-Rau; Martha Patricia Ontiveros-Uribe; Ana Fresán-Orellana
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.630

2.  Validity and reliability of the novel three-item occupational violence patient risk assessment tool.

Authors:  C J Cabilan; Joshua McRae; Ben Learmont; Karen Taurima; Sue Galbraith; Dale Mason; Robert Eley; Centaine Snoswell; Amy N B Johnston
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.057

Review 3.  Preventing and managing workplace violence against healthcare workers in Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Gabriele D'Ettorre; Vincenza Pellicani; Mauro Mazzotta; Annamaria Vullo
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-02-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.