Literature DB >> 24997742

Occurrence and fate of synthetic musk fragrances in a small German river.

Claudia Lange1, Bertram Kuch2, Jörg W Metzger3.   

Abstract

The polycyclic musks tonalide(®) (acetyl hexamethyltetraline=1-(3,5,5,6,8,8-hexamethyl-6,7-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)ethanone, AHTN), galaxolide(®) (1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyrane, HHCB) and the degradation product HHCB-lactone were determined in water samples and brown trouts (Salmo trutta fario) of the river Ammer, a small catchment in the state of Baden-Württemberg, south-west Germany. The Ammer receives the effluent discharge of two municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with 90,000 population equivalents. The wastewater contributes 14% of the total discharge of the river (average 1.0m(3)/s). Water samples were collected monthly at 12 sampling points from June 2010 to May 2011. Downstream the WWTPs the median concentrations of HHCB, AHTN and HHCB-lactone were 0.26 μg/L, 0.06 μg/L and 1.0 μg/L, respectively. The effluent of the WWTPs was identified as main source of the synthetic musks in the surface water. The ratio of HHCB-lactone/HHCB showed significant seasonal variations indicating the influence of the water temperature on the degradation of HHCB in the surface water. A total of 251 trout was caught in two campaigns in October 2010 at 12 sampling points. The median concentrations of HHCB and AHTN in the trouts downstream the WWTPs significantly increased to 10.8μg/g lipid weight (LW) and 3.7 μg/g LW, respectively.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioaccumulation; Fish; Musk fragrances; Surface water; Wastewater treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24997742     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of passive sampling and biota for monitoring of tonalide in aquatic environment.

Authors:  Jitka Tumova; Katerina Grabicova; Oksana Golovko; Olga Koba; Vit Kodes; Ganna Fedorova; Roman Grabic; Hana Kocour Kroupova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Environmental exposure of anthropogenic micropollutants in the Prut River at the Romanian-Moldavian border: a snapshot in the lower Danube river basin.

Authors:  Zaharie Moldovan; Olivian Marincas; Igor Povar; Tudor Lupascu; Philipp Longree; Jelena Simovic Rota; Heinz Singer; Alfredo C Alder
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Could the musk compound tonalide affect physiological functions and act as an endocrine disruptor in rainbow trout?

Authors:  N Hodkovicova; V Enevova; J Cahova; J Blahova; Z Siroka; L Plhalova; V Doubkova; P Marsalek; A Franc; E Fiorino; C Faggio; F Tichy; M Faldyna; Z Svobodova
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.881

Review 4.  Influence of Fragrances on Human Psychophysiological Activity: With Special Reference to Human Electroencephalographic Response.

Authors:  Kandhasamy Sowndhararajan; Songmun Kim
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2016-11-29

5.  A Comparative Multi-System Approach to Characterizing Bioactivity of Commonly Occurring Chemicals.

Authors:  Brianna N Rivera; Lindsay B Wilson; Doo Nam Kim; Paritosh Pande; Kim A Anderson; Susan C Tilton; Robyn L Tanguay
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Inclusion of emerging organic contaminants in groundwater monitoring plans.

Authors:  Lucrezia Lamastra; Matteo Balderacchi; Marco Trevisan
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2016-05-25

7.  Graphene-Derivatized Silica Composite as Solid-Phase Extraction Sorbent Combined with GC-MS/MS for the Determination of Polycyclic Musks in Aqueous Samples.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Jiayi Chen; Yan Chen; Jihua Wang; Hua Ping; Anxiang Lu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.