Literature DB >> 25003567

TNBC vs non-TNBC: A retrospective review of differences in mean age, family history, smoking history, and stage at diagnosis.

Khurram Tariq1, Arezo Farhangi1, Fauzia Rana1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare mean age, ethnicity, smoking history, family history of breast cancer, and stage at diagnosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) vs non-TNBC at an inner city university program.
METHODS: We reviewed data in our tumor registry on patients seen between January 2000 and December 2005, and identified a total of 445 patients with various subtypes of breast cancers. Of these, 342 patients met our study criteria. Thirty-nine patients had TNBC and 303 had non-TNBC.
RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 59.87 ± 15.67 years for TNBC and 60.09 ± 13.98 years for non-TNBC (P=.9272). TNBC was more common in black than in white patients (58.97% vs 35.90%; OR, 2.755; P=.004), and non-TNBC was more common in white than in black patients (57.76% vs 39.27%). There was not a statistically significant difference in past or present smoking between the TNBC and non-TNBC patients (20.51% vs 27.72%; P=.4385). Family history of breast cancer was not statistically related to TNBC status: a positive family history was reported in 30.77% of TNBC patients vs 33.33% of non-TNBC patients (P=.8384), no family history was reported in 51.28% of TNBC patients vs 51.82% of non-TNBC patients, and family history was unknown in 17.95% of TNBC patients vs 14.85% of non-TNBC patients. Pathologic stage at the time of diagnosis was as follows for TNBC vs non-TNBC patients: stage 0, 15.79% vs 11.37% (P=.4332); stage I, 34.21% vs 30.98% (P=.6890); stage II, 28.98% vs 37.25% (P=.3205); stage III, 18.42% vs 17.25% (P=.8591); and stage IV, 3.63% vs 3.14% (P=.8651).
CONCLUSION: We found that in our patient population, black women were significantly more likely to have TNBC than non-TNBC, and white women were more likely to have non-TNBC than TNBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25003567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1543-0790


  5 in total

Review 1.  Triple negative breast cancer: the kiss of death.

Authors:  Adriana-Andreea Jitariu; Anca Maria Cîmpean; Domenico Ribatti; Marius Raica
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

2.  Triple negative breast cancer development can be selectively suppressed by sustaining an elevated level of cellular cyclic AMP through simultaneously blocking its efflux and decomposition.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Yue Li; Jessica Y Zhu; Dongdong Fang; Han-Fei Ding; Zheng Dong; Qing Jing; Shi-Bing Su; Shuang Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-27

3.  A clinical study on the use of Huaier granules in post-surgical treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Minghao Wang; Ying Hu; Lingmi Hou; Qinwen Pan; Peng Tang; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12

4.  A panel of eight microRNAs is a good predictive parameter for triple-negative breast cancer relapse.

Authors:  Hsiao-Chin Hong; Cheng-Hsun Chuang; Wei-Chih Huang; Shun-Long Weng; Chia-Hung Chen; Kuang-Hsin Chang; Kuang-Wen Liao; Hsien-Da Huang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.556

5.  A population-based comparison of treatment patterns, resource utilization, and costs by cancer stage for Ontario patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine Brezden-Masley; Kelly E Fathers; Megan E Coombes; Behin Pourmirza; Cloris Xue; Katarzyna J Jerzak
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.