K Herholz1, R Evans, J Anton-Rodriguez, R Hinz, J C Matthews. 1. Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, 27 Palatine Road, Manchester, England, M20 3LJ, UK, karl.herholz@manchester.ac.uk.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: There are specific dose recommendations for diagnostic amyloid PET imaging with 18F-florbetapir, but they may not apply to research studies using regional quantitative analysis. We, therefore, studied the effect of tracer dose reduction on the discriminative power of regional analysis. METHODS: Using bootstrap resampling of list-mode data from 18F-florbetapir scans, a total of 800 images were reconstructed for four different dosage levels: 100, 50, 20, and 10%. The effect of the injected dose on the variation of measured radiotracer uptake was determined in large cortical regions defined on co-registered and segmented magnetic resonance images. The impact of the observed variation on the discrimination between normal controls and patients with AD was then assessed using data in a cohort study described by Fleisher et al. (Arch Neurol 68(11):1404-1411, 2011). RESULTS: The coefficient of variance for the cortex to cerebellum uptake ratio increased from 0.9% at full dose of 300 MBq to 2.5% at 10% of this dose, but was still small compared to biological variation. It, therefore, had very little impact on discrimination between AD and elderly controls. The original area under the ROC curve was 0.881, decreasing to 0.878 at 10% of full dose. Original sensitivity for discrimination between AD and controls was 82.0%, while specificity was 77.3%; these decreased to 81.8 and 77.1%, respectively, at the reduced dose. However, the number of subjects within the classification border zone between proven amyloid pathology and young healthy controls increased substantially by 7 to 14%. CONCLUSION: A substantial reduction of tracer dose increases uncertainty at the classification border zone while still providing good discrimination between AD patients and controls when using activity data from cortical regions defined on co-registered and segmented MR scans.
UNLABELLED: There are specific dose recommendations for diagnostic amyloid PET imaging with 18F-florbetapir, but they may not apply to research studies using regional quantitative analysis. We, therefore, studied the effect of tracer dose reduction on the discriminative power of regional analysis. METHODS: Using bootstrap resampling of list-mode data from 18F-florbetapir scans, a total of 800 images were reconstructed for four different dosage levels: 100, 50, 20, and 10%. The effect of the injected dose on the variation of measured radiotracer uptake was determined in large cortical regions defined on co-registered and segmented magnetic resonance images. The impact of the observed variation on the discrimination between normal controls and patients with AD was then assessed using data in a cohort study described by Fleisher et al. (Arch Neurol 68(11):1404-1411, 2011). RESULTS: The coefficient of variance for the cortex to cerebellum uptake ratio increased from 0.9% at full dose of 300 MBq to 2.5% at 10% of this dose, but was still small compared to biological variation. It, therefore, had very little impact on discrimination between AD and elderly controls. The original area under the ROC curve was 0.881, decreasing to 0.878 at 10% of full dose. Original sensitivity for discrimination between AD and controls was 82.0%, while specificity was 77.3%; these decreased to 81.8 and 77.1%, respectively, at the reduced dose. However, the number of subjects within the classification border zone between proven amyloid pathology and young healthy controls increased substantially by 7 to 14%. CONCLUSION: A substantial reduction of tracer dose increases uncertainty at the classification border zone while still providing good discrimination between ADpatients and controls when using activity data from cortical regions defined on co-registered and segmented MR scans.
Authors: Guy M McKhann; David S Knopman; Howard Chertkow; Bradley T Hyman; Clifford R Jack; Claudia H Kawas; William E Klunk; Walter J Koroshetz; Jennifer J Manly; Richard Mayeux; Richard C Mohs; John C Morris; Martin N Rossor; Philip Scheltens; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Sandra Weintraub; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Abhinay D Joshi; Michael J Pontecorvo; Chrisopher M Clark; Alan P Carpenter; Danna L Jennings; Carl H Sadowsky; Lee P Adler; Karel D Kovnat; John P Seibyl; Anupa Arora; Krishnendu Saha; Jason D Burns; Mark J Lowrey; Mark A Mintun; Daniel M Skovronsky Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Charles C Watson; Michael E Casey; Bernard Bendriem; Jonathan P Carney; David W Townsend; Stefan Eberl; Steve Meikle; Frank P Difilippo Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christopher M Clark; Michael J Pontecorvo; Thomas G Beach; Barry J Bedell; R Edward Coleman; P Murali Doraiswamy; Adam S Fleisher; Eric M Reiman; Marwan N Sabbagh; Carl H Sadowsky; Julie A Schneider; Anupa Arora; Alan P Carpenter; Matthew L Flitter; Abhinay D Joshi; Michael J Krautkramer; Ming Lu; Mark A Mintun; Daniel M Skovronsky Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Annapaola Prestia; Anna Caroli; Karl Herholz; Eric Reiman; Kewei Chen; William J Jagust; Giovanni B Frisoni Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Jurgen E M Mourik; Mark Lubberink; Floris H P van Velden; Reina W Kloet; Bart N M van Berckel; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: P Edison; S F Carter; J O Rinne; G Gelosa; K Herholz; A Nordberg; D J Brooks; R Hinz Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ranjan Duara; David A Loewenstein; Qian Shen; Warren Barker; Elizabeth Potter; Daniel Varon; Kristen Heurlin; Rik Vandenberghe; Christopher Buckley Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Jordi A Matías-Guiu; María Nieves Cabrera-Martín; Teresa Moreno-Ramos; María Valles-Salgado; Marta Fernandez-Matarrubia; José Luis Carreras; Jorge Matías-Guiu Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Kevin T Chen; Matti Schürer; Jiahong Ouyang; Mary Ellen I Koran; Guido Davidzon; Elizabeth Mormino; Solveig Tiepolt; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Osama Sabri; Greg Zaharchuk; Henryk Barthel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: James Bland; Abolfazl Mehranian; Martin A Belzunce; Sam Ellis; Colm J McGinnity; Alexander Hammers; Andrew J Reader Journal: IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci Date: 2017-11-09
Authors: Kevin T Chen; Tyler N Toueg; Mary Ellen Irene Koran; Guido Davidzon; Michael Zeineh; Dawn Holley; Harsh Gandhi; Kim Halbert; Athanasia Boumis; Gabriel Kennedy; Elizabeth Mormino; Mehdi Khalighi; Greg Zaharchuk Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Pawel J Markiewicz; Julian C Matthews; John Ashburner; David M Cash; David L Thomas; Enrico De Vita; Anna Barnes; M Jorge Cardoso; Marc Modat; Richard Brown; Kris Thielemans; Casper da Costa-Luis; Isadora Lopes Alves; Juan Domingo Gispert; Mark E Schmidt; Paul Marsden; Alexander Hammers; Sebastien Ourselin; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 6.556