Literature DB >> 25001264

Biomarker validation: common data analysis concerns.

Joe E Ensor1.   

Abstract

Biomarker validation, like any other confirmatory process based on statistical methodology, must discern associations that occur by chance from those reflecting true biological relationships. Validity of a biomarker is established by authenticating its correlation with clinical outcome. Validated biomarkers can lead to targeted therapy, improve clinical diagnosis, and serve as useful prognostic and predictive factors of clinical outcome. Statistical concerns such as confounding and multiplicity are common in biomarker validation studies. This article discusses four major areas of concern in the biomarker validation process and some of the proposed solutions. Because present-day statistical packages enable the researcher to address these common concerns, the purpose of this discussion is to raise awareness of these statistical issues in the hope of improving the reproducibility of validation study findings. ©AlphaMed Press.

Keywords:  Biomarker; Confounding factors; Selection bias; Validation studies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25001264      PMCID: PMC4122484          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  29 in total

1.  Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty?

Authors:  Nick Freemantle; Melanie Calvert; John Wood; Joanne Eastaugh; Carl Griffin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Misuse of baseline comparison tests and subgroup analyses in surgical trials.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; P J Devereaux; Patricia Li; Doug Mah; Ki Lim; Holger J Schünemann; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Statistical issues in the validation of prognostic, predictive, and surrogate biomarkers.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.

Authors:  S F Assmann; S J Pocock; L E Enos; L E Kasten
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The analysis of multiple endpoints in clinical trials.

Authors:  S J Pocock; N L Geller; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Cono A Ariti; Timothy J Collier; Duolao Wang
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  Some issues with composite endpoints in clinical trials.

Authors:  George Y H Chi
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.748

Review 9.  The molecular epidemiology of lung cancer.

Authors:  S D Spivack; M J Fasco; V E Walker; L S Kaminsky
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 10.  A guide to modern statistical analysis of immunological data.

Authors:  Bernd Genser; Philip J Cooper; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Mauricio L Barreto; Laura C Rodrigues
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.615

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The search for drug-targetable diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers in chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Hong-Gang Ren; Djamilatou Adom; Sophie Paczesny
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 2.  Methods for Stratification and Validation Cohorts: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Teresa Torres Moral; Albert Sanchez-Niubo; Anna Monistrol-Mula; Chiara Gerardi; Rita Banzi; Paula Garcia; Jacques Demotes-Mainard; Josep Maria Haro
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  Independent validation test of the vote-counting strategy used to rank biomarkers from published studies.

Authors:  Brad A Rikke; Murry W Wynes; Leslie M Rozeboom; Anna E Barón; Fred R Hirsch
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 4.  Cancer Prevention: Obstacles, Challenges and the Road Ahead.

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens; Hasan Mukhtar; Cheryl L Rock; Jack Cuzick; Thomas W Kensler; Chung S Yang; Scott D Ramsey; Scott M Lippman; David S Alberts
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Pragmatic medicine in solid cancer: a translational alternative to precision medicine.

Authors:  Jan Brábek; Daniel Rosel; Michael Fernandes
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Prognostic DNA methylation markers for sporadic colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Muriel X G Draht; Danny Goudkade; Alexander Koch; Heike I Grabsch; Matty P Weijenberg; Manon van Engeland; Veerle Melotte; Kim M Smits
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 6.551

7.  Systematic identification of mutations and copy number alterations associated with cancer patient prognosis.

Authors:  Joan C Smith; Jason M Sheltzer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Drug Resistance Biomarkers and Their Clinical Applications in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Narges Aberuyi; Soheila Rahgozar; Elaheh Sadat Ghodousi; Kamran Ghaedi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Win Ratio -An Intuitive and Easy-To-Interpret Composite Outcome in Medical Studies.

Authors:  Hongyue Wang; Jing Peng; Juila Z Zheng; Bokai Wang; Xiang Lu; Chongshu Chen; Xin M Tu; Changyong Feng
Journal:  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-25

10.  Cross validated serum small extracellular vesicle microRNAs for the detection of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  G C Mayne; C M Woods; N Dharmawardana; T Wang; S Krishnan; J C Hodge; A Foreman; S Boase; A S Carney; E A W Sigston; D I Watson; E H Ooi; D J Hussey
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.