Literature DB >> 25003437

Predictors of Mastectomy Flap Necrosis in Patients Undergoing Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Review of 718 Patients.

Nasim Abedi1, Adelyn L Ho, Aaron Knox, Yashar Tashakkor, Tyler Omeis, Nancy Van Laeken, Peter Lennox, Sheina A Macadam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy flap necrosis (MFN) after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction can compromise postsurgical recovery, lead to additional surgeries, and compromise aesthetic outcome. The objective of this study was to determine if there is a difference in the rate of MFN in patients undergoing immediate alloplastic versus immediate autologous breast reconstruction. The secondary objective was to identify additional patient and surgical factors that may influence the rate of MFN.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction between 2003 and 2011 in the University of British Columbia Breast Program was performed. Demographic, oncologic, reconstructive, and surgical data were compiled.
RESULTS: Approximately 404 alloplastic and 314 autologous patients were reviewed. The overall rate of MFN was 12.9%. There was a trend toward a higher MFN rate in the autologous patient group (15.2% vs 11.6%, P = 0.095). After controlling for age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, preoperative breast radiation, surgery duration, cancer side, mastectomy type, and postoperative chemotherapy, no association was found between reconstruction type and MFN. BMI greater than 30, smoking status, and preoperative radiation were independent predictors of MFN. Surgical factors including longer duration of surgery and Wise pattern mastectomy incision were also found to be associated with increased odds of MFN.
CONCLUSION: We found no difference in the rate of MFN when comparing immediate alloplastic and autologous reconstruction methods. A number of patient and surgical factors were found to be predictors of MFN. The results of this large, retrospective study will help surgeons to tailor their reconstruction based on a patient's risk factors to minimize the incidence of MFN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25003437     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  16 in total

1.  Surveillance and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Breast Oncologic Surgery with Immediate Reconstruction.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-11

2.  Does "Two is Better Than One" Apply to Surgeons? Comparing Single-Surgeon Versus Co-surgeon Bilateral Mastectomies.

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Katya Losk; Kristen Camuso; Stephanie Caterson; Suniti Nimbkar; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Reoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis.

Authors:  R E Pataky; C R Baliski
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Comparison of Immediate Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients With and Without Prior Cosmetic Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Caroline K Fiser; Joshua P Kronenfeld; Sophia N Liu; Neha Goel; Wrood Kassira; John C Oeltjen; Susan B Kesmodel
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Nipple-sparing mastectomies: Clinical outcomes from a single academic institution.

Authors:  Barbara Dull; Leah Conant; Terence Myckatyn; Marissa Tenenbaum; Amy Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04

6.  The Impact of the Cosurgeon Model on Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Shantanu N Razdan; Hina J Panchal; Geoffrey E Hespe; Joseph J Disa; Colleen M McCarthy; Robert J Allen; Joseph H Dayan; Andrea Pusic; Babak Mehrara; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.329

Review 7.  One-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Concise Review.

Authors:  Nicolò Bertozzi; Marianna Pesce; Pierluigi Santi; Edoardo Raposio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Mastectomy skin flap necrosis: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Stuart A Robertson; Johann A Jeevaratnam; Avi Agrawal; Ramsey I Cutress
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-03-13

9.  Improving Outcome in Immediate Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction, an Algorithm for Operative Decision Making.

Authors:  Tamir Shay; Avi A Cohen; Dean Ad-El
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-10-02

Review 10.  Systematic review of methodologies used to assess mastectomy flap viability.

Authors:  F H K Jeon; J Varghese; M Griffin; P E Butler; D Ghosh; A Mosahebi
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.