Literature DB >> 25000029

Prediction of the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis using artificial neural networks.

Chun-An Cheng1, Yi-Ching Lin2, Hung-Wen Chiu2.   

Abstract

In general, around 80% of all strokes are ischemic. Take caring of the patients who have suffered an ischemic stroke is both expensive and time consuming. It is known that thrombolysis in patients with ischemic stroke can reduce the disability and increase the survival rate, however some patients still have poor outcomes. Therefore, to be able to predict the outcome of ischemic stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis would be useful while making clinical decisions. In this study, we collected retrospective data of 82 ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis from July 2005 to June 2012 in Tri-service General Hospital. Of these patients, 10 died within 3 months, and only 36 patients made a good recovery. We used STATISTICA 10 software to select the best artificial neural network. The parameters of model 1 were age, blood sugar, onset to treatment time, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, dense cerebral artery sign, and old stroke to predict 3-month outcomes. The parameters of model 2 were age, onset to treatment time, NIHSS score, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes and old stroke to predict the 3-month prognosis. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for model 1 were 77.78%, 80.43% and 79.27%, respectively, and 94.44%, 95.65% and 95.12%, respectively, for model 2. Artificial neural networks are used to establish prediction models with good performance to predict thrombolysis outcomes. These models may be able to help physicians to discuss and explain the likely outcomes to patients and their families before thrombolysis treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25000029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  6 in total

1.  Prediction of in-hospital mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Kyle M Hocking; Colleen M Brophy
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Silvia Campagnini; Chiara Arienti; Michele Patrini; Piergiuseppe Liuzzi; Andrea Mannini; Maria Chiara Carrozza
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.208

3.  Towards phenotyping stroke: Leveraging data from a large-scale epidemiological study to detect stroke diagnosis.

Authors:  Yizhao Ni; Kathleen Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Daniel Woo; Opeolu Adeoye; Matthew L Flaherty; Simona Ferioli; Jason Mackey; Felipe De Los Rios La Rosa; Sharyl Martini; Pooja Khatri; Dawn Kleindorfer; Brett M Kissela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Can miRNAs Be Considered as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Molecules in Ischemic Stroke Pathogenesis?-Current Status.

Authors:  Kirill V Bulygin; Narasimha M Beeraka; Aigul R Saitgareeva; Vladimir N Nikolenko; Ilgiz Gareev; Ozal Beylerli; Leila R Akhmadeeva; Liudmila M Mikhaleva; Luis Fernando Torres Solis; Arturo Solís Herrera; Marco F Avila-Rodriguez; Siva G Somasundaram; Cecil E Kirkland; Gjumrakch Aliev
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Stroke Disease Detection and Prediction Using Robust Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Tahia Tazin; Md Nur Alam; Nahian Nakiba Dola; Mohammad Sajibul Bari; Sami Bourouis; Mohammad Monirujjaman Khan
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Risks of Stroke and Mortality in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Rivaroxaban and Warfarin.

Authors:  Mark Alberts; Yen-Wen Chen; Jennifer H Lin; Emily Kogan; Kathryn Twyman; Dejan Milentijevic
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 7.914

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.