Literature DB >> 25003674

Peptic ulcer complications requiring surgery: what has changed in the last 50 years in Turkey.

Hakan Güzel1, Sahin Kahramanca, Duray Şeker, Gülay Özgehan, Gündüz Tunç, Tevfik Küçükpınar, Hülagü Kargıcı.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The incidence and prevalence of peptic ulcer disease has decreased in recent years, but it is not so easy to make the same conclusion when complications of peptic ulcer are taken into consideration. The aim of this study is to determine the time trends in complicated peptic ulcer disease and to state the effects of H2 receptor blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), and H. pylori eradication therapies on these complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated the patients who were operated on for complications (perforation, bleeding, and obstruction) of peptic ulcer for the last 50 years. Patients were grouped into four groups (G1-G4) according to the dates in which H2 receptor blockers, PPIs, and eradication regimens for H. pylori were introduced The time periods that were studied were: (G1) 1962-1980, (G2) 1981-1990, (G3) 1991-1997, and (G4) 1998-2012.
RESULTS: In total, 2953 patients were operated on for complications of peptic ulcer disease, of which 86% of the patients were male. In G1, perforation and obstruction were significantly the most frequent complications (p<0.001), followed by bleeding. In groups G2 and G3, obstruction was still the most frequent complication requiring surgery (p<0.001). In G2 and G3, obstruction was followed by perforation and bleeding, respectively. In G4, perforation was significantly the most frequent complication (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: From 1962 to 1990 obstruction was the most common complication requiring surgery. In the last decade, perforation became the most common complication. In contrast to reports in the literature, bleeding was the least common complication requiring surgery in Turkey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25003674     DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2014.5526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1300-4948            Impact factor:   1.852


  5 in total

Review 1.  Perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kenneth Thorsen; Ewen M Harrison; Juliane Bingener; Morten H Møller; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Seasonal Variations and Trends in Hospitalization for Peptic Ulcer Disease in the United States: A 12-Year Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Ritesh Kanotra; Moiz Ahmed; Nileshkumar Patel; Badal Thakkar; Shantanu Solanki; Sarah Tareen; Matthew J Fasullo; Mayurathan Kesavan; Nikhil Nalluri; Ahsan Khan; Dhaval Pau; Liliane Deeb; Jeffrey Abergel; Ananya Das
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-10-30

3.  A Five-Year Review of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease in Irrua, Nigeria.

Authors:  A E Dongo; O Uhunmwagho; E B Kesieme; S U Eluehike; E F Alufohai
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  Risk Factors that Affect Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer Diseases in a Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Nebyou Seyoum; Daba Ethicha; Zelalem Assefa; Berhanu Nega
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-07-01

5.  Prevalence of H. Pylori in Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease at Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mekdim Tadesse; Eyasu Musie; Berhanetsehay Teklewold; Endalkachew Hailu
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2021-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.