Literature DB >> 25004340

Predicting painful or difficult intrauterine device insertion in nulligravid women.

Janina Kaislasuo1, Oskari Heikinheimo, Pekka Lähteenmäki, Satu Suhonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of preinsertion vaginal ultrasound assessment and menstrual and gynecologic history as predictors of difficult or painful intrauterine device insertion in nulligravid women.
METHODS: Nulligravid women seeking contraception were invited to participate in this nonrandomized study and given the choice between the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or a copper-releasing intrauterine device. All 165 enrolled women were interviewed and a pelvic examination, including vaginal ultrasonography, was performed before insertion. Insertion difficulties and pain intensity were recorded and assessed against uterine measurements and background characteristics.
RESULTS: Most insertions were assessed as easy (n=144 [89.4%]) and only two (1.2%) failed. Most women had uterine measurements smaller than the studied devices. Odds for difficulties at insertion decreased with every increasing millimeter in total uterine length (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.96, P=.006) and cervical length (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.97, P=.02) and similarly with every decreasing degree of (straighter) flexion angle (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, P=.005). No absolute threshold measurements could be determined. Still, the majority of insertions in small and flexed uteri were uneventful. Severe insertion pain was common (n=94 [58.4%]). Severe dysmenorrhea was the only predictor of insertion pain (OR 8.16 95% CI 2.56-26.02, P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic evaluation does not give additional information compared with clinical pelvic examination and sound measure. Although smaller uterine length measurements and steeper flexion angle more often predicted difficulties, the majority of insertions were uneventful in women with small measures. Dysmenorrhea was the only predictor of pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01685164. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25004340     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device Use in Overweight and Obese Women.

Authors:  Lynne Y Saito-Tom; Reni A Soon; Sara C Harris; Jennifer Salcedo; Bliss E Kaneshiro
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2015-11

Review 2.  Practical Advice for Emergency IUD Contraception in Young Women.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Dirk Wildemeersch
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 3.  Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura A Payne; Andrea J Rapkin; Laura C Seidman; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Jennie Ci Tsao
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 4.  Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review.

Authors:  Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Jeffrey T Jensen; Ilza Monteiro; Tina Peers; Maria Rodriguez; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Yanwu Zeng; Rebecca H Allen; Deborah Bartz; Paul A O'Brien; David Hubacher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 6.  Femilis(®) 60 Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System-A Review of 10 Years of Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Dirk Wildemeersch; Amaury Andrade; Norman Goldstuck
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2016-08-09

7.  Expulsion and continuation rates after postabortion insertion of framed IUDs versus frameless IUDs - review of the literature.

Authors:  Dirk Wildemeersch; Norman D Goldstuck
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2015-07-09

8.  Intrauterine device quo vadis? Why intrauterine device use should be revisited particularly in nulliparous women?

Authors:  Dirk Wildemeersch; Norman Goldstuck; Thomas Hasskamp; Sohela Jandi; Ansgar Pett
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2015-01-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.