Literature DB >> 25002281

Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the consistency of intracranial meningiomas.

Rossana Romani1, Wei-Jun Tang, Ying Mao, Dai-Jun Wang, Hai-Liang Tang, Feng-Ping Zhu, Xiao-Ming Che, Ye Gong, Kang Zheng, Ping Zhong, Shi-Qi Li, Wei-Min Bao, Christian Benner, Jing-Song Wu, Liang-Fu Zhou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability of preoperative MRI-sequences to predict the consistency of intracranial meningiomas has not yet been clearly defined. We aim to demonstrate that diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) improves the prediction of intracranial meningiomas consistency.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 110 meningioma patients operated on in a single center from March 1st to the 25th of May 2012. Demographic data, location and size of the tumor, peritumoral edema, T1WI, T2WI, proton density weighted (PDWI), fluid-attenuated inversion recover (FLAIR) sequences, and arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion were studied and compared with the gray matter signal to predict meningioma consistency. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were included in the preoperative MRI. Meningioma consistency was evaluated by the operating surgeon who was unaware of the neuroradiological findings.
RESULTS: In univariate analysis, meningioma size (diameter > 2 cm) and supratentorial or sphenoidal wing location were more frequently associated with hard-consistency meningiomas (p < 0.05). In addition, isointense signal on MD maps (p = 0.009), hyperintense signal on FA maps, and FA value > 0.3 (p = 0.00001) were associated with hard-consistency tumors. Age and sex, T1WI, T2WI, PDWI, FLAIR, or ASL perfusion sequences and peritumoral edema were not significantly associated with meningioma consistency. In logistic regression analysis, the most accurate model (AUC: 0.9459) for predicting a hard-consistency meningioma shows that an isointense signal in MD-maps, a hyperintense signal in FA-maps, and an FA value of more than 0.3 have a significant predictive value.
CONCLUSIONS: FA value and MD and FA maps are useful for prediction of meningioma consistency and, therefore, may be considered in the preoperative routine MRI examination of all patients with intracranial meningiomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002281     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-014-2149-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of skull base pathologies: Role of advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques.

Authors:  Ankit Mathur; Narendra Jain; C Kesavadas; Bejoy Thomas; T R Kapilamoorthy
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 2.  Predicting Meningioma Consistency on Preoperative Neuroimaging Studies.

Authors:  Mark S Shiroishi; Steven Y Cen; Benita Tamrazi; Francesco D'Amore; Alexander Lerner; Kevin S King; Paul E Kim; Meng Law; Darryl H Hwang; Orest B Boyko; Chia-Shang J Liu
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 3.  Can MRI predict meningioma consistency?: a correlation with tumor pathology and systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Yao; Margaret Pain; Priti Balchandani; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Imaging and diagnostic advances for intracranial meningiomas.

Authors:  Raymond Y Huang; Wenya Linda Bi; Brent Griffith; Timothy J Kaufmann; Christian la Fougère; Nils Ole Schmidt; Jöerg C Tonn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth Aldape; Farshad Nassiri; Gelareh Zadeh; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Utility of preoperative meningioma consistency measurement with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE): a review.

Authors:  Alexander G Chartrain; Mehmet Kurt; Amy Yao; Rui Feng; Kambiz Nael; J Mocco; Joshua B Bederson; Priti Balchandani; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Meningioma Consistency: Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics, Operative Findings, and Histopathological Features.

Authors:  Mahmoud Alyamany; Mohammad M Alshardan; Abdullah Abu Jamea; Nahid ElBakry; Lahbib Soualmi; Yasser Orz
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  REVIEW: MR elastography of brain tumors.

Authors:  Adomas Bunevicius; Katharina Schregel; Ralph Sinkus; Alexandra Golby; Samuel Patz
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Comparison of Canine and Feline Meningiomas Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Fractional Anisotropy.

Authors:  Masae Wada; Daisuke Hasegawa; Yuji Hamamoto; Yoshihiko Yu; Rikako Asada; Aki Fujiwara-Igarashi; Michio Fujita
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-11

9.  Preoperative Prediction of Meningioma Consistency via Machine Learning-Based Radiomics.

Authors:  Yixuan Zhai; Dixiang Song; Fengdong Yang; Yiming Wang; Xin Jia; Shuxin Wei; Wenbin Mao; Yake Xue; Xinting Wei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Importance of Pre-treatment Fractional Anisotropy Value in Predicting Volumetric Response in Patients with Meningioma Treated with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.

Authors:  Dilek H Cesme; Alpay Alkan; Lutfullah Sari; Fatma Yabul; Hafize O Temur; Mahmut E Aykan; Mehmet H Seyithanoglu; Mustafa A Hatiboglu
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging       Date:  2021
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.