Armin Soave1, Stefan Steurer2, Roland Dahlem2, Michael Rink2, Philipp Reiss2, Margit Fisch2, Oliver Engel2. 1. Departments of Urology and Pathology (SS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: a.soave@uke.de. 2. Departments of Urology and Pathology (SS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Histopathological changes in buccal mucosa transplants after engraftment to the urethra and exposure to urine remain nebulous. We investigated histopathological changes in buccal mucosa transplants integrated into the urethra in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 22 patients with recurrent urethral stricture after buccal mucosa urethroplasty between November 2012 and October 2013. All patients underwent repeat buccal mucosa urethroplasty performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperatively we harvested a sample of the integrated buccal mucosa transplant previously engrafted to the urethra, a sample of healthy urethra, a sample of freshly harvested buccal mucosa from the contralateral inner cheek and a sample of fibrotic tissue from the area of the current stricture. A dedicated uropathologist performed meticulous histopathological examination of all tissue samples using hematoxylin and eosin staining. Preoperative clinical data were also collected on all patients. RESULTS: The mean interval from previous to current buccal mucosa urethroplasty was 22.2 months (range 4.1 to 76.0). Mean stricture length at repeat urethroplasty was 52.7 mm (range 30.0 to 70.0). Histopathological characteristics of the integrated buccal mucosa transplants were completely preserved in all patients, consisting of thick sheets of stratified nonkeratinized squamous epithelium with a stratum spinosum. Transplants were not partially or entirely overgrown with urothelium. CONCLUSIONS: Buccal mucosa transplants retain their histopathological characteristics and are not overgrown with urothelium after urethral engraftment and urine exposure in humans. These findings may explain the superiority of buccal mucosa transplants on the outcome of substitution urethroplasty compared to that of other materials.
PURPOSE: Histopathological changes in buccal mucosa transplants after engraftment to the urethra and exposure to urine remain nebulous. We investigated histopathological changes in buccal mucosa transplants integrated into the urethra in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 22 patients with recurrent urethral stricture after buccal mucosa urethroplasty between November 2012 and October 2013. All patients underwent repeat buccal mucosa urethroplasty performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperatively we harvested a sample of the integrated buccal mucosa transplant previously engrafted to the urethra, a sample of healthy urethra, a sample of freshly harvested buccal mucosa from the contralateral inner cheek and a sample of fibrotic tissue from the area of the current stricture. A dedicated uropathologist performed meticulous histopathological examination of all tissue samples using hematoxylin and eosin staining. Preoperative clinical data were also collected on all patients. RESULTS: The mean interval from previous to current buccal mucosa urethroplasty was 22.2 months (range 4.1 to 76.0). Mean stricture length at repeat urethroplasty was 52.7 mm (range 30.0 to 70.0). Histopathological characteristics of the integrated buccal mucosa transplants were completely preserved in all patients, consisting of thick sheets of stratified nonkeratinized squamous epithelium with a stratum spinosum. Transplants were not partially or entirely overgrown with urothelium. CONCLUSIONS: Buccal mucosa transplants retain their histopathological characteristics and are not overgrown with urothelium after urethral engraftment and urine exposure in humans. These findings may explain the superiority of buccal mucosa transplants on the outcome of substitution urethroplasty compared to that of other materials.
Authors: Clemens M Rosenbaum; Marianne Schmid; Tim A Ludwig; Luis A Kluth; Philip Reiss; Roland Dahlem; Oliver Engel; Felix K-H Chun; Silke Riechardt; Margit Fisch; Sascha A Ahyai Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Felix Campos-Juanatey; Simon Bugeja; Mariya Dragova; Anastasia V Frost; Stella L Ivaz; Daniela E Andrich; Anthony R Mundy Journal: Asian J Androl Date: 2020 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.285
Authors: Felix Campos-Juanatey; Ainara Azueta Etxebarria; Paola Calleja Hermosa; Sara Marcos Gonzalez; Eneko Alonso Mediavilla; Miguel Angel Correas Gomez; Jose Antonio Portillo Martin; Jose Luis Gutierrrez Baños Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Shengwei Xiong; Jie Wang; Weijie Zhu; Kunlin Yang; Guangpu Ding; Xuesong Li; Daniel D Eun Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 3.411