Literature DB >> 25003780

Influence of trunk posture on lower extremity energetics during running.

Hsiang-Ling Teng1, Christopher M Powers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the influence of sagittal plane trunk posture on lower extremity energetics during running.
METHODS: Forty asymptomatic recreational runners (20 males and 20 females) ran overground at a speed of 3.4 m·s(-1). Sagittal plane trunk kinematics and lower extremity kinematics and energetics during the stance phase of running were computed. Subjects were dichotomized into high flexion (HF) and low flexion (LF) groups on the basis of the mean trunk flexion angle.
RESULTS: The mean (±SD) trunk flexion angles of the HF and LF groups were 10.8° ± 2.2° and 3.6° ± 2.8°, respectively. When compared with the LF group, the HF group demonstrated significantly higher hip extensor energy generation (0.12 ± 0.06 vs 0.05 ± 0.04 J·kg(-1), P < 0.001) and lower knee extensor energy absorption (0.60 ± 0.14 vs 0.74 ± 0.09 J·kg(-1), P = 0.001) and generation (0.30 ± 0.05 vs 0.34 ± 0.06 J·kg(-1), P = 0.02). There was no significant group difference for the ankle plantarflexor energy absorption or generation (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal plane trunk flexion has a significant influence on hip and knee energetics during running. Increasing forward trunk lean during running may be used as a strategy to reduce knee loading without increasing the biomechanical demand at the ankle plantarflexors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25003780     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  13 in total

1.  Biomechanical Risk Factors Associated with Running-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Linde Ceyssens; Romy Vanelderen; Christian Barton; Peter Malliaras; Bart Dingenen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Changing relative crank angle increases the metabolic cost of leg cycling.

Authors:  Asher H Straw; Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Clinical Indoor Running Gait Analysis May Not Approximate Outdoor Running Gait Based on Novel Drone Technology.

Authors:  Lindsay Lafferty; John Wawrzyniak; Morgan Chambers; Todd Pagliarulo; Arthur Berg; Nour Hawila; Matthew Silvis
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 4.  An Evidence-Based Videotaped Running Biomechanics Analysis.

Authors:  Richard B Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 1.784

5.  Hip-Extensor Strength, Trunk Posture, and Use of the Knee-Extensor Muscles During Running.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ling Teng; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  ASSESSING AND TREATING GLUTEUS MAXIMUS WEAKNESS - A CLINICAL COMMENTARY.

Authors:  Matthew Buckthorpe; Matthew Stride; Francesco Della Villa
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07

7.  Do Novice Runners Show Greater Changes in Biomechanical Parameters?

Authors:  Wenjing Quan; Feng Ren; Dong Sun; Gusztáv Fekete; Yuhuan He
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.781

Review 8.  An evidence-based review of hip-focused neuromuscular exercise interventions to address dynamic lower extremity valgus.

Authors:  Kevin R Ford; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Steven L Dischiavi; Eric J Hegedus; Emma F Zuk; Jeffrey B Taylor
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08-25

9.  Standing Up from a Chair with an Asymmetrical Initial Foot Position Decreases Trunk and Masticatory Muscle Activities in Healthy Young Men.

Authors:  Youngsook Bae
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-12

10.  Kinematic Analysis of the Postural Demands in Professional Soccer Match Play Using Inertial Measurement Units.

Authors:  José M Oliva-Lozano; Elisa F Maraver; Víctor Fortes; José M Muyor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.