| Literature DB >> 24997003 |
Rubina Sirri1, Carlo Bianco, Gionata De Vico, Francesca Carella, Alessio Bonaldo, Giuseppe Sarli, Giada Tondini, Luciana Mandrioli.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of intestinal trophism, mainly the mucosal layer, is an important issue in various conditions associated with injury, atrophy, recovery, and healing of the gut. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the kinetics of the proliferation and apoptosis of enterocytes by immunohistochemistry and to assess the complexity of intestinal mucosa by fractal dimension (FD) analysis in Solea solea fed different experimental diets.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24997003 PMCID: PMC4094408 DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Figure 1Immunohistochemistry with anti-PCNA antibody and TUNEL assay. (A) PCNA-positive nuclei of enterocytes are located mainly in the basal area and along the intestinal folds. (B) TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells (arrows) and apoptotic bodies (arrow heads) are located at the apex of intestinal folds. The intrinsic nonspecific binding is also evident (asterisks) (Bars = 25 μm).
Figure 2Diet effect on PCNA index. Pooled data of PCNA index (9 anterior + 9 intermediate + 9 posterior intestinal tracts = 27 for each group) for each diet displayed PCNA index of MM75 group significantly lower than MM50 and MM0 (Post-hoc Kruskal-Wallis Multiple Comparison n = 108; H = 13.64672, significance p < 0.05) (letters mark significant differences in pairwise comparison).
Figure 3Diet effect on intestinal fractal dimension. Pooled data of fractal dimension (respectively, MM0 = 8 anterior + 7 intermediate + 8 posterior intestinal tracts = 23; MM25 = 4 anterior + 5 intermediate + 6 posterior intestinal tracts = 15; MM 50 = 6 anterior + 8 intermediate + 7 posterior intestinal tracts = 21 and MM75 = 6 anterior + 8 intermediate + 7 posterior intestinal = 21) for each diet displayed an increase of FD with the reduction of mussel meal (MM) diet content (Anova Post hoc Fisher LSD test n = 80; mean ± 1.96*SE, significance p < 0.05) (letters mark significant differences in pairwise comparison).