Literature DB >> 24997932

Comparison of sewage sludge- and pig manure-derived biochars for hydrogen sulfide removal.

Xiaoyun Xu1, Xinde Cao2, Ling Zhao1, Tonghua Sun1.   

Abstract

Biochars derived from pig manure and sewage sludge were evaluated for their abilities to remove hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from gas phase. The pig manure biochar had higher capacities for H2S sorption than sewage sludge biochar in both dynamic and static systems, and moisture improves H2S removal. Increasing the biochar moisture to 25 wt% and 100 wt% in the static system increased the pig manure biochar removal capacities by 15.9% and 58.9%, respectively, compared to the dry biochar (0 wt% moisture). The sewage sludge biochar similarly increased the removal by 1.04 and 3.30 times for 25 wt% and 100 wt% moisture, respectively. The catalytic conversion to elemental S(0) and SO4(2)(-) was the main route of H2S removal. The complete oxidation of H2S into SO4(2)(-) mainly occurred on the biochar surface, while H2S underwent incomplete oxidation into elemental S(0) in the biochar pores. The SO4(2)(-) was the dominant form in both biochars, especially for the pig manure biochar which contained 53.9% of the total sulfur at 100 wt% moisture. The SO4(2)(-) was mainly present as CaSO4 precipitate in the sewage sludge biochar, while SO4(2)(-) in the pig manure biochar was mostly soluble (K, Na)2SO4. The results indicated the waste biomass can be converted into value-added biochar as a sorbent for H2S, especially at high moisture that promotes complete oxidation of H2S into SO4(2)(-). Strong alkalinity and rich inorganic minerals originated in the biochar play an important role in its high H2S sorption ability and the final sulfur forms.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochar; Catalytic oxidation; Hydrogen sulfide; Inorganic mineral

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24997932     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  6 in total

1.  Gas permeability of biochar-amended clay: potential alternative landfill final cover material.

Authors:  James Tsz Fung Wong; Zhongkui Chen; Charles Wang Wai Ng; Ming Hung Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Feasibility of biochar application on a landfill final cover-a review on balancing ecology and shallow slope stability.

Authors:  Xun-Wen Chen; James Tsz-Fung Wong; Charles Wang-Wai Ng; Ming-Hung Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Functionalized biochar-supported magnetic MnFe2O4 nanocomposite for the removal of Pb(ii) and Cd(ii).

Authors:  Lianke Zhang; Jinyue Guo; Xuemin Huang; Weida Wang; Peng Sun; Yumei Li; Jianhong Han
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Effect of Bimetallic-Activated Carbon Impregnation on Adsorption-Desorption Performance for Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Capture.

Authors:  Nurul Noramelya Zulkefli; Loshinni S Mathuray Veeran; Adam Mohd Izhan Noor Azam; Mohd Shahbudin Masdar; Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Co-composting of cattle manure with biochar and elemental sulphur and its effects on manure quality, plant biomass and microbiological characteristics of post-harvest soil.

Authors:  Jiri Holatko; Tereza Hammerschmiedt; Antonin Kintl; Adnan Mustafa; Muhammad Naveed; Tivadar Baltazar; Oldrich Latal; Petr Skarpa; Pavel Ryant; Martin Brtnicky
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas using activated carbon synthesized from different locally available biomass wastes - a case study from Palestine.

Authors:  Hassan Sawalha; Maher Maghalseh; Janna Qutaina; Kholoud Junaidi; Eldon R Rene
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.269

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.