Literature DB >> 24996266

Effect of merging levels of locomotion scores for dairy cows on intra- and interrater reliability and agreement.

Andrés Schlageter-Tello1, Eddie A M Bokkers2, Peter W G Groot Koerkamp3, Tom Van Hertem4, Stefano Viazzi4, Carlos E B Romanini4, Ilan Halachmi5, Claudia Bahr4, Daniël Berckmans4, Kees Lokhorst6.   

Abstract

Locomotion scores are used for lameness detection in dairy cows. In research, locomotion scores with 5 levels are used most often. Analysis of scores, however, is done after transformation of the original 5-level scale into a 4-, 3-, or 2-level scale to improve reliability and agreement. The objective of this study was to evaluate different ways of merging levels to optimize resolution, reliability, and agreement of locomotion scores for dairy cows. Locomotion scoring was done by using a 5-level scale and 10 experienced raters in 2 different scoring sessions from videos from 58 cows. Intra- and interrater reliability and agreement were calculated as weighted kappa coefficient (κw) and percentage of agreement (PA), respectively. Overall intra- and interrater reliability and agreement and specific intra- and interrater agreement were determined for the 5-level scale and after transformation into 4-, 3-, and 2-level scales by merging different combinations of adjacent levels. Intrarater reliability (κw) ranged from 0.63 to 0.86, whereas intrarater agreement (PA) ranged from 60.3 to 82.8% for the 5-level scale. Interrater κw=0.28 to 0.84 and interrater PA=22.6 to 81.8% for the 5-level scale. The specific intrarater agreement was 76.4% for locomotion level 1, 68.5% for level 2, 65% for level 3, 77.2% for level 4, and 80% for level 5. Specific interrater agreement was 64.7% for locomotion level 1, 57.5% for level 2, 50.8% for level 3, 60% for level 4, and 45.2% for level 5. Specific intra- and interrater agreement suggested that levels 2 and 3 were more difficult to score consistently compared with other levels in the 5-level scale. The acceptance threshold for overall intra- and interrater reliability (κw and κ ≥0.6) and agreement (PA ≥75%) and specific intra- and interrater agreement (≥75% for all levels within locomotion score) was exceeded only for the 2-level scale when the 5 levels were merged as (12)(345) or (123)(45). In conclusion, when locomotion scoring is performed by experienced raters without further training together, the lowest specific intra- and interrater agreement was obtained in levels 2 and 3 of the 5-level scale. Acceptance thresholds for overall intra- and interrater reliability and agreement and specific intra- and interrater agreement were exceeded only in the 2-level scale.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cattle; lameness; observer; resolution

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24996266     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of and factors associated with swellings of the ribs in tie stall housed dairy cows in Germany.

Authors:  Greta E Abele; Yury Zablotski; Melanie Feist; K Charlotte Jensen; Annegret Stock; Amely Campe; Roswitha Merle; Andreas W Oehm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  Lameness Detection in Dairy Cows: Part 2. Use of Sensors to Automatically Register Changes in Locomotion or Behavior.

Authors:  Annelies Van Nuffel; Ingrid Zwertvaegher; Stephanie Van Weyenberg; Matti Pastell; Vivi M Thorup; Claudia Bahr; Bart Sonck; Wouter Saeys
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Lameness Detection in Dairy Cows: Part 1. How to Distinguish between Non-Lame and Lame Cows Based on Differences in Locomotion or Behavior.

Authors:  Annelies Van Nuffel; Ingrid Zwertvaegher; Liesbet Pluym; Stephanie Van Weyenberg; Vivi M Thorup; Matti Pastell; Bart Sonck; Wouter Saeys
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Benchmarking Based on Regularly Recorded Claw Health Data of Austrian Dairy Cattle for Implementation in the Cattle Data Network (RDV).

Authors:  Johann Kofler; Marlene Suntinger; Martin Mayerhofer; Kristina Linke; Lorenz Maurer; Alexandra Hund; Andrea Fiedler; Jürgen Duda; Christa Egger-Danner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Reliability of a White Striping Scoring System and Description of White Striping Prevalence in Purebred Turkey Lines.

Authors:  Ryley J Vanderhout; Emily M Leishman; Heather Hiscock; Emhimad A Abdalla; Bayode O Makanjuola; Jeff Mohr; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Shai Barbut; Benjamin J Wood; Christine F Baes; Nienke van Staaveren
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Objective assessment of lameness in cattle after foot surgery.

Authors:  Lindsay L Buisman; Maher Alsaaod; Esther Bucher; Johann Kofler; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.