Literature DB >> 25002206

Distinctive pharmacological differences between liver cancer cell lines HepG2 and Hep3B.

Guo-Hua Qiu1, Xiaojin Xie, Fang Xu, Xiaohao Shi, Yue Wang, Linhong Deng.   

Abstract

As cellular models for in vitro liver cancer and toxicity studies, HepG2 and Hep3B are the two most frequently used liver cancer cell lines. Because of their similarities they are often treated as the same in experimental studies. However, there are many differences that have been largely over-sighted or ignored between them. In this review, we summarize the differences between HepG2 and Hep3B cell lines that can be found in the literature based on PubMed search. We particularly focus on the differential gene expression, differential drug responses (chemosensitivity, cell cycle and growth inhibition, and gene induction), signaling pathways associated with these differences, as well as the factors in governing these differences between HepG2 and Hep3B cell lines. Based on our analyses of the available data, we suggest that neither HBx nor p53 may be the crucial factor to determine the differences between HepG2 and Hep3B cell lines although HBx regulates the expression of the majority of genes that are differentially expressed between HepG2 and Hep3B. Instead, the different maturation stages in cancer development of the original specimen between HepG2 and Hep3B may be responsible for the differences between them. This review provides insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the differences between HepG2 and Hep3B and help investigators especially the beginners in the areas of liver cancer research and drug metabolism to fully understand, and thus better use and interpret the data from these two cell lines in their studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002206      PMCID: PMC4294832          DOI: 10.1007/s10616-014-9761-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotechnology        ISSN: 0920-9069            Impact factor:   2.058


  102 in total

Review 1.  Use of metabolically competent human hepatoma cells for the detection of mutagens and antimutagens.

Authors:  S Knasmüller; W Parzefall; R Sanyal; S Ecker; C Schwab; M Uhl; V Mersch-Sundermann; G Williamson; G Hietsch; T Langer; F Darroudi; A T Natarajan
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1998-06-18       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression.

Authors:  Bram De Craene; Geert Berx
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Inhibition of hepatoma cell growth in vitro by arylating and non-arylating K vitamin analogs. Significance of protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibition.

Authors:  Y Nishikawa; Z Wang; J Kerns; C S Wilcox; B I Carr
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-12-03       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Apoptotic events induced by naturally occurring retinoids ATRA and 13-cis retinoic acid on human hepatoma cell lines Hep3B and HepG2.

Authors:  Frederick Arce; Omar Gätjens-Boniche; Ernesto Vargas; Berta Valverde; Cecilia Díaz
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Evaluation of hepatitis B viral replication and proteomic analysis of HepG2.2.15 cell line after knockdown of HBx.

Authors:  Hai-Yang Xie; Jun Cheng; Chun-Yang Xing; Jin-Jin Wang; Rong Su; Xu-Yong Wei; Lin Zhou; Shu-Sen Zheng
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2011-06

Review 6.  Molecularly targeted therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hung Huynh
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 7.  Classic and novel roles of p53: prospects for anticancer therapy.

Authors:  José J Fuster; Silvia M Sanz-González; Ute M Moll; Vicente Andrés
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 11.951

8.  Expression of human aldehyde dehydrogenase-3 associated with hepatocellular carcinoma: promoter regions and nuclear protein factors related to the expression.

Authors:  C Chang; L C Hsu; V Davé; A Yoshida
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.101

9.  Abrogation of constitutive STAT3 activity sensitizes human hepatoma cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis.

Authors:  Mariko Kusaba; Kazuhiko Nakao; Takashi Goto; Daisuke Nishimura; Hiroshi Kawashimo; Hidetaka Shibata; Yasuhide Motoyoshi; Naota Taura; Tatsuki Ichikawa; Keisuke Hamasaki; Katsumi Eguchi
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  Notch1 is a p53 target gene involved in human keratinocyte tumor suppression through negative regulation of ROCK1/2 and MRCKalpha kinases.

Authors:  Karine Lefort; Anna Mandinova; Paola Ostano; Vihren Kolev; Valerie Calpini; Ingrid Kolfschoten; Vikram Devgan; Jocelyn Lieb; Wassim Raffoul; Daniel Hohl; Victor Neel; Jonathan Garlick; Giovanna Chiorino; G Paolo Dotto
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  32 in total

1.  MicroRNA-146a-5p enhances ginsenoside Rh2-induced anti-proliferation and the apoptosis of the human liver cancer cell line HepG2.

Authors:  Weiwen Chen; Shuai Chu; Haixia Li; Yurong Qiu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Synergistic antiproliferative effects of curcumin and celecoxib in hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Fatma M Abdallah; Maged W Helmy; Mohamed A Katary; Asser I Ghoneim
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Novel palladium (II) complexes with tetradentate thiosemicarbazones. Synthesis, characterization, in vitro cytotoxicity and xanthine oxidase inhibition.

Authors:  Dilşad Özerkan; Onur Ertik; Buşra Kaya; Serap Erdem Kuruca; Refiye Yanardag; Bahri Ülküseven
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Circular dorsal ruffles disturb the growth factor-induced PI3K-AKT pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma Hep3B cells.

Authors:  Xiaowei Sun; Yujie Liu; Shuheng Zhou; Li Wang; Jinzi Wei; Rui Hua; Zhongyang Shen; Sei Yoshida
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 7.525

5.  Comparison of proteolytic, cytotoxic and anticoagulant properties of chromatographically fractionated bromelain to un-fractionated bromelain.

Authors:  Samina Badar; Mohamed Azarkan; Ahmed H Mekkawy; Javed Akhter; Krishna Pillai; Rachida El Mahyaoui; Kevin Ke; Lauren Cavanaugh; David L Morris
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Selection of internal references for qRT-PCR assays of human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Zhaoyu Qin; Lili Cai; Lili Zou; Jing Zhao; Fan Zhong
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene Induces Apoptosis via ROS-Regulated Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in HepG2 and Hep3B Cells.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Liao; Chih-Ming Kao; Chao-Ling Yao; Po-Wei Chiu; Chun-Chen Yao; Ssu-Ching Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Perturbation of the Actin Cytoskeleton in Human Hepatoma Cells Influences Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Signaling, but Not Soluble IL-6 Receptor Generation or NF-κB Activation.

Authors:  Elizabeta Georgieva; Stefan L Leber; Cora Wex; Christoph Garbers
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  c-Src kinase impairs the expression of mitochondrial OXPHOS complexes in liver cancer.

Authors:  Caroline A Hunter; Hasan Koc; Emine C Koc
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.850

10.  Hypoxia induces the expression of TET enzymes in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Guofu Lin; Wenyu Sun; Zhi Yang; Jinshuai Guo; Haiyang Liu; Jian Liang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.