Stefan Utzolino1, Christian M Ditzel2, Peter K Baier3, Ulrich T Hopt2, Magnus F Kaffarnik4. 1. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: stefan.utzolino@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany. 3. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Germany. 4. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Charité-University of Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although obesity is usually regarded as a risk factor in surgical patients, various observations have revealed a better outcome in the obese. This finding is called the obesity paradox. To which group of patients the paradox applies and even whether it exists at all are matters of controversial discussion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 253 consecutive patients with surgical peritonitis and sepsis who needed intensive care for more than 2 days postoperative. Patients were assigned to groups according to body mass index (BMI), and groups were compared with respect to outcome parameters. RESULTS: In the 4 BMI groups--less than 21, 21 to 25, 26 to 30, and more than 30 kg/m(2)--mortality rate at 28 days was 73%, 50%, 42%, and 31%, respectively. The relative risk of death at 28 days in the BMI greater than 30 kg/m(2) group compared to the normal weight group (BMI, 21-25.9 kg/m(2)) was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.94). However, mortality rate at 5 years was 90%, 70%, 69%, and 75%, respectively. Patients in the lowest BMI range were less likely to be discharged home. Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay was longest in the group of highest BMI, and that group had the best mean survival (386 days for BMI >30 kg/m(2) vs 113 days for BMI <21 kg/m(2)). CONCLUSIONS: The "obesity paradox" may exist in patients with surgical peritonitis. Short-term but not long-term outcomes were improved in the obese. Concerns about obesity as a special risk factor in patients with peritonitis are not warranted according to our findings.
PURPOSE: Although obesity is usually regarded as a risk factor in surgical patients, various observations have revealed a better outcome in the obese. This finding is called the obesity paradox. To which group of patients the paradox applies and even whether it exists at all are matters of controversial discussion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 253 consecutive patients with surgical peritonitis and sepsis who needed intensive care for more than 2 days postoperative. Patients were assigned to groups according to body mass index (BMI), and groups were compared with respect to outcome parameters. RESULTS: In the 4 BMI groups--less than 21, 21 to 25, 26 to 30, and more than 30 kg/m(2)--mortality rate at 28 days was 73%, 50%, 42%, and 31%, respectively. The relative risk of death at 28 days in the BMI greater than 30 kg/m(2) group compared to the normal weight group (BMI, 21-25.9 kg/m(2)) was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.94). However, mortality rate at 5 years was 90%, 70%, 69%, and 75%, respectively. Patients in the lowest BMI range were less likely to be discharged home. Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay was longest in the group of highest BMI, and that group had the best mean survival (386 days for BMI >30 kg/m(2) vs 113 days for BMI <21 kg/m(2)). CONCLUSIONS: The "obesity paradox" may exist in patients with surgical peritonitis. Short-term but not long-term outcomes were improved in the obese. Concerns about obesity as a special risk factor in patients with peritonitis are not warranted according to our findings.
Authors: Jesse Roth; Navneet Sahota; Priya Patel; Syed Faizan Mehdi; Mohammad Masum Wiese; Hafiz B Mahboob; Michelle Bravo; Daniel J Eden; Muhammad A Bashir; Amrat Kumar; Farah Alsaati; Irwin J Kurland; Wunnie Brima; Ann Danoff; Alessandra L Szulc; Valentin A Pavlov; Kevin J Tracey; Huan Yang Journal: Mol Med Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Dominique J Pepper; Cumhur Y Demirkale; Junfeng Sun; Chanu Rhee; David Fram; Peter Eichacker; Michael Klompas; Anthony F Suffredini; Sameer S Kadri Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Zachary C Dietch; Therese M Duane; Charles H Cook; Patrick J O'Neill; Reza Askari; Lena M Napolitano; Nicholas Namias; Christopher M Watson; Daniel L Dent; Brandy L Edwards; Puja M Shah; Christopher A Guidry; Stephen W Davies; Rhett N Willis; Robert G Sawyer Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: Manu Shankar-Hari; Michael Ambler; Viyaasan Mahalingasivam; Andrew Jones; Kathryn Rowan; Gordon D Rubenfeld Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 9.097