| Literature DB >> 25001209 |
Anice C Lowen1, Nicole M Bouvier, John Steel.
Abstract
The ability of an influenza virus to transmit efficiently from human-to-human is a major factor in determining the epidemiological impact of that strain. The use of a relevant animal model to identify viral determinants of transmission, as well as host and environmental factors affecting transmission efficiency, is therefore critical for public health. The characterization of newly emerging influenza viruses in terms of their potential to transmit in a mammalian host is furthermore an important part of pandemic risk assessment. For these reasons, a guinea pig model of influenza virus transmission was developed in 2006. The guinea pig provides an important alternative to preexisting models for influenza. Most influenza viruses do not readily transmit among mice. Ferrets, while highly relevant, are expensive and can be difficult to obtain in high numbers. Moreover, it is generally accepted that efforts to accurately model human disease are strengthened by the use of multiple animal species. Herein, we provide an overview of influenza virus infectivity, growth, and transmission in the guinea pig and highlight knowledge gained on the topic of influenza virus transmission using the guinea pig model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25001209 PMCID: PMC7121145 DOI: 10.1007/82_2014_390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Top Microbiol Immunol ISSN: 0070-217X Impact factor: 4.291
Fig. 1Shedding patterns of influenza viruses adapted to human, swine and avian hosts in the guinea pig model. Average viral titers detected in nasal washings collected on days 2, 4, 6, and 8 post-infection are plotted. Groups of four guinea pigs were inoculated with the indicated virus strains at a dose of 103 (human and avian isolates) or 104 (swine isolates) PFU. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Results for A/Panama/2007/1999 (H3N2), A/Netherlands/602/2009 (H1N1) and A/Texas/36/1991 (H1N1) are shown in (a); results for A/swine/Texas/4199-2/1998 (H3N2), A/swine/Spain/53207/2004 (H1N1) and A/swine/Kansas/77778/2007 (H1N1) are shown in (b); and results for A/duck/Alberta/35/1976 (H1N1), A/duck/Ukraine/1963 (H3N8), A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9) and A/Viet Nam/1203/2004 (H5N1) are shown in (c). All titers are in units of PFU/ml, except for those of A/Anhui/1/2013, which are in TCID50/ml
Transmission efficiency of influenza A and B viruses in the guinea pig model
| Virus strain | Proportion of contacts infecteda | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|
| A/Panama/2007/1999 (H3N2) | 29/29 (C), 29/32 (RD) | (Lowen et al. |
| A/Jianxi/262/2005 (H3N2) | 2/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2) | 5/8 (C) | (Lowen et al. |
| A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) | 0/13 (C) | (Ince et al. |
| A/Texas/36/1991 (H1N1) | 1/4 (RD) | (Mubareka et al. |
| A/New York/1253/2008 (H1N1) | 12/16 (C), 2/8 (RD) | (Bouvier et al. |
| A/New York/1326/2008 (H1N1) | 4/4 (C), 3/8 (RD) | (Bouvier et al. |
| A/Guandong/41/2006 (H1N1) | 1/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/Beijing/317/2009 (H1N1) | 3/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) | 11/11 (C), 20/20 (RD) | (Seibert et al. |
| A/Hansa Hamburg/01/2009 (H1N1) | 8/8 (C) | (Seibert et al. |
| A/Korea/1/2009 (H1N1) | 4/6 (C) | (Kim et al. |
| A/Netherlands/602/2009 (H1N1) | 4/4 (C), 8/8 (RD) | (Chutinimitkul et al. |
| A/Sichuan/1/2009 (H1N1) | 8/8 (RD) | (Zhang et al. |
| B/Victoria/2/1987 | 4/4 (C), 2/4 (RD) | (Pica et al. |
| B/Florida/4/2006 | 2/4 (RD) | (Pica et al. |
| A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9) | 4/4 (C) | (Gabbard et al. |
| A/Shanghai/1/2013 (H7N9) | 1/4 (RD) | (Hai et al. |
| A/Viet Nam/1203/2004 (H5N1) | 3/4 (C), 0/4 (RD) | (Steel et al. |
| A/duck/Fujian/17/2001 (H5N1) | 0/3 (C) | (Gao et al. |
| A/duck/Guangxi/22/2001 (H5N1) | 0/3 (C) | (Gao et al. |
| A/duck/Guangxi/35/2001 (H5N1) | 3/3 (C) | (Gao et al. |
| A/duck/Shanghai/13/2001 (H5N1) | 0/3 (C) | (Gao et al. |
| A/duck/Guangdong/22/2002 (H5N1) | 0/3 (C) | (Gao et al. |
| A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/3/2005 (H5N1) | 3/3 (C) | (Gao et al. |
| A/quail/Hong Kong/G1/1997 (H9N2) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/chicken/Shandong/ZB/2007 (H9N2) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/chicken/Hebei/LC/2008 (H9N2) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/chicken/Shandong/A/2009 (H9N2) | 1/3 (C), 0/3 (RD) | (Lv et al. |
| A/chicken/Shandong/M/2009 (H9N2) | 3/3 (C), 0/3 (RD) | (Lv et al. |
| A/duck/Ukraine/1/1963 (H3N8) | 0/4 (C) | (Gabbard et al. |
| A/duck/Alberta/35/1976 (H1N1) | 0/4 (C) | (Gabbard et al. |
| A/rhea/North Carolina/39482/1994 (H7N1) | 0/4 (C) | (Gabbard et al. |
| A/swine/Texas/4199-2/1998 (H3N2) | 1/4 (RD) | (Steel et al. |
| A/swine/Guangdong/7/2006 (H3N2) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/swine/Guangdong/211/2006 (H3N2) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/swine/Guangdong/811/2006 (H3N2) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/swine/Guangdong/968/2006 (H3N2) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/swine/Guangdong/1222/2006 (H1N2) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/swine/Guangdong/33/2006 (H1N1) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
| A/swine/Fujian/204/2007 (H1N1) | 0/3 (C) | (Sun et al. |
Data include those obtained under regulated conditions of 20 °C and 20 % relative humidity, and under standard animal room conditions. RD = respiratory droplet. C = contact
aAs determined by virus detection in nasal washings
Fig. 2Oseltamivir alters the kinetics of influenza virus shedding and prevents Respiratory droplet transmission in guinea pigs. Lines represent the Pan/99 virus titer in each individual guinea pig nasal wash, plotted as a function of day post-inoculation. Eight Pan/99-inoculated, oseltamivir-treated guinea pigs failed to transmit virus to a naïve partner animal, while 3 of the 4 naïve guinea pigs paired with Pan/99-inoculated, placebo-treated animals became infected by respiratory droplet transmission. Black lines and symbols represent the oseltamivir treatment group, and grey lines and symbols represent the placebo treatment group. Dotted lines and open symbols represent intranasally inoculated guinea pigs, and solid lines and closed symbols represent naïve guinea pigs exposed, starting 24 h post-inoculation, to the respiratory droplets exhaled by inoculated animals. (Unpublished data, N.M. Bouvier and M. Michta)
Fig. 3Guinea pig transmission of A/Brisbane/59/2007-like seasonal influenza A(H1N1) viruses is enhanced by expression of an oseltamivir-resistant NA. A time-to-event (Kaplan-Meier) analysis of data reported previously (Bouvier et al. 2012) demonstrates that a 7:1 reassortant encoding the oseltamivir-resistant NA typical of Brisbane/59-like sH1N1 viruses, expressed in the context of the remaining seven segments from an oseltamivir-sensitive isolate, transmits significantly more rapidly than does the oseltamivir-sensitive isolate itself, similar to the transmission kinetics of the wild-type clinical isolates themselves. Black lines represent reverse genetics-derived viruses, and grey lines represent wild-type clinical isolates. Solid lines represent viruses with an oseltamivir-resistant NA, and dotted lines represent viruses with an oseltamivir-sensitive NA. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001