| Literature DB >> 24998296 |
Rina Miyawaki1, Ai Shibata, Kaori Ishii, Koichiro Oka.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although considerable evidence has demonstrated that physical activity is associated with breast cancer prevention, few studies have assessed the level of awareness of this association. Awareness is a key first step to successful of behavior change. Increasing awareness may contribute to promote physical activity and prevent breast cancer at the population level. The present study examined the prevalence and correlates of awareness about the role of physical activity in breast cancer prevention among Japanese women.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24998296 PMCID: PMC4105529 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-80
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of awareness about the role of physical activity in breast cancer prevention
| 985 | 100.0 | 31.5 | |
| | | | |
| 20–29 | 197 | 20.0 | 38.1 |
| 30–39 | 197 | 20.0 | 32.5 |
| 40–49 | 198 | 20.1 | 28.3 |
| 50–59 | 195 | 19.8 | 32.8 |
| 60–69 | 198 | 20.1 | 25.8 |
| | | | |
| Unmarried | 253 | 25.7 | 30.5 |
| Married | 732 | 74.3 | 34.4 |
| | | | |
| No | 361 | 36.6 | 37.4 |
| Yes | 624 | 63.4 | 28.0 |
| | | | |
| Less than high school graduate | 303 | 30.8 | 25.7 |
| 2 years college or equivalent | 335 | 34.0 | 30.1 |
| College graduate | 347 | 35.2 | 37.8 |
| | | | |
| Not full time | 692 | 70.3 | 30.2 |
| Employment full time | 293 | 29.7 | 34.5 |
| | | | |
| <3,000,000 | 168 | 17.1 | 36.3 |
| <5,000,000 | 266 | 27.0 | 28.9 |
| <7,000,000 | 237 | 24.1 | 29.5 |
| <10,000,00 | 183 | 18.6 | 33.3 |
| ≥10,000,000 | 131 | 13.3 | 31.3 |
Multivariate logistic models for awareness of the role of physical activity in breast cancer prevention
| | | | | | |
| 20–29 | 197 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| 30–39 | 197 | 0.78 | (0.52–1.36) | 0.79 | (0.36–1.73) |
| 40–49 | 198 | 0.64 | (0.42-0.98)** | 1.15 | (0.59–2.25) |
| 50–59 | 195 | 0.80 | (0.53-1.20) | 0.62 | (0.37–1.05) |
| 60–69 | 198 | 0.56 | (0.37-087)* | 0.91 | (0.56–1.49) |
| | | | | | |
| Unmarried | 253 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| Married | 732 | 0.84 | (0.62-1.13) | 1.75 | (1.05–2.92)* |
| | | | | | |
| No | 361 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| Yes | 624 | 0.65 | (0.50-0.86)** | 0.56 | (0.36–0.86)** |
| | | | | | |
| Less than high school graduate | 303 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| 2 years college or equivalent | 335 | 1.25 | (0.88-1.76) | 1.00 | (0.68–1.49) |
| College graduate | 347 | 1.75 | (1.25-2.45)** | 1.50 | (1.01–2.22)* |
| | | | | | |
| Not full time | 692 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| Employment full time | 293 | 1.22 | (0.99-1.63) | 1.04 | (0.72–1.50) |
| | | | | | |
| <3,000,000 | 168 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| <5,000,000 | 266 | 0.72 | (0.47-1.08) | 0.65 | (0.40–1.04) |
| <7,000,000 | 237 | 0.74 | (0.48-1.12) | 0.58 | (0.40–1.08) |
| <10,000,00 | 183 | 0.88 | (0.57-1.36) | 0.79 | (0.47–1.33) |
| ≥10,000,000 | 131 | 0.80 | (0.49-1.30) | 0.66 | (0.37–1.17) |
| | | | | | |
| Pre-menopause | 642 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| Post-menopause | 343 | 0.71 | (0.53-0.95) | 0.62 | (0.34–1.11) |
| | | | | | |
| No | 935 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| Yes | 50 | 1.36 | (0.75-2.44) | 0.95 | (0.50–1.82) |
| | n | OR | (95%CI) | AOR | (95%CI) |
| | | | | | |
| No | 267 | 1 | (ref)*** | 1 | (ref) |
| Yes | 618 | 2.51 | (1.85-3.39)*** | 2.11 | (1.51–2.95)*** |
| | | | | | |
| Low | 437 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| High | 548 | 2.48 | (1.86-3.30)*** | 2.43 | (1.75–3.36)*** |
| | | | | | |
| Low | 408 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| High | 577 | 0.28 | (0.21-0.38)*** | 0.30 | (0.22–0.40)*** |
| | | | | | |
| Low | 177 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| High | 808 | 1.43 | (0.99-2.07) | 1.16 | (0.76–1.76) |
| | | | | | |
| Inactive | 565 | 1 | (ref) | 1 | (ref) |
| Some regular activity | 181 | 1.23 | (0.80-1.88) | 0.98 | (0.61–1.59) |
| Meet physical activity recommendations | 239 | 1.39 | (0.99-1.94) | 1.21 | (0.83–1.77) |
Notes. OR, odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.; ref, referent group. *p < .05; **p<.01; ***p < .001.
Note: The multivariate model examined all variables simultaneously and mutually adjusted them for each other.