Literature DB >> 25002958

Early diagnosis of leptospirosis.

Andrea Babic-Erceg1, Diana Karlovic-Martinkovic1, Marija Santini2, Zdenka Persic1, Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek1.   

Abstract

A 25-years old man from Zagreb, Croatia, was admitted to the University Hospital for Infectious Diseases four days after the onset of symptoms such as fever, intense pain in the calves and anuria. The patient owned a rabbit and, before the onset of the disease, repaired some rubber pipes damaged by rodents. At admission, he had a severe clinical picture with fever, hypotension, jaundice, immobility, and pain in leg muscles. Treatment with ceftriaxone was initiated in combination with volume restitution. Renal failure soon ensued. Consequently continuous venovenous hemodiaphiltration therapy was performed. Due to acute respiratory distress syndrome, the patient was mechanically ventilated. The patient's condition gradually improved and he recovered fully from multi-organ failure. Diagnosis was confirmed by a microscopic agglutination test (MAT) covering 15 leptospira serovars and real-time polymerase-chain reaction (PCR). The first serum sample taken on day 6 tested negative for leptospira, while PCR showed positive results for leptospiral DNA. The second serum sample taken on day 13 tested positive for serovar Canicola serogroup Canicola, serovar Patoc, serovar Grippotyphosa serogroup Grippotyphosa and serovar Tarassovi serogroup Tarassovi (titre 4000, 4000, 1000 and 2000, respectively), while PCR was negative. This report highlights the benefits of combining MAT and PCR methods in early diagnosis of leptospirosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  leptospirosis; microscopic agglutination test; polymerase chain reaction

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002958      PMCID: PMC4083297          DOI: 10.4081/idr.2014.5156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis Rep        ISSN: 2036-7430


Introduction

Leptospirosis represents an emerging public health problem worldwide. It is a zoonosis caused by bacteria that belongs to the Leptospira genus, Leptospiraceae family, Spirochetales order. The Leptospira genus consists of the pathogenic – Leptospira interrogans sensu lato and non-pathogenic – Leptospira biflexa sensu lato group. There are more than 200 pathogenic serovars. Classification into species, serogroups, serovars and strains is complicated and genotypic classification differs from serological classification. Bacteria live in renal tubules of carrier animals and are excreted by the urine. Leptospira are present in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the first seven to ten days from disease onset, when direct diagnosis is possible. They appear in the urine at the beginning of the second week and are excreted for up to 30 days. Polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) testing on blood, serum, urine, CSF and tissue samples can be performed in these cases. Antibodies appear five to ten days from the onset of disease or later, when their presence can be proven by microscopic agglutination (MAT). The span of tested serovars depends on strains circulating in a particular area.[8,9] Over the last decade, between 22 and 137 cases of human leptospirosis were reported annually in Croatia. We report a case of leptospirosis occurred in Croatia in order to demonstrate the need for combined MAT and PCR for an early diagnosis of this disease.

Case Report

A twenty-five years old patient from Zagreb, Croatia, was admitted to the University Hospital for Infectious Diseases Dr Fran Mihaljevic, four days after the onset of symptoms such as fever, intense pain in the calves and anuria. Epidemiological history revealed that the patient recently visited a village near Zagreb, where he repaired rubber pipes damaged by rodents around a house and cleaned the porch. The patient reported the presence of skin abrasions on his hands. It is to be noted that the patient also owned a rabbit. At admission, he had a severe clinical picture with fever, hypotension, tachycardia, jaundice, immobility, moderate conjunctival injection and pain in his leg muscles. Laboratory tests showed leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein, liver enzymes, urea and creatinine (Table 1). The electrocardiogram detected sinus tachycardia and incomplete right bundle branch block. Chest radiograph performed on day 2 revealed an extensive infiltrate in the left lung and non-cardiac pulmonary edema. Ultrasound of the abdomen showed moderate hepatomegaly with a diffuse lesion, a layer of free liquid surrounding the gall-bladder and enlarged kidneys. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to worsening his health conditions and circulatory collapse.
Table 1.

Laboratory results demonstrating disease progression and regression.

TestDay 5Day 6Day 8Day 12Day 20Range
CRP (mg/L)206.7NT68.336.84.8<5.0
WBC (×109/L)13.820.812.920.89.84.0-10.0
Platelets (×109L)423481220328100-400
RBC (×1012/L)3.832.862.442.533.704.4-5.8
Hemoglobin (g/L)11888767891140-180
Bilirubin (μmol/L)96.8194.6241.6145.991.03.0-20.0
Urea (mmol/L)7.412.111.9*18.97.42.8-8.3
Creatinine (μmol/L)129288195*17713879-125
AST (U/L)136170128719611-38
ALT (U/L)73647010527912-48
GGT (U/L)14510068758711-55
LDH (U/L)243215250679452<241
CK (U/L)NT391165423744<177

N T, not tested; CRP, C-reactive protein; WBC, white blood cells; RBC, red blood cells; AST, aspartate-aminotransferase; ALT, alanine-aminotransferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CK, creatinine kinase.

*Value on continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration.

Treatment with ceftriaxone was initiated due to the suspicion of leptospirosis, with volume restitution and vasopressor therapy. The disease rapidly progressed and renal failure ensued. Short-term continuous venovenous hemodiaphiltration therapy was performed. Due to a severe pneumonitis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (diagnosed by chest X-ray), the patient was mechanically ventilated and intubated over five days. The patient received 14 days of antimicrobial therapy. His condition gradually improved and full recovery from multiorgan failure has been achieved. The patient was discharged home after 21 days of hospital treatment.

Methods

Paired serum samples (on day 6 and 13) were tested for leptospira antibodies. MAT was used to test antibodies for 15 locally-occurring serovars of live strains: Grippotyphosa, Sejrö, Australis, Pomona, Canicola, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Tarassovi, Saxköbing, Ballum, Bataviae, Poi, Hardjo, Autumnalis, Mitis and Patoc. The endpoint was the highest dilution of serum in which 50% agglutination occured.[7,9] Although in areas where leptospirosis is endemic, a single titer of >800 in symptomatic patients is generally indicative of leptospirosis, titers as high as >1600 have been recommended. The serum was analyzed with real-time PCR (TaqMan kit). The first step was DNA extraction from the patient serum using commercial QIAamp DNA Mini kit (QIAGEN, Venio, the Netherlands), according to manufacturer’s instructions. The primers and the probe for the detection of the rrs (16S) gene were taken from the GenBank nucleotide sequence database [LeptoF(5’171CCCGCGTCCGATTAG3’), LeptoR(5’258TCCATTGTGGCCGRA/GACAC3’), pro be [5’205(FAM) CTCACCAAGGCGACGATCGGTAGC228 GTAGC228 3’ (TAMRA)]. Amplification and detection were carried out on the ABI Prism 7500 detector (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, USA), on a 40 cycle program (each cycle at 95°C/15” and 60°C/1’). A negative result was assigned where no amplification occurred, i.e. when the threshold cycle (Ct) value was greater than 40 cycles.

Results

The first serum sample collected on day 6 tested negative for leptospira in MAT, while PCR showed a positive result for leptospiral DNA. The second serum sample taken on day 13 was positive in MAT for serovar Canicola serogroup Canicola, serovar Patoc, serovar Grippotyphosa serogroup Grippotyphosa and serovar Tarassovi serogroup Tarassovi (titre 4000, 4000, 1000 and 2000, respectively) (Table 2), whereas it tested PCR negative. The CT (crossing threshold) value of the initial serum was 38, the second was >40 and was considered negative. There was no inhibition.
Table 2.

Results of the microscopic agglutination test for leptospira.

SerovarAntibody titre*
Grippotyphosa1000
SejröNegative
AustralisNegative
PomonaNegative
Canicola4000
IcterohaemorrhagiaeNegative
Tarassovi2000
SaxköbingNegative
BallumNegative
BataviaeNegative
PoiNegative
HardjoNegative
AutumnalisNegative
MitisNegative
Patoc4000

*Reciprocal value of the highest serum dilution which shows positive result.

Discussion and Conclusions

Rapid and early diagnosis of leptospirosis plays a significant role in the treatment of patients, since the antibiotic therapy is more effective, when initiated early in the course of the disease. Most cases of leptospirosis are diagnosed through serology with MAT as the reference serological method. Seroconversion may occur as early as 5 to 7 days after the onset of the disease, but sometimes it takes 10 days or longer. In addition, patients with fulminant leptospirosis may die before seroconversion occurs. Cross-reaction with several serovars is often observed in the initial phase of infection. The diagnostic advantage of PCR over serology is particularly relevant during the very early stages of the infection. However, the limitation of this method is its inability to identify the serovar. Furthermore the sensitivity of PCR in the early acute phase ranges from 60-100%. In this patient the first serology was negative for leptospira, while PCR was positive, whereas the second serology showed positive leptospira antibodies. This case highlights the importance of combining serology (confirmed acute infection by seroconversion in paired serum samples) and molecular techniques in the early diagnosis of leptospirosis.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Leptospirosis.

Authors:  P N Levett
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance.

Authors:  Ajay R Bharti; Jarlath E Nally; Jessica N Ricaldi; Michael A Matthias; Monica M Diaz; Michael A Lovett; Paul N Levett; Robert H Gilman; Michael R Willig; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Joseph M Vinetz
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 3.  Diagnosis of acute leptospirosis.

Authors:  Takao Toyokawa; Makoto Ohnishi; Nobuo Koizumi
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 4.  Laboratory diagnosis of leptospirosis: a challenge.

Authors:  Didier Musso; Bernard La Scola
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 4.399

Review 5.  Pathogenesis of leptospirosis: the influence of genomics.

Authors:  Ben Adler; Miranda Lo; Torsten Seemann; Gerald L Murray
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 6.  [Leptospirosis--current problems].

Authors:  Bernard Wasiński
Journal:  Przegl Epidemiol       Date:  2011

Review 7.  Diagnosis and epidemiology of leptospirosis.

Authors:  M Picardeau
Journal:  Med Mal Infect       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.152

8.  Further determination of DNA relatedness between serogroups and serovars in the family Leptospiraceae with a proposal for Leptospira alexanderi sp. nov. and four new Leptospira genomospecies.

Authors:  D J Brenner; A F Kaufmann; K R Sulzer; A G Steigerwalt; F C Rogers; R S Weyant
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-04

Review 9.  Leptospira and leptospirosis.

Authors:  Ben Adler; Alejandro de la Peña Moctezuma
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  A quantitative PCR (TaqMan) assay for pathogenic Leptospira spp.

Authors:  Lee D Smythe; Ina L Smith; Greg A Smith; Michael F Dohnt; Meegan L Symonds; Leonie J Barnett; David B McKay
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.