Literature DB >> 25003553

Atypical auditory refractory periods in children from lower socio-economic status backgrounds: ERP evidence for a role of selective attention.

Courtney Stevens1, David Paulsen2, Alia Yasen3, Helen Neville4.   

Abstract

Previous neuroimaging studies indicate that lower socio-economic status (SES) is associated with reduced effects of selective attention on auditory processing. Here, we investigated whether lower SES is also associated with differences in a stimulus-driven aspect of auditory processing: the neural refractory period, or reduced amplitude response at faster rates of stimulus presentation. Thirty-two children aged 3 to 8 years participated, and were divided into two SES groups based on maternal education. Event-related brain potentials were recorded to probe stimuli presented at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 200, 500, or 1000 ms. These probes were superimposed on story narratives when attended and ignored, permitting a simultaneous experimental manipulation of selective attention. Results indicated that group differences in refractory periods differed as a function of attention condition. Children from higher SES backgrounds showed full neural recovery by 500 ms for attended stimuli, but required at least 1000 ms for unattended stimuli. In contrast, children from lower SES backgrounds showed similar refractory effects to attended and unattended stimuli, with full neural recovery by 500 ms. Thus, in higher SES children only, one functional consequence of selective attention is attenuation of the response to unattended stimuli, particularly at rapid ISIs, altering basic properties of the auditory refractory period. Together, these data indicate that differences in selective attention impact basic aspects of auditory processing in children from lower SES backgrounds.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Auditory processing; ERP; Refractory periods; SES; Socioeconomic status

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25003553     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  5 in total

1.  Neuroplasticity of selective attention: Research foundations and preliminary evidence for a gene by intervention interaction.

Authors:  Elif Isbell; Courtney Stevens; Eric Pakulak; Amanda Hampton Wray; Theodore A Bell; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Perinatal and early childhood biomarkers of psychosocial stress and adverse experiences.

Authors:  Alejandra Barrero-Castillero; Lara J Pierce; Saul A Urbina-Johanson; Laura Pirazzoli; Heather H Burris; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.953

3.  Auditory attention in childhood and adolescence: An event-related potential study of spatial selective attention to one of two simultaneous stories.

Authors:  Christina M Karns; Elif Isbell; Ryan J Giuliano; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.464

4.  5-HTTLPR polymorphism is linked to neural mechanisms of selective attention in preschoolers from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds.

Authors:  Elif Isbell; Courtney Stevens; Amanda Hampton Wray; Theodore Bell; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  Subjective SES is Associated with Children's Neurophysiological Response to Auditory Oddballs.

Authors:  Alexander L Anwyl-Irvine; Edwin S Dalmaijer; Andrew J Quinn; Amy Johnson; Duncan E Astle
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-12-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.