| Literature DB >> 24999395 |
Cortney S Warren1, David H Gleaves2, Liya M Rakhkovskaya1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the score reliability and equivalence of factor structure of the Sociocultural Attitudes towards Appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3) [1] in a sample of female college students from the four largest ethnic groups in the USA.Entities:
Keywords: Ethnicity; Media pressure; Psychometric equivalence; Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire (SATAQ-3); Thin-ideal internalization
Year: 2013 PMID: 24999395 PMCID: PMC4081787 DOI: 10.1186/2050-2974-1-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Eat Disord ISSN: 2050-2974
Means (SDs) and ANOVAs examining demographic and outcome variables by ethnic group
| Age | 21.30 (5.91)a | 21.21 (5.44)a | 20.60 (4.89) | 19.65 (2.80)b | 7.42 | <.01 | .02 |
| BMI | 23.60 (5.09)a | 24.73 (6.46)a | 23.88 (5.48)a | 22.24 (3.75)b | 9.63 | <.01 | .02 |
| INFO | 25.97 (10.16)a | 26.99 (10.19) | 26.68 (10.20) | 28.59 (9.81)b | 4.54 | <.01 | .01 |
| PRESS | 22.23 (8.79)a | 17.37 (9.20)b | 20.72 (8.93)a | 20.84 (8.48)a | 11.44 | <.01 | .03 |
| INT-GEN | 30.28 (10.34)a | 22.44 (10.89)b | 27.88 (10.73)c | 28.89 (10.24)ac | 21.04 | <.01 | .05 |
| INT-ATH | 17.07 (5.11)a | 13.56 (6.04)b | 15.77 (5.28)c | 15.75 (5.19)c | 17.52 | <.01 | .04 |
Note. Means in the same row that do not share subscripts differ at p < .05 on post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction. BMI = Body Mass Index; INFO = Information; PRESS = Perceived Pressure; INT-GEN = Thin-ideal Internalization; INT-ATH = Athletic-ideal Internalization.
Congruence coefficients and Cronbach’s alpha values (α) by subscale and ethnicity
| INFO | | | | | | |
| | 1. European Am | - | .99* | .99* | .99* | .97 |
| | 2. African Am | | - | .98 | .98 | .96 |
| | 3. Latina | | | - | .99* | .96 |
| | 4. Asian Am | | | | - | .96 |
| PRESS | | | | | | |
| | 1. European Am | - | .96 | .98 | .98 | .96 |
| | 2. African Am | | - | 96 | .96 | .98 |
| | 3. Latina | | | - | .98 | .96 |
| | 4. Asian Am | | | | - | .95 |
| INT-GEN | | | | | | |
| | 1. European Am | - | .96 | .98 | .96 | .96 |
| | 2. African Am | | - | .95 | .91 | .96 |
| | 3. Latina | | | - | .97 | .96 |
| | 4. Asian Am | | | | - | .96 |
| INT-ATH | | | | | | |
| | 1. European Am | - | .99* | .98 | .99* | .89 |
| | 2. African Am | | - | 99 | .98 | .99* |
| | 3. Latina | | | - | .98 | .89 |
| 4. Asian Am | - | .90 |
Note. Congruence coefficients are based on factor analysis results whereas the alphas are based on traditional scoring by Thompson and colleagues (2004).
Rotated factor loadings by ethnic group and subscale
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1 | -.03 | . | -.02 | -.04 | -.07 | -.01 | -.06 | .05 | -.08 | -.05 | .06 | .02 | .13 | |||
| 5 | -.05 | . | -.00 | .08 | -.03 | .05 | -.06 | .01 | -.04 | -.05 | .07 | .02 | .10 | |||
| 9 | .02 | . | .05 | -.07 | .07 | .03 | .00 | -.06 | .07 | -.04 | -.09 | .02 | -.15 | |||
| 13 | .05 | . | -.04 | -.06 | .06 | .02 | .00 | -.06 | .03 | .03 | -.09 | -.06 | -.18 | |||
| 17 | -.04 | . | .00 | .03 | .09 | -.10 | .05 | .01 | -.04 | .04 | -.07 | -.04 | -.10 | |||
| 21 | .00 | . | .03 | -.02 | .01 | -.03 | -.00 | .09 | -.03 | .07 | -.05 | -.05 | -.08 | |||
| 25 | .06 | . | -.01 | .01 | .01 | .06 | .07 | .04 | .01 | -.01 | .13 | -.03 | .05 | |||
| 28 | .04 | . | .02 | .08 | -.01 | .07 | .07 | -.05 | .07 | -.04 | .04 | .08 | .00 | |||
| 29 | .07 | . | .00 | .05 | .06 | .05 | .08 | -.03 | .07 | -.04 | .05 | .10 | .05 | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2 | -.02 | .00 | -.04 | .02 | .07 | -.09 | -.01 | -.03 | -.05 | -.07 | .03 | -.12 | ||||
| 6 | .21 | .09 | -.07 | -.01 | .20 | -.02 | .02 | -.07 | -.29 | .10 | -.05 | -.09 | ||||
| 10 | .08 | -.02 | -.02 | .03 | -.06 | -.02 | -.03 | -.04 | -.10 | -.05 | .01 | .03 | ||||
| 14 | .20 | -.01 | .09 | .01 | .01 | .05 | .06 | -.10 | .13 | .00 | -.21 | |||||
| 18 | -.11 | .01 | .07 | -.02 | -.08 | .10 | .01 | .03 | .06 | -.01 | .10 | -.08 | ||||
| 22 | -.04 | -.01 | .13 | .03 | -.02 | .16 | .02 | .16 | .10 | .08 | .13 | .02 | ||||
| 26 | .06 | .08 | .00 | .03 | .04 | .00 | .07 | .01 | -.07 | .07 | -.01 | -.25 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | -.02 | -.00 | .11 | .15 | -.08 | .03 | .21 | .16 | -.02 | .13 | .03 | -.03 | ||||
| 4 | .06 | .04 | .10 | -.03 | -.03 | .03 | .06 | .03 | -.03 | -.04 | .12 | .11 | ||||
| 7 | -.00 | -.01 | -.04 | .04 | .05 | -.06 | .13 | .09 | -.16 | .24 | .06 | -.03 | ||||
| 8 | .08 | -.02 | .03 | -.02 | -.02 | .05 | -.03 | -.03 | .01 | .07 | .19 | .07 | ||||
| 11 | -.03 | .04 | -.06 | .05 | .02 | -.04 | .11 | .02 | .09 | -.00 | .03 | .10 | ||||
| 12 | .02 | .01 | .04 | -.02 | .01 | .11 | .07 | .02 | .06 | .22 | -.02 | .04 | ||||
| 15 | .04 | .09 | .02 | .06 | -.00 | .05 | .07 | .19 | .19 | .03 | -.09 | .05 | ||||
| 16 | .07 | .00 | .02 | .03 | .01 | .10 | .01 | .09 | .02 | .20 | .10 | .11 | ||||
| 27 | .13 | .29 | .35 | .12 | .06 | .35 | .36 | .18 | .14 | -.25 | .17 | .03 | .06 | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 19 | .26 | -.04 | .13 | .30 | .04 | . | .03 | .19 | .01 | -.17 | -.01 | .05 | -.30 | |||
| 20 | .26 | .02 | .17 | . | -.10 | .26 | .01 | .06 | .02 | .34 | .20 | .10 | -.17 | |||
| 23 | .01 | -.02 | -.06 | -.10 | .12 | .11 | .05 | .01 | .03 | .11 | -.04 | .08 | ||||
| 24 | .03 | .01 | -.02 | .10 | -.03 | -.05 | -.08 | -.04 | -.26 | -.11 | .03 | -.07 | ||||
| 30 | -.08 | .08 | .06 | -.01 | .10 | .09 | .09 | .09 | .10 | .04 | .01 | .02 | ||||
Note. Items are organized by the four subscales identified by Thompson et al., 2004. Specifically, INFO = Information; PRESS = Perceived Pressure; GEN = Thin-ideal Internalization; ATH = Athletic-ideal Internalization. Items with factor loadings ≥ .40 are in bold.