| Literature DB >> 25003174 |
Juan Qiu, Rendong Li, Xingjian Xu, Chuanhua Yu, Xin Xia, Xicheng Hong, Bianrong Chang, Fengjia Yi, Yuanyuan Shi.
Abstract
This study aims to identify the landscape ecological determinants related to Oncomelania hupensis distribution, map the potential high risk of O. hupensis habitats at the microscale, and assess the effects of two environmental control strategies. Sampling was performed on 242 snail sites and 726 non-snail sites throughout Qianjiang City, Hubei Province, China. An integrated approach of landscape pattern analysis coupled with multiple logistic regression modeling was applied to investigate the effects of environmental factors on snail habitats. The risk probability of snail habitats positively correlated with patch fractal dimension (FD), paddy farm land proportion, and wetness index but inversely correlated with categorized normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and elevation. These findings indicate that FD can identify irregular features (e.g., irrigation ditches) in plain regions and that a moderate NDVI increases the microscale risk probability. Basing on the observed determinants, we predicted a map showing high-risk areas of snail habitats and simulated the effects of conduit hardening and paddy farming land rotation to dry farming land. The two approaches were confirmed effective for snail control. These findings provide an empirical basis for health professionals in local schistosomiasis control stations to identify priority areas and promising environmental control strategies for snail control and prevention.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25003174 PMCID: PMC4078596 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110606571
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Qianjiang City location and sample distribution. Fusion and mosaic remote sensing images are overlapped.
Results of the logistic regression models applied to snail habitats.
| Factors | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| FD (×100) | 0.280 | 1.323 (1.272–1.377) | <0.001 | 0.307 | 1.359 (1.292–1.430) | <0.001 |
| MedPS | 0.974 | 2.648 (1.803–3.891) | <0.001 | |||
| PSCOV | −0.002 | 0.998 (0.996–1.000) | 0.040 | |||
| MPFD | −11.872 | 0.000 (0.000–0.008) | 0.001 | |||
| AWMSI | −0.450 | 0.637 (0.425–0.956) | 0.029 | |||
| Dry farm land proportion (%) | −0.010 | 0.990 (0.982–0.999) | 0.035 | |||
| Paddy farm landproportion (%) | 0.040 | 1.041 (1.031–1.051) | <0.001 | 0.054 | 1.055 (1.032–1.079) | <0.001 |
| Silt proportion (%) | 0.213 | 1.237 (1.170–1.309) | <0.001 | |||
| DEM (m) | −0.052 | 0.949 (0.928–0.971) | <0.001 | −0.121 | 0.886 (0.828–0.947) | <0.001 |
| Wetness | 0.017 | 1.017 (1.003–1.031) | 0.017 | 0.051 | 1.052 (1.017–1.089) | 0.003 |
| NDVI | −1.358 | 0.257 (0.182–0.364) | <0.001 | −1.047 | 0.351 (0.166–0.743) | 0.006 |
Figure 2Predictive risk map of snail habitats in Qianjiang City.
Figure 3Map-simulated effects of paddy farming land rotationto dry farming land (a) and conduit hardening (b) compared with the risk before the implementation of these two environmental control strategies (c) in Haokou, Qianjiang City.