Literature DB >> 25002496

Improving management of small natural features on private lands by negotiating the science-policy boundary for Maine vernal pools.

Aram J K Calhoun1, Jessica S Jansujwicz2, Kathleen P Bell3, Malcolm L Hunter4.   

Abstract

Vernal pools are far more important for providing ecosystem services than one would predict based on their small size. However, prevailing resource-management strategies are not effectively conserving pools and other small natural features on private lands. Solutions are complicated by tensions between private property and societal rights, uncertainties over resource location and function, diverse stakeholders, and fragmented regulatory authority. The development and testing of new conservation approaches that link scientific knowledge, stakeholder decision-making, and conservation outcomes are important responses to this conservation dilemma. Drawing from a 15-y history of vernal pool conservation efforts in Maine, we describe the coevolution of pool conservation and research approaches, focusing on how research-based knowledge was produced and used in support of management decisions. As management shifted from reactive, top-down approaches to proactive and flexible approaches, research shifted from an ecology-focused program to an interdisciplinary program based on social-ecological systems. The most effective strategies for linking scientific knowledge with action changed as the decision-makers, knowledge needs, and context for vernal pool management advanced. Interactions among stakeholders increased the extent to which knowledge was coproduced and shifted the objective of stakeholder engagement from outreach to research collaboration and development of innovative conservation approaches. New conservation strategies were possible because of the flexible, solutions-oriented collaborations and trust between scientists and decision-makers (fostered over 15 y) and interdisciplinary, engaged research. Solutions to the dilemma of conserving small natural features on private lands, and analogous sustainability science challenges, will benefit from repeated negotiations of the science-policy boundary.

Keywords:  community-based conservation; mesofilter; natural resource management; temporary pools; wood frog

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002496      PMCID: PMC4121835          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323606111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  What kind of a science is sustainability science?

Authors:  Robert W Kates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process.

Authors:  Belinda Reyers; Dirk J Roux; Richard M Cowling; Aimee E Ginsburg; Jeanne L Nel; Patrick O' Farrell
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  The Maine Vernal Pool Mapping and Assessment Program: engaging municipal officials and private landowners in community-based citizen science.

Authors:  Jessica S Jansujwicz; Aram J K Calhoun; Robert J Lilieholm
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Elinor Ostrom
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Demonstration as a means to translate conservation science into practice.

Authors:  John A Hall; Erica Fleishman
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 6.  A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation.

Authors:  David Lindenmayer; Richard J Hobbs; Rebecca Montague-Drake; Jason Alexandra; Andrew Bennett; Mark Burgman; Peter Cale; Aram Calhoun; Viki Cramer; Peter Cullen; Don Driscoll; Lenore Fahrig; Joern Fischer; Jerry Franklin; Yrjo Haila; Malcolm Hunter; Philip Gibbons; Sam Lake; Gary Luck; Chris MacGregor; Sue McIntyre; Ralph Mac Nally; Adrian Manning; James Miller; Hal Mooney; Reed Noss; Hugh Possingham; Denis Saunders; Fiona Schmiegelow; Michael Scott; Dan Simberloff; Tom Sisk; Gary Tabor; Brian Walker; John Wiens; John Woinarski; Erika Zavaleta
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).

Authors:  William C Clark; Thomas P Tomich; Meine van Noordwijk; David Guston; Delia Catacutan; Nancy M Dickson; Elizabeth McNie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management.

Authors:  Katharine Jacobs; Louis Lebel; James Buizer; Lee Addams; Pamela Matson; Ellen McCullough; Po Garden; George Saliba; Timothy Finan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development.

Authors:  David W Cash; William C Clark; Frank Alcock; Nancy M Dickson; Noelle Eckley; David H Guston; Jill Jäger; Ronald B Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 12.779

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Seasonality of inundation in geographically isolated wetlands across the United States.

Authors:  Junehyeong Park; Mukesh Kumar; Charles R Lane; Nandita B Basu
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.947

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.