BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be used to predict the spread of cancer to distant sites, to monitor the clinical response to therapy and to predict patient survival. The currently used EpCAM antibody-mediated identification of CTCs may lead to false negative results due to the low level or absence of EpCAM expression in several types of cancer, thus provoking a need to identify novel CTC markers. METHODS: The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) microarray dataset, storing 18,915 gene expression profiles across 967 cancer cell lines derived from 25 primary sites, was systematically analyzed. The results obtained were cross-validated using an independent microarray dataset generated from 1,911 clinical cancer specimens derived from 15 different cancers. RESULTS: Through bioinformatics analyses we identified, categorized and prioritized three classes of novel markers: pan-CTC markers (n = 45), EpCAM((-/low)) CTC markers (n = 16) and single cancer type-specific markers (n = 74). The pan-CTC markers were significantly, uniformly and constitutively over-expressed in most cancer types, except in cancers of hematopoietic and lymphoid origin. The EpCAM((-/low)) CTC markers were over-expressed in cancers with low or undetectable EpCAM expression levels. Among these, 22 markers were validated in an independent microarray dataset. In addition, 74 markers that were over-expressed in only single cancer types were categorized. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of these novel markers in conjunction with cancer type-specific markers should be able to quantify CTCs that are not captured by EpCAM antibodies, and to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of CTC detection among admixtures containing leucocytes or other types of contaminants.
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be used to predict the spread of cancer to distant sites, to monitor the clinical response to therapy and to predict patient survival. The currently used EpCAM antibody-mediated identification of CTCs may lead to false negative results due to the low level or absence of EpCAM expression in several types of cancer, thus provoking a need to identify novel CTC markers. METHODS: The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) microarray dataset, storing 18,915 gene expression profiles across 967 cancer cell lines derived from 25 primary sites, was systematically analyzed. The results obtained were cross-validated using an independent microarray dataset generated from 1,911 clinical cancer specimens derived from 15 different cancers. RESULTS: Through bioinformatics analyses we identified, categorized and prioritized three classes of novel markers: pan-CTC markers (n = 45), EpCAM((-/low)) CTC markers (n = 16) and single cancer type-specific markers (n = 74). The pan-CTC markers were significantly, uniformly and constitutively over-expressed in most cancer types, except in cancers of hematopoietic and lymphoid origin. The EpCAM((-/low)) CTC markers were over-expressed in cancers with low or undetectable EpCAM expression levels. Among these, 22 markers were validated in an independent microarray dataset. In addition, 74 markers that were over-expressed in only single cancer types were categorized. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of these novel markers in conjunction with cancer type-specific markers should be able to quantify CTCs that are not captured by EpCAM antibodies, and to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of CTC detection among admixtures containing leucocytes or other types of contaminants.
Authors: Tony Blick; Honor Hugo; Edwin Widodo; Mark Waltham; Cletus Pinto; Sendurai A Mani; Robert A Weinberg; Richard M Neve; Marc E Lenburg; Erik W Thompson Journal: J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 2.673
Authors: Howard I Scher; Xiaoyu Jia; Kim Chi; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Peter Albers; Brian Henick; David Waterhouse; Dean J Ruether; Peter J Rosen; Anthony A Meluch; Luke T Nordquist; Peter M Venner; Axel Heidenreich; Luis Chu; Glenn Heller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E Racila; D Euhus; A J Weiss; C Rao; J McConnell; L W Terstappen; J W Uhr Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-04-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Johann S de Bono; Howard I Scher; R Bruce Montgomery; Christopher Parker; M Craig Miller; Henk Tissing; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W W M Terstappen; Kenneth J Pienta; Derek Raghavan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: F J Vogelaar; G W van Pelt; A M van Leeuwen; J M Willems; R A E M Tollenaar; G J Liefers; W E Mesker Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 6.730