Literature DB >> 24996280

Adding cows to the reference population makes a small dairy population competitive.

J R Thomasen1, A C Sørensen2, M S Lund2, B Guldbrandtsen2.   

Abstract

Small dairy breeds are challenged by low reliabilities of genomic prediction. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of including cows in the reference population for small dairy cattle populations with a limited number of sires in the reference population. Using detailed simulations, 2 types of scenarios for maintaining and updating the reference population over a period of 15yr were investigated: a turbo scheme exclusively using genotyped young bulls and a hybrid scheme with mixed use of genotyped young bulls and progeny-tested bulls. Two types of modifications were investigated: (1) number of progeny-tested bulls per year was tested at 6 levels: 15, 40, 60, 100, 250, and 500; and (2) each year, 2,000 first-lactation cows were randomly selected from the cow population for genotyping or, alternatively, an additional 2,000 first-lactation cows were randomly selected and typed in the first 2yr. The effects were evaluated in the 2 main breeding schemes. The breeding schemes were chosen to mimic options for the Danish Jersey cattle population. Evaluation criteria were annual monetary genetic gain, rate of inbreeding, reliability of genomic predictions, and variance of response. Inclusion of cows in the reference population increased monetary genetic gain and decreased the rate of inbreeding. The increase in genetic gain was larger for the turbo schemes with shorter generation intervals. The variance of response was generally higher in turbo schemes than in schemes using progeny-tested bulls. However, the risk was reduced by adding cows to the reference population. The annual genetic gain and the reliability of genomic predictions were slightly higher with more cows in the reference population. Inclusion of cows in the reference population is a rapid way to increase reliabilities of genomic predictions and hence increase genetic gain in a small population. An economic evaluation shows that genotyping of cows is a profitable investment.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genomic breeding plan; genomic selection; genotyped cow

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24996280     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-7906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.

Authors:  Bruna P Sollero; Jeremy T Howard; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Invited review: overview of new traits and phenotyping strategies in dairy cattle with a focus on functional traits.

Authors:  C Egger-Danner; J B Cole; J E Pryce; N Gengler; B Heringstad; A Bradley; K F Stock
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Using a very low-density SNP panel for genomic selection in a breeding program for sheep.

Authors:  Jérôme Raoul; Andrew A Swan; Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Theoretical Evaluation of Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction in Chinese Indigenous Cattle.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Zezhao Wang; Bo Zhu; Ying Liu; Hongwei Li; Farhad Bordbar; Yan Chen; Lupei Zhang; Xue Gao; Huijiang Gao; Shengli Zhang; Lingyang Xu; Junya Li
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Systematic genotyping of groups of cows to improve genomic estimated breeding values of selection candidates.

Authors:  Laura Plieschke; Christian Edel; Eduardo C G Pimentel; Reiner Emmerling; Jörn Bennewitz; Kay-Uwe Götz
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.297

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.