Literature DB >> 24998776

Novel TBX1 loss-of-function mutation causes isolated conotruncal heart defects in Chinese patients without 22q11.2 deletion.

Yue-Juan Xu, Sun Chen, Jian Zhang, Shao-Hai Fang, Qian-Qian Guo, Jian Wang, Qi-Hua Fu, Fen Li, Rang Xu1, Kun Sun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: TBX1 and CRKL haploinsufficiency is thought to cause the cardiac phenotype of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. However, few unequivocal mutations of TBX1 and CRKL have been discovered in isolated conotrucal heart defects (CTDs) patients. The aim of the study was to screen the mutation of TBX1 and CRKL in isolated CTDs Chinese patients without 22q11.2 deletion and identify the pathomechanism of the missense mutations.
METHODS: We enrolled 199 non-22q11.2 deletion patients with CTDs and 139 unrelated healthy controls. Gene sequencing were performed for all of them. The functional data of mutations were obtained by in vitro transfection and luciferase experiments and computer modelling.
RESULTS: Screening of the TBX1 coding sequence identified a de novo missense mutation (c.385G → A; p.E129K) and a known polymorphism (c.928G → A; p.G310S). In vitro experiments demonstrate that the TBX1E129K variant almost lost transactivation activity. The TBX1G310S variant seems to affect the interaction of TBX1 with other factors. Computer molecular dynamics simulations showed the de novo missense mutation is likely to affect TBX1-DNA interaction. No mutation of CRKL gene was found.
CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that the TBX1 loss-of-function mutation may be involved in the pathogenesis of isolated CTDs. This is the first human missense mutation showing that TBX1 is a candidate causing isolated CTDs in Chinese patients without 22q11.2 deletion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24998776      PMCID: PMC4099205          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-15-78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genet        ISSN: 1471-2350            Impact factor:   2.103


Background

Congenital heart defects (CHDs), consisting of heterogeneous anatomy with distinct phenotypic subtypes, are the most common human birth defects worldwide, affecting nearly 0.8% of live births. Of these cases, 15 ~ 20% are CTDs [1]. CTDs are severe malformations associated with cyanosis and many other serious manifestations of hypoxia and are characterised by a disordered orchestration of the ventricle, the aorta and the pulmonary artery. They include tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), double outlet of right ventricle (DORV), pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (PA/VSD), transposition of the great arteries (TGA), interrupted aortic arch (IAA), and persistent truncus arteriosus (PTA), leading to cardiac enlargement, ventricular dysfunction, poor quality of life, and even sudden death in the absence of surgical treatment. The pathogenesis of CTDs is heterogeneous and involves multiple genes and environmental factors. Although our understanding of molecular pathways in cardiac development has grown remarkably in the past few years, the aetiology of human CHDs cannot be identified or explained in the majority of cases [2]. Caused by a heterozygous multi-gene deletion, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is a relatively common genetic disorder (1:4000 live births). CTDs are a prominent part of the 22q11DS phenotype, with a frequency of approximately 75% in 22q11DS patients. Reports originating from Western countries associate 12.8-17.8% of CTDs to the del22q11, and our own work showed a lower incidence (6.13%) in Chinese CTDs patients [3]. The TBX1 gene, a member of a phylogenetically conserved T-box gene family of DNA-binding transcription factors, is mapped to the 22q11.2, and is hypothesised to be responsible for the cardiac phenotype of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Mutations of the TBX1 gene have been detected in some patients featuring DGS/VCFS who are otherwise devoid of the 22q11.2 deletion [4]. Mutational analysis in nonsyndromic CTDs patients only detected a insertion of 30 bp within exon 9c of TBX1, caused polyalanine stretches [5,6]. To better address the issue of the link between TBX1 and isolated CTDs, we performed TBX1 gene sequencing in a large sample of Chinese isolated CTDs patients without 22q11.2 deletion. CRKL(CRK-Like), another gene located within the 22q11.2 and expressed in the developing heart, was found to be deleted in a few CTDs patients with atypical distal 22q11.2 deletions not including TBX1 [7,8]. The Crkl mice embryos had DORV, VSD [9,10]. Crkl and Tbx1 genetically interact, and developmental defects associated with loss of Crkl and Tbx1 were linked to two major signalling pathways (RA and Fgf8) during embryonic development in model organisms [10,11]. These lines of evidence led us to hypothesize that mutations of CRKL may also be implicated in the pathogenesis of human CTDs. To test this hypothesis, we sequenced the exons and the flanking areas of CRKL gene in all CTDs patients in our cohort.

Methods

Ethics statement

All the assessments were performed with the approval of the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Children’s Medical Centre (SCMC) and the Medical Ethics Committee of Xinhua hospital. All written informed consent was obtained from the parents of each patient and control.

Subjects

The patients were recruited prospectively in SCMC from June 2008 to December 2009. The cardiac phenotype was confirmed by angiocardiography and echocardiography in all the patients. When available, the surgical operative notes were reviewed. Of 212 CTDs patients, 199 (78 female, 121 male; median age 2.1 years) were enrolled because they were negative for the 22q11.2 microdeletion when tested by MLPA using the SALSA P250-A1 MLPA-DiGeorge syndrome test kit (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [3]. They included 70 TOF, 50 DORV, 28 PA/VSD, 28 TGA, 4 IAA and 2 PTA patients, as well as 17 other cases of conotruncal malformations (11 single ventricle with malposition of great arteries (SV/MGA), 4 hypoplastic right heart syndrome (HDHS), 2 coarctation of aorta (CoA)). The clinical information of 199 patients was examined by trained clinicians and none of them had extracardiac anomalies and features suggestive of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. All of the subjects were of Han ethnicity. Parental informed consent was obtained for all of the patients enrolled before blood samples were drawn at the time of catheterisation. A total of 139 unrelated Han Chinese children (57 female, 83 male; median age 7.43 years; all physically and mentally healthy) were included as normal controls. We detected the cardiac morphology of these controls by transthoracic echocardiography and confirmed they were normal. After obtaining informed written parental consent, a peripheral venous blood sample was obtained, and the genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral lymphocytes using a QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Duesseldorf, Germany).

Sequencing

The coding regions of the three alternative spliced forms of the TBX1A, TBX1B, TBX1C (Figure 1A) and CRKL were sequenced in the 199 CTDs patients and 139 controls. We designed primers that amplify all exons and flanking intronic sequences. The primers (Table 1) were designed following the corresponding genomic regions available in the Genbank database (TBX1, NG_009229.10; CRKL, NG_016354.1) using Primers3 software (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3/). The PCR was performed with the genomic DNA and the products were sequencing on an ABI 3130 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The sequence traces were aligned with the reference sequence using the GenBank BLAST program (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).
Figure 1

The screening results of the coding sequence. (A) Schematic representation of the TBX1 gene. The conserved T-box domain is marked with yellow squares and spans exons 3-7. The two variants described in this paper are indicated by black arrows. (B) Shown at the left are the DNA sequences of the 385G → A mutation (upper panel) and the wild-type TBX1 sequence (lower panel). The fragment was sequenced from forward and reverse directions. Shown at the right is the homologues sequence alignment of a part of the T-box domain of TBX1 from various vertebrates. (C) Shown on the left are the DNA sequences of the TBX1 gene with a 928G → A change. The three electropherograms show the homozygote AA, heterozygote GA, and homozygote GG. The homologues sequence alignment is shown at the right. The conserved amino acids are shown with a grey background, and residue 129 and 310 is indicated with a black box.

Table 1

Primer sequences used to amplify and sequence all the coding exons of the and gene and exon/intron boundaries

PrimersOrientationSequencesFragment size
TBX1-EXON1
F
5’-AGGAGCAGATGTCTCAGCCC-3’
594 bp
R
5’-CACCGGCTGCCTATACTCAC-3’
TBX1-EXON2
F
5’-ATGACGCCATAATCCTCTGG-3’
725 bp
R
5’-TGTGTTTTCTCCCCTTTGCT-3’
TBX1-EXON3
F
5’-TCACGCAGCTCTCGCATTTC-3’
628 bp
R
5’-CCGGCGGAGGATAGGTGTTA-3’
TBX1-EXON4
F
5’-CAAGCTCCCAGTTGAGTAGG-3’
414 bp
R
5’-GCAGGTGCCTAAAGAGTTTC-3’
TBX1-EXON5
F
5’-GGCAGCAGAGGGTTCAATCT-3’
457 bp
R
5’-GCCTCGCAGGGACTCTAAAG-3’
TBX1-EXON6
F
5’-TGACCCAGCCTCATCTTGGA-3’
404 bp
R
5’-AGGTCTAAGCGGACCCACTG-3’
TBX1-EXON7-8
F
5’-GGTGCGCTTCTCCTAACACTC-3’
722 bp
R
5’-GGAGAGGGCCGAGGAGTG-3’
TBX1-EXON9C
F
5’-CCAAGAGCCTTCTCTCCGC-3’
775 bp
R
5’-TGGGGAACCGGATACTTCGA-3’
TBX1-EXON9A
F
5’-CGTTGGGAGATGCAGTCCT-3’
853 bp
R
5’-GCTTACTGGACAGCAGCAC-3’
TBX1-EXON9B
F
5’-CTGATGGTGTGTGAGGCTGA-3’
636 bp
R
5’-CACCTCTTGCATGCACACTT-3’
TBX1-EXON10
F
5’-CTGCTCTGTTTGAGGTGGTT-3’
632 bp
R
5’-ACGCATCAGCTTTTATGGGA-3’
CRKL-EXON1_1
F
5’- GACGGTGCTCCTGATTGGCT-3’
747 bp
R
5’-CCCAGGGCAGGTGGAAGAAT-3’
CRKL-EXON1_2
F
5’-GGACAGCCGCCGCCCCTACC-3’
434 bp
R
5’-CCCACCCCCCTATACAAGCA-3’
CRKL-EXON2
F
5’-CAGTGAGCTAAGATCACGCT-3’
677 bp
R
5’-ATGTCAAAGGACCCAAAAAG-3’
CRKL-EXON3
F
5’-AAGGATCACTTGAGCCCAGG-3’
376 bp
 R5’-AGGCAGAACAACAAAGCAGC-3’ 
The screening results of the coding sequence. (A) Schematic representation of the TBX1 gene. The conserved T-box domain is marked with yellow squares and spans exons 3-7. The two variants described in this paper are indicated by black arrows. (B) Shown at the left are the DNA sequences of the 385G → A mutation (upper panel) and the wild-type TBX1 sequence (lower panel). The fragment was sequenced from forward and reverse directions. Shown at the right is the homologues sequence alignment of a part of the T-box domain of TBX1 from various vertebrates. (C) Shown on the left are the DNA sequences of the TBX1 gene with a 928G → A change. The three electropherograms show the homozygote AA, heterozygote GA, and homozygote GG. The homologues sequence alignment is shown at the right. The conserved amino acids are shown with a grey background, and residue 129 and 310 is indicated with a black box. Primer sequences used to amplify and sequence all the coding exons of the and gene and exon/intron boundaries

Plasmid constructs

The TBX1 expression vector containing the cDNA of human TBX1C was purchased from Origene (Rockville, MD, USA). The TBX1 cDNA was digested and inserted into the plasmid pcDNA3.1(+) at the KpnI and XhoI sites. The mutant expression vectors were generated by use of site-directed mutagenesis performed according to the protocol provided by the Quickchange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, California, USA), and the wild-type pcDNA3.1-TBX1 was used as the template. Four conserved T-half sites “ATTTCACACCT” were oriented head to tail, similar to those reported by Sinha et al.[12] and were synthesised and subcloned into the KpnI − HindIII sites in the pGL4.25 [luc2CP/minP] plasmid (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) to generate the 4XT/2-minP reporter construct (Figure 2A). The sequence and orientation of the luciferase reporter were verified by DNA sequencing.
Figure 2

Transcriptional activation of luciferase reporter constructs by the wild-type and mutant TBX1. (A) Schematic diagram of 4XT/2-minP reporter construct. Four conserved T-half sites “ATTTCACACCT” were oriented head to tail, synthesised and subcloned into the KpnI − HindIII sites in the pGL4.25 [luc2CP/minP] plasmid. (B) and (C) show that the 293 T or COS7 cells were co-transfected with the 4XT/2-minP reporter construct containing the T-box binding elements and either a pcDNA3.1 (+) control vector (Blank), the TBX1 wild-type construct, or the mutant constructs. The results were normalized for transfection efficiency to a co-transfected renilla luciferase vector and are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Transcriptional activation of luciferase reporter constructs by the wild-type and mutant TBX1. (A) Schematic diagram of 4XT/2-minP reporter construct. Four conserved T-half sites “ATTTCACACCT” were oriented head to tail, synthesised and subcloned into the KpnI − HindIII sites in the pGL4.25 [luc2CP/minP] plasmid. (B) and (C) show that the 293 T or COS7 cells were co-transfected with the 4XT/2-minP reporter construct containing the T-box binding elements and either a pcDNA3.1 (+) control vector (Blank), the TBX1 wild-type construct, or the mutant constructs. The results were normalized for transfection efficiency to a co-transfected renilla luciferase vector and are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Transfection and Luciferase assays

The transient transfection was performed with FuGENE HD transfection reagent (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for adherent cells. The HEK293T and COS7 cells were maintained in DMEM medium (Invitrogen, California, USA) with 10% foetal calf serum (Invitrogen, California, USA) and were then co-transfected with 100 ng of the wild-type or mutant TBX1 constructs, 500 ng of the 4XT/2-minP reporter construct, and a renilla luciferase pGL4.74 [hRluc/TK] vector (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The cells were harvested 40 h after transfection. The firefly and renilla luciferase activity were measured using the Dual Luciferase Kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) and the Centro XS3 LB 960 Microplate Luminometer (Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The activity of the firefly luciferase was normalised to that of renilla luciferase. The results shown are the mean ± s.e.m of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of wild-type and mutant TBX1

Based on the X-ray crystal structures (PDB entry: 4A04, resolution 2.1 Å) [13], the models of TBX1 and its mutant for the MD simulations were built in Sybyl version 6.8 (Tripos Inc., St. Louis, MO). First, the sidechains with missing coordinates were reconstructed using the fragment library of the Biopolymer module; then the modified structures were subjected to energy minimization in the Minimize module using the Powell method up to the gradient tolerance of 0.05 kcal/(mol · Å) to relieve possible steric clashes and overlaps of side chains. The 3D structural model of the mutant TBX1 was built up using the xLeap module in the AMBER suite (version 8.0) [14]. MD simulations were conducted on the two systems of wild-type and mutant TBX1 using the AMBER suite of programs (version 8.0) with the parm99 force field [15]. Each structure was prepared by using the xLeap module in AMBER, in which protons were added to the structure and all inoizable side-chains were maintained in their standard protonation states at pH7.0. A truncated octahedral box of TIP3P waters was added with a 10 Å buffer around the complex and counterions were added to maintain the electroneutrality of the two systems. To avoid the instability that might occur during the MD simulations, the solvated systems were subjected to minimization for 5000 cycles with protein restrained and followed by another 5000 cycles with the whole systems relaxed. Then, the systems were gradually heated from 0 K to 300 K during the first 60 ps by three intervals, followed by equilibrium for 80 ps under constant volume and temperature condition. Afterwards, the systems were switched to constant pressure and temperature condition and equilibrated for 100 ps to adjust the systems to a correct density. Finally, the production simulations were carried out in the absence of any restraint and two 5-ns MD simulations were then conducted on the wild-type and mutant TBX1 to probe the function of the mutation. All the MD simulations were performed using the parallel version of PMEMD in the AMBER suite. The long-range electrostatic interactions were calculated using the particle mesh Ewald method, whereas the SHAKE algorithm was employed to fix the lengths of the bonds involving hydrogen atoms [16,17]. During the simulations, the integration time step of 2 fs was adopted and structural snapshots were flushed every 500 steps (1 ps). The non-bonded cut-off was set to 10.0 Å, and the non-bonded pair list was updated every 25 steps. By applying the Berendsen algorithm, each production simulation was coupled to a 300 K thermal bath at 1.0 atm pressure [18]. The temperature and pressure coupling constants were set to 2.0 ps and 1.0 ps, respectively [14].

Results

Mutation screening of the TBX1 and CRKL gene in CTDs patients without 22q11.2 deletion

Screening of the TBX1 coding sequence identified a de novo variant, as well as one known polymorphism G310S (Figure 1). The de novo mutation is localised in exon 3 (c.385G → A; p.E129K) in heterozygosis (Figure 1B). The patient was a 12 years old boy at the time of initial admission to SCMC and suffered from PA/VSD and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). His height was 152 cm, and weight 50 kg on admission. His appearance looked normal. He didn’t show mental retardation. Due to cardiac problem, he did not finish primary school. Unfortunately he lost the opportunity to operation because of pulmonary hypertension and died at the age of 13. His parents are non-consanguineous marriage. The mutation was not observed in both of his normal parents. The E129K mutation, involving conversion from an acidic amino acid residue (Glu) to an alkaline amino acid residue (Lys), occurs within the evolutionarily conserved T-box domain in the highly conserved residue found in TBX1 orthologues of human, chimpanzee, rat, mouse, cattle, chicken, Xenopus, and Danio rerio (Figure 1B).We also detected a homozygous single nucleotide polymorphism c.928G → A; p.G310S in one male patient with HDHS, TA, VSD, TGA, pulmonary stenosis (PS), and atrial septal defect (ASD). His parents, who were verified to be carriers of heterozygosis, had no cardiac phenotype. The heterozygous variant was detected in 15 CTDs patients and seven normal controls. The G310S is located near the C-terminal of the T-box domain and conserved in the TBX1 vertebrate orthologues of humans, chimpanzees, rats, mice, Xenopus, and Danio rerios, but not in cattle and chickens (Figure 1C). We sequenced PCR products containing coding exons from CRKL using the sanger method, and no mutations were detected.

Functional analysis of the mutations

To examine further the functional significance of the detected mutations in TBX1, we engineered the c.385G → A (p.E129K) mutation in the human TBX1 cDNA. The non-synonymous SNP c.928G → A (p.G310S) was constructed simultaneously. The polymorphism G310S showed no significant effect on the transcriptional activation in our assay, in contrast to the wild-type TBX1. It exhibited a slight decrease in transactivation relative to the wild-type in the 293 T cell line, yet a slight increase in transactivation in the COS7 cell line. The novel missense mutation E129K showed significantly reduced transcriptional activity in the 293 T and COS7 cells lines in our assay compared with the wild-type protein (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B and 2C).

Molecular models and MD simulations of wild-type and mutant TBX1

To interpret the effect of the point mutation E129K on the TBX1 function, we modelled the structure of the TBX1 DNA binding domain on the basis of the TBX1 DNA crystal structure (PDB code 4A04) using Sybyl version 6.8 (Tripos Inc. St. Louis. MO) and the structural model of TBX1E129K using the xLeap module in the AMBER suite (version 8.0). Residue glutamic acid 129 (E129) is an evolutionarily conserved residue within the T-box domain (Figure 3). It is clear from the structure that E129, which sits on a beta strand, interacts with tryptophan 179 (W179), glutamine 277 (Q277) and lysine 285 (K285) by forming hydrogen bonds (Figure 4C). Q277 and K285 are located at the helix-turn-helix motif on the C-terminal of the protein, which is involved in recognising the DNA through its minor groove [15]. The terminal negative charges of the side-chain in the E129 acidic residue are replaced with positive charges (K129, alkaline) in the mutant E129K-TBX1 (Figure 4A and B), leading to a complete disruption of the hydrogen bonds between E129 and its surrounding residues (Figure 4C and D) and a distortion of the binding interface between the TBX1 and DNA (Figure 4B), which may have a negative effect on the protein-DNA interaction and thus the associated transcriptional activation/inhibition functions.
Figure 3

The phylogenetic sequence alignment of the T-box domain and 20 additional amino acids from different species located at the N and C terminus of the T-box domain. The phylogenetic analysis is from vertebrate mammals to marine zooplankton. The aminoacid residues that are identical to the TBX1 sequences are shaded. The red pentagram demonstrates the amino acid substitutions of E129K and G310S in the TBX1 found in patients. The dotted line indicated the T-box domain.

Figure 4

Schematic diagram of TBX1 bound to DNA. (A) The wild type TBX1 structure with E129 is shown as sticks. (B) The superimposed structures between the wild-type TBX1 (cyan) and the TBX1E129K (grey) and the carbon atoms from E129 and its mutant K129 are colored in green and yellow, respectively, and the conformations are extracted from the end of the 5-ns simulations. (C) Local interactions with E129 in the wild-type TBX1. (D) Local interactions with K129 in the mutant TBX1. The hydrogen bonds around E129/K129 are shown as dashed lines.

The phylogenetic sequence alignment of the T-box domain and 20 additional amino acids from different species located at the N and C terminus of the T-box domain. The phylogenetic analysis is from vertebrate mammals to marine zooplankton. The aminoacid residues that are identical to the TBX1 sequences are shaded. The red pentagram demonstrates the amino acid substitutions of E129K and G310S in the TBX1 found in patients. The dotted line indicated the T-box domain. Schematic diagram of TBX1 bound to DNA. (A) The wild type TBX1 structure with E129 is shown as sticks. (B) The superimposed structures between the wild-type TBX1 (cyan) and the TBX1E129K (grey) and the carbon atoms from E129 and its mutant K129 are colored in green and yellow, respectively, and the conformations are extracted from the end of the 5-ns simulations. (C) Local interactions with E129 in the wild-type TBX1. (D) Local interactions with K129 in the mutant TBX1. The hydrogen bonds around E129/K129 are shown as dashed lines.

Discussion

The TBX1 gene is a member of the T-box gene family of transcription factors that is characterised by a conserved DNA binding domain throughout the metazoan evolution [19]. The members of the T-box gene family play a crucial role in a wide variety of developmental processes in vertebrate and invertebrate embryos [20]. The biological importance of these genes is emphasised by the phenotypes of the patient carried loss-of-function mutations of TBX3 and TBX5[21-23]. TBX1 haploinsufficiency has long been known to be crucial in the aetiology of 22q11DS. Mutation analysis has revealed frameshift and missense mutations of TBX1 in patients with the 22q11DS-phenotype, but no detectable deletion [4,24,25]. Animal model experimental evidence suggests that Tbx1 is required for normal heart development [26,27]; however, no unequivocal mutation of TBX1 has been discovered in isolated CTDs patients. Tbx1 is expressed in the secondary heart field (SHF) and positively regulates SHF cell proliferation and contribution to the muscle layer of outflow tract (OFT), of which the myocardium derives from the SHF [28-30]. We investigated a cohort of isolated CTD patients without 22q11.2 deletion and identified one novel mutation (E129K) of TBX1. E129K, located within the conserved T domain, is predicted to affect TBX1-DNA interaction on the basis of the structures of DNA-bound wild-type or mutant TBX1 (Figure 3). This finding is in line with the experimental data showing that in our transient transfection and luciferase reporter assays, the TBX1E129K variant has almost lost transactivation activity for the transcription directed from the consensus palindromic DNA-binding site (Figure 2B and C). The T-box genes are exquisitely dose-sensitive and often act in a combinatorial or hierarchical fashion [26,31]. The T-box domain, as the basic characteristic of the T-box family, is a DNA-binding region and a protein-protein interaction domain for other transcription factors, chromatin remodelling complexes and histone-modifying enzymes [31]. It has been suggested that Tbx1 interacts with the BAF chromatin remodelling complex and histone methylases to regulate transcription [32]. The known variant, G310S, positioned in a conserved region downstream to the T-box domain, was found in our CTDs patients and healthy controls. The TBX1G310S variant exhibits opposite behaviour in the 293 T and COS7 cell lines. In the 293 T cell line, the variant partially loses the transactivation on reporter with the conserved half-T sites (Figure 2B), whereas it slightly enhances the transactivation in the COS7 cell line (Figure 2C). Prior studies have reported that the TBX1G310S variant prevents TBX1-SMAD1 interaction that could not affect by the mutations that abolish transactivation [33]. We hypothesise that there may be a critical region for protein-protein interaction that resides downstream to the T-box region, and the different behaviour of the TBX1G310S mutant in the 293 T and COS7 cell lines may be caused by the distinct cofactors for TBX1 function in those cells. Although the heterozygous variant was found in the patients and controls, the homozygote was only detected in a patient with complex CHD. We cannot exclude that the TBX1G310S mutant protein might have an effect on the pathogenesis of congenital malformations. CRKL gene lies within the typically 3 Mb deleted region in 22q11DS patients. CRKL encodes an SH2-SH3-SH3 adaptor protein, and is part of a signalling pathway that includes Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and MAP kinases (ERK1 and ERK2) [34]. The embryonic phenotypes of murine neural crest conditional knockout of Fak or Crkl are similar and show cardiac outflow tract abnormalities [10,11,34]. These experimental observations indicate that the Fak-Crkl-Erk signalling pathway is critical important for cardiac outflow tract development. However, only four patients with CTDs have been reported with atypical distal 22q11.2 deletion that involves CRKL, but not TBX1 so far [8]. Sequencing analysis of the alleles or the remaining allele failed to identify a CRKL mutation [8,35]. In our study, CRKL was sequenced in 199 CTDs patients without extracardiac anomalies, and we also failed to detect a mutation. We therefore speculate that the coding region mutation of CRKL gene may not implicated in the pathogenesis of CTDs. We recognize some weaknesses that are inherent to our study. We only sequenced the coding region and flanking areas between exons and introns. In genome, non-coding regions (promoter regions and regulatory elements) play an important role on gene expression. Further studies are needed to be carried out to clarify the link between variants in non-coding regions and the pathogenesis of CTDs.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that a novel TBX1 nucleotide sequence variant is a mutation that might be involved in the pathogenesis of isolated CTDs in non-22q11.2 deletion patients, based on the results of sequence alignment and functional analysis of the mutants. The novel TBX1E129K mutant, hypothesised to have loss-of-function status, may cause heart defects by haploinsufficiency. Other than the E129K mutation, the known TBX1G310S variant seems to affect the interaction of TBX1 with other factors.

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ contributions

YJX and SC collected the samples, performed most of the experiments, and draft the manuscript. JZ built up the three-dimensional structural model of TBX1 and provided Figure 4. SHX and QQG helped with luciferase experiments. JW help to collect samples and screen the individuals. QHF and FL participated in the design of the study. RX and KS conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, analyzed the data and helped draft and revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/15/78/prepub
  31 in total

1.  Differential DNA binding and transcription modulation by three T-box proteins, T, TBX1 and TBX2.

Authors:  S Sinha; S Abraham; R M Gronostajski; C E Campbell
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-11-27       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Human gene copy number spectra analysis in congenital heart malformations.

Authors:  Aoy Tomita-Mitchell; Donna K Mahnke; Craig A Struble; Maureen E Tuffnell; Karl D Stamm; Mats Hidestrand; Susan E Harris; Mary A Goetsch; Pippa M Simpson; David P Bick; Ulrich Broeckel; Andrew N Pelech; James S Tweddell; Michael E Mitchell
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 3.  Mechanisms of T-box gene function in the developing heart.

Authors:  Franziska Greulich; Carsten Rudat; Andreas Kispert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  Mutation analysis of TBX1 in non-deleted patients with features of DGS/VCFS or isolated cardiovascular defects.

Authors:  W Gong; S Gottlieb; J Collins; A Blescia; H Dietz; E Goldmuntz; D M McDonald-McGinn; E H Zackai; B S Emanuel; D A Driscoll; M L Budarf
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  DiGeorge subtypes of nonsyndromic conotruncal defects: evidence against a major role of TBX1 gene.

Authors:  Emanuela Conti; Nicoletta Grifone; Anna Sarkozy; Caterina Tandoi; Bruno Marino; Maria Cristina Digilio; Rita Mingarelli; Antonio Pizzuti; Bruno Dallapiccola
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Phenotypic variability of atypical 22q11.2 deletions not including TBX1.

Authors:  Judith M A Verhagen; Karin E M Diderich; Grétel Oudesluijs; Grazia M S Mancini; Alex J Eggink; Anna C Verkleij-Hagoort; Irene A L Groenenberg; Patrick J Willems; Frederik A du Plessis; Stella A de Man; Malgorzata I Srebniak; Diane van Opstal; Lorette O M Hulsman; Laura J C M van Zutven; Marja W Wessels
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  SUMO1 modification of PTEN regulates tumorigenesis by controlling its association with the plasma membrane.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Jie Yan; Jian Zhang; Shiguo Zhu; Yanli Wang; Ting Shi; Changhong Zhu; Cheng Chen; Xin Liu; Jinke Cheng; Tomas Mustelin; Gen-Sheng Feng; Guoqiang Chen; Jianxiu Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Comprehensive genotype-phenotype analysis in 230 patients with tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Ralf Rauch; Michael Hofbeck; Christiane Zweier; Andreas Koch; Stefan Zink; Udo Trautmann; Juliane Hoyer; Renate Kaulitz; Helmut Singer; Anita Rauch
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Detecting 22q11.2 deletion in Chinese children with conotruncal heart defects and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the haploid TBX1 locus.

Authors:  Yue-Juan Xu; Jian Wang; Rang Xu; Peng-Jun Zhao; Xi-Ke Wang; Heng-Juan Sun; Li-Ming Bao; Jie Shen; Qi-Hua Fu; Fen Li; Kun Sun
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.103

10.  Transcriptional control in cardiac progenitors: Tbx1 interacts with the BAF chromatin remodeling complex and regulates Wnt5a.

Authors:  Li Chen; Filomena Gabriella Fulcoli; Rosa Ferrentino; Stefania Martucciello; Elizabeth A Illingworth; Antonio Baldini
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  13 in total

1.  Mutation Analysis of TBX1 in Children with Conotruncal Heart Anomalies.

Authors:  Teena Koshy; Vettriselvi Venkatesan; Kalpana Gowrishankar; Venkatachalam Perumal; Shruthi Mohan; Solomon Franklin Durairaj Paul
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Heterozygous Mutations in TBX1 as a Cause of Isolated Hypoparathyroidism.

Authors:  Dong Li; Christopher T Gordon; Myriam Oufadem; Jeanne Amiel; Harsh S Kanwar; Marina Bakay; Tiancheng Wang; Hakon Hakonarson; Michael A Levine
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  TBX1 loss-of-function mutation contributes to congenital conotruncal defects.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Fu-Xing Li; Xing-Yuan Liu; Jing-Yi Hou; Shi-Hong Ni; Juan Wang; Cui-Mei Zhao; Wei Zhang; Ye Kong; Ri-Tai Huang; Song Xue; Yi-Qing Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  A Novel TBX1 Loss-of-Function Mutation Associated with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Yun Pan; Zha-Gen Wang; Xing-Yuan Liu; Hong Zhao; Ning Zhou; Gui-Fen Zheng; Xing-Biao Qiu; Ruo-Gu Li; Fang Yuan; Hong-Yu Shi; Xu-Min Hou; Yi-Qing Yang
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Mutation Screening of Gata4 Gene in CTD Patients Within Chinese Han Population.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Bojian Li; Yuejuan Xu; Kun Sun
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Non-syndromic Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Silvia Pulignani; Cecilia Vecoli; Andrea Borghini; Ilenia Foffa; Lamia Ait-Alì; Maria Grazia Andreassi
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 7.  Molecular genetics of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Authors:  Bernice E Morrow; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Beverly S Emanuel; Joris R Vermeesch; Peter J Scambler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Genetic mutation analysis in Japanese patients with non-syndromic congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Akiko Yoshida; Hiroko Morisaki; Mai Nakaji; Masataka Kitano; Ki-Sung Kim; Koichi Sagawa; Shiro Ishikawa; Ichiro Satokata; Yoshihide Mitani; Hitoshi Kato; Kenji Hamaoka; Shigeyuki Echigo; Isao Shiraishi; Takayuki Morisaki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  A 3 base pair deletion in TBX1 leads to reduced protein expression and transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Yuejuan Xu; Shaohai Fang; Erge Zhang; Tian Pu; Ruixue Cao; Qihua Fu; Fen Li; Sun Chen; Kun Sun; Rang Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A loss-of-function mutation p.T52S in RIPPLY3 is a potential predisposing genetic risk factor for Chinese Han conotruncal heart defect patients without the 22q11.2 deletion/duplication.

Authors:  Nanchao Hong; Erge Zhang; Qingjie Wang; Xiaoqing Zhang; Fen Li; Qihua Fu; Rang Xu; Yu Yu; Sun Chen; Yuejuan Xu; Kun Sun
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.