| Literature DB >> 25003031 |
Kerstin Pannek1, Roslyn N Boyd2, Simona Fiori3, Andrea Guzzetta4, Stephen E Rose5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral palsy (CP) is a term to describe the spectrum of disorders of impaired motor and sensory function caused by a brain lesion occurring early during development. Diffusion MRI and tractography have been shown to be useful in the study of white matter (WM) microstructure in tracts likely to be impacted by the static brain lesion. AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify WM pathways with altered connectivity in children with unilateral CP caused by periventricular white matter lesions using a whole-brain connectivity approach.Entities:
Keywords: AHA, assisting hand assessment; CDGM, cortical and deep grey matter; CP, cerebral palsy; CTD, children with typical development; Congenital hemiplegia; Connectome; DROP-R, detection and replacement of outliers prior to resampling; Diffusion MRI; FA, fractional anisotropy; FMAM, fit model to all measurements; GMFCS, gross motor function classification system; HARDI, high angular resolution diffusion imaging; HOMOR, higher order model outlier rejection; MACS, manual ability classification system; NBS, network based statistic; PWM, periventricular white matter; Tractography; Unilateral cerebral palsy
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25003031 PMCID: PMC4081979 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.05.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Demographics.
| CTD | Left hemiplegia | Right hemiplegia | p-Value | Left hemiplegia | Right hemiplegia | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All lesions | All lesions | Unilateral lesion | Bilateral lesion | Unilateral lesion | Bilateral lesion | ||||
| n = 17 | n = 23 | n = 27 | 0.530 | n = 12 | n = 11 | n = 19 | n = 8 | 0.292 | |
| Mean (SD) | 11.3 (2.7) | 10.5 (3) | 11.4 (3.3) | 9.4 (2.7) | 11.7 (2.9) | 11.6 (3.4) | 10.9 (3) | ||
| Range | 7.7–16.3 | 5.1–17 | 6–17.1 | 5.5–14.2 | 5.1–17 | 6–17.1 | 6.3–14.9 | ||
| 6/11 | 11/12 | 15/12 | 5/7 | 6/5 | 11/8 | 4/4 | |||
| N/A | I = 14 | I = 11 | 0.162 | I = 7 | I = 7 | I = 8 | I = 3 | 0.568 | |
| II = 9 | II = 16 | II = 5 | II = 4 | II = 11 | II = 5 | ||||
| N/A | I = 17 | I = 13 | 0.063 | I = 7 | I = 10 | I = 9 | I = 4 | 0.115 | |
| II = 6 | II = 14 | II = 5 | II = 1 | II = 10 | II = 4 | ||||
| N/A | n = 21 | n = 27 | n = 12 | n = 9 | n = 19 | n = 8 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 74 (13) | 65 (13) | 72 (13) | 78 (12) | 62 (10) | 74 (15) | |||
| Range | 55–93 | 46–90 | 55–93 | 58–93 | 46–84 | 48–90 | |||
CTD: children with typical development; MACS: Manual Ability Classification System; GMFCS: Gross Motor Function Classification System; AHA: Assisting Hand Assessment; logit: log-odds probability units; SD: standard deviation.
p-values smaller than 0.05 are highlighted in bold font.
Fig. 1Target regions used in the network analysis. Thirty-four cortical regions per hemisphere, the bilateral thalami, bilateral cerebella and brain stem were automatically delineated from high-resolution structural images using Freesurfer.
Fig. 2Results of the network-based statistic analysis (NBS). Alterations in fractional anisotropy (FA) compared to children with typical development were detected in children with left unilateral CP (top) and children with right unilateral CP (bottom). Results are shown for the comparison between children with typical development (CTD) and children with unilateral PWM lesions (left); between CTD and children with bilateral PWM lesions (right); and between CTD and the combined cohort of children with PWM lesions (i.e. the combined unilateral and bilateral cohorts; middle). Node colour indicates network membership. The size of the nodes indicates the number of connections of this node exhibiting reduced FA.
Results of FA comparison for right hemiplegia group.
| Connection | CTD | Right hemiplegia | t-Stat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brain stem–left superior frontal | 0.41 (0.03) | 0.39 (0.03) | 3.67 |
| Brain stem–left precentral | 0.45 (0.03) | 0.39 (0.04) | 7.01 |
| Brain stem–left postcentral | 0.44 (0.04) | 0.40 (0.04) | 4.10 |
| Brain stem–left paracentral | 0.46 (0.04) | 0.40 (0.04) | 5.29 |
| Left thalamus–left paracentral | 0.44 (0.05) | 0.36 (0.05) | 6.09 |
| Left thalamus–left precentral | 0.45 (0.05) | 0.36 (0.05) | 6.87 |
| Right thalamus–left superior frontal | 0.44 (0.04) | 0.41 (0.04) | 3.39 |
| Left superior frontal–left paracentral | 0.30 (0.04) | 0.26 (0.04) | 4.49 |
| Left superior frontal–left postcentral | 0.37 (0.04) | 0.34 (0.04) | 3.56 |
| Left superior frontal–left precentral | 0.38 (0.05) | 0.33 (0.05) | 3.43 |
| Left superior frontal–left superior parietal | 0.41 (0.03) | 0.38 (0.03) | 3.88 |
| Left precentral–left insula | 0.36 (0.04) | 0.32 (0.03) | 5.58 |
| Left precentral–left posterior cingulate | 0.43 (0.05) | 0.35 (0.05) | 4.39 |
| Left caudal middle frontal–left precentral | 0.33 (0.04) | 0.30 (0.04) | 3.30 |
| Left paracentral–left posterior cingulate | 0.37 (0.06) | 0.31 (0.06) | 3.83 |
| Left paracentral–right paracentral | 0.48 (0.07) | 0.40 (0.07) | 4.18 |
| Right precuneus–right superior parietal | 0.24 (0.03) | 0.26 (0.03) | − 3.21 |
Reported values are mean (standard deviation) of fractional anisotropy; CTD: children with typical development.
Supplementary Fig. 2Associations between microstructure (FA) and performance of the impaired hand in bimanual activities (measure using the Assisting Hand Assessment, AHA). Connections showing a significant relationship between FA and AHA are highlighted with grey background.
Association between AHA and FA.
| Connection | Left hemiplegia | Right hemiplegia |
|---|---|---|
| Brain stem–precentral | r2 = 0.44 (p = 0.001) | r2 = 0.33 (p = 0.002) |
| Brain stem–paracentral | r2 = 0.29 (p = 0.011) | r2 = 0.16 (p = 0.036) |
| Thalamus–precentral | r2 = 0.24 (p = 0.025) | r2 = 0.36 (p = 0.001) |
| Thalamus–paracentral | r2 = 0.37 (p = 0.003) | r2 = 0.19 (p = 0.021) |
| Postcentral–superior frontal | r2 = 0.35 (p = 0.005) | r2 = 0.22 (p = 0.013) |
| Precentral–insula | r2 = 0.22 (p = 0.032) | r2 = 0.14 (p = 0.052) |
| Superior frontal–superior parietal | r2 = 0.002 (p = 0.57) | r2 = 0.03 (p = 0.39) |
AHA: Assisting Hand Assessment; FA: fractional anisotropy.
Lesion scores.
| Left hemiplegia | Right hemiplegia | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All lesions | Unilateral lesions | Bilateral lesions | All lesions | Unilateral lesions | Bilateral lesions | |
| Global | 7.22 (4.88) | 4.71 (1.56) | 9.95 (5.83) | 8.81 (2.82) | 6.26 (2.32) | 8.12 (3.58) |
| Hemispheric R | 3.61 (1.74) | 2.96 (0.84) | 4.32 (2.21) | 1.02 (1.79) | 0.16 (0.69) | 3.06 (1.97) |
| Hemispheric L | 1.52 (2.05) | 0.00 (0.00) | 3.18 (1.86) | 3.06 (1.33) | 2.79 (1.03) | 3.69 (1.79) |
| Summary R | 5.09 (2.72) | 4.54 (1.68) | 5.68 (3.52) | 1.02 (1.79) | 0.16 (0.69) | 3.06 (1.97) |
| Summary L | 1.52 (2.05) | 0.00 (0.00) | 3.18 (1.86) | 5.31 (1.87) | 5.58 (1.95) | 4.69 (1.58) |
| BG & BS | 1.48 (1.62) | 1.58 (1.62) | 1.36 (1.69) | 2.26 (1.51) | 2.79 (1.32) | 1.00 (1.20) |
R—right; L—left; BG—basal ganglia; BS—brain stem.
Results of FA comparison for left hemiplegia group.
| Connection | CTD | Left hemiplegia | t-Stat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brain stem–right paracentral | 0.46 (0.02) | 0.42 (0.02) | 5.80 |
| Brain stem–right precentral | 0.45 (0.03) | 0.41 (0.03) | 4.80 |
| Right thalamus–right paracentral | 0.44 (0.03) | 0.38 (0.03) | 6.49 |
| Right thalamus–right precentral | 0.44 (0.03) | 0.40 (0.03) | 4.98 |
| Right precentral–right insula | 0.36 (0.02) | 0.33 (0.02) | 3.99 |
| Right precuneus–right medial orbito-frontal | 0.35 (0.03) | 0.32 (0.03) | 3.64 |
| Right precuneus–right caudal anterior cingulate | 0.32 (0.03) | 0.29 (0.03) | 3.92 |
| Right precuneus–right superior frontal | 0.37 (0.03) | 0.34 (0.03) | 3.50 |
| Right superior frontal–right postcentral | 0.37 (0.02) | 0.35 (0.02) | 4.94 |
| Right superior frontal–right superior parietal | 0.41 (0.03) | 0.37 (0.03) | 4.29 |
| Left middle temporal–left superior temporal | 0.28 (0.02) | 0.30 (0.02) | − 3.21 |
Reported values are mean (standard deviation) of fractional anisotropy; CTD: children with typical development.