Literature DB >> 24998337

TDCS increases cortical excitability: direct evidence from TMS-EEG.

Leonor J Romero Lauro1, Mario Rosanova2, Giulia Mattavelli3, Silvia Convento3, Alberto Pisoni3, Alexander Opitz4, Nadia Bolognini5, Giuseppe Vallar5.   

Abstract

Despite transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is increasingly used in experimental and clinical settings, its precise mechanisms of action remain largely unknown. At a neuronal level, tDCS modulates the resting membrane potential in a polarity-dependent fashion: anodal stimulation increases cortical excitability in the stimulated region, while cathodal decreases it. So far, the neurophysiological underpinnings of the immediate and delayed effects of tDCS, and to what extent the stimulation of a given cerebral region may affect the activity of anatomically connected regions, remain unclear. In the present study, we used a combination of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Electroencephalography (EEG) in order to explore local and global cortical excitability modulation during and after active and sham tDCS. Single pulse TMS was delivered over the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC), before, during, and after 15 min of tDCS over the right PPC, while EEG was recorded from 60 channels. For each session, indexes of global and local cerebral excitability were obtained, computed as global and local mean field power (Global Mean Field Power, GMFP and Local Mean Field Power, LMFP) on mean TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) for three temporal windows: 0-50, 50-100, and 100-150 msec. The global index was computed on all 60 channels. The local indexes were computed in six clusters of electrodes: left and right in frontal, parietal and temporal regions. GMFP increased, compared to baseline, both during and after active tDCS in the 0-100 msec temporal window. LMFP increased after the end of stimulation in parietal and frontal clusters bilaterally, while no difference was found in the temporal clusters. In sum, a diffuse rise of cortical excitability occurred, both during and after active tDCS. This evidence highlights the spreading of the effects of anodal tDCS over remote cortical regions of stimulated and contralateral hemispheres.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cortical excitability; Posterior parietal cortex; TMS-EEG; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24998337     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  59 in total

1.  Individual differences in TMS sensitivity influence the efficacy of tDCS in facilitating sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Labruna; A Stark-Inbar; A Breska; M Dabit; B Vanderschelden; M A Nitsche; R B Ivry
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Maturation changes the excitability and effective connectivity of the frontal lobe: A developmental TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sara Määttä; Laura Säisänen; Elisa Kallioniemi; Timo A Lakka; Niina Lintu; Eero A Haapala; Päivi Koskenkorva; Eini Niskanen; Florinda Ferreri; Mervi Könönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS.

Authors:  Sara Tremblay; Jean-François Lepage; Alex Latulipe-Loiselle; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to assessment of brain connectivity and networks.

Authors:  Mark Hallett; Riccardo Di Iorio; Paolo Maria Rossini; Jung E Park; Robert Chen; Pablo Celnik; Antonio P Strafella; Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Targeting Gamma-Related Pathophysiology in Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Fae B Kayarian; Ali Jannati; Alexander Rotenberg; Emiliano Santarnecchi
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 5.216

6.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex on attention function in healthy young adults.

Authors:  On-Yee Lo; Paul van Donkelaar; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Modulating Hippocampal Plasticity with In Vivo Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Joyce G Rohan; Kim A Carhuatanta; Shawn M McInturf; Molly K Miklasevich; Ryan Jankord
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space.

Authors:  Sangtae Ahn; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases the Benefit of At-Home Cognitive Training in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Leigh Charvet; Michael Shaw; Bryan Dobbs; Ariana Frontario; Kathleen Sherman; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Lauren Krupp; Esmail Zeinapour; Margaret Kasschau
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-02-22

Review 10.  Is there a neuroscience-based, mechanistic rationale for transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunct treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder?

Authors:  C R Faucher; R A Doherty; N S Philip; A S M Harle; J J E Cole; M Van't Wout-Frank
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.