Literature DB >> 24996219

At the intersection of sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and cervical cancer screening: assessing Pap test use disparities by sex of sexual partners among black, Latina, and white U.S. women.

Madina Agénor1, Nancy Krieger2, S Bryn Austin3, Sebastien Haneuse4, Barbara R Gottlieb5.   

Abstract

Understanding how various dimensions of social inequality shape the health of individuals and populations poses a key challenge for public health. Guided by ecosocial theory and intersectionality, we used data from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth, a national probability sample, to investigate how one dimension of sexual orientation, sex of sexual partners, and race/ethnicity jointly influence Pap test use among black, Latina and white U.S. women aged 21-44 years (N = 8840). We tested for an interaction between sex of sexual partners and race/ethnicity (p = 0.015) and estimated multivariable logistic regression models for each racial/ethnic group, adjusting for socio-demographic factors. The adjusted odds of Pap test use for women with only female sexual partners in the past year were significantly lower than for women with only male sexual partners in the past year among white women (odds ratio [OR] = 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12,0.52) and may be lower among black women (OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.07,1.52); no difference was apparent among Latina women (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.31,7.73). Further, the adjusted odds of Pap test use for women with no sexual partners in the past year were significantly lower than for women with only male sexual partners in the past year among white (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.22,0.41) and black (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.15,0.37) women and marginally lower among Latina women (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.38,1.03). Adding health care indicators to the models completely explained Pap test use disparities for women with only female vs. only male sexual partners among white women and for women with no vs. only male sexual partners among Latina women. Ecosocial theory and intersectionality can be used in tandem to conceptually and operationally elucidate previously unanalyzed health disparities by multiple dimensions of social inequality.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer screening; Ecosocial theory; Intersectionality; Race/ethnicity; Sexual orientation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24996219     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  30 in total

1.  Sexual Minority Women's Experiences With Sexual Identity Disclosure in Contraceptive Care.

Authors:  Madelyne Z Greene; Emma Carpenter; C Emily Hendrick; Sadia Haider; Bethany G Everett; Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  HIV/AIDS and intersectional stigmas: Examining stigma related behaviours among medical students during service delivery.

Authors:  Nelson Varas-Díaz; Eliut Rivera-Segarra; Torsten B Neilands; Yasmín Pedrogo; Paola Carminelli-Corretjer; Nelmit Tollinchi; Estefanía Torres; Yanira Soto Del Valle; Marinilda Rivera Díaz; Nerian Ortiz
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2019-07-11

3.  Race, Age, and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status in Low Birth Weight Disparities Among Adolescent Mothers: An Intersectional Inquiry.

Authors:  Sheryl L Coley; Tracy R Nichols
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2016

4.  Correlates of Human Papillomavirus Infection Among a National Sample of Sexual Minority Women.

Authors:  Andrew J Branstetter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Stress, Coping, and Context: Examining Substance Use Among LGBTQ Young Adults With Probable Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Jennifer K Felner; Jennifer P Wisdom; Tenneill Williams; Laura Katuska; Sean J Haley; Hee-Jin Jun; Heather L Corliss
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Maternal Factors and Sexual Orientation-Related Disparities in Cervical Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Brittany M Charlton; Jessica A Kahn; Vishnudas Sarda; Sabra L Katz-Wise; Donna Spiegelman; Stacey A Missmer; S Bryn Austin
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2019-01-11

Review 7.  Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research.

Authors:  Jasmine A Abrams; Ariella Tabaac; Sarah Jung; Nicole M Else-Quest
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Disparities at the intersection of marginalized groups.

Authors:  John W Jackson; David R Williams; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.328

9.  Sexual orientation identity disparities in human papillomavirus vaccination initiation and completion among young adult US women and men.

Authors:  Madina Agénor; Sarah M Peitzmeier; Allegra R Gordon; Brittany M Charlton; Sebastien Haneuse; Jennifer Potter; S Bryn Austin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Sexual Orientation and Sexual and Reproductive Health among African American Sexual Minority Women in the U.S. South.

Authors:  Madina Agénor; S Bryn Austin; Daniel Kort; Erika L Austin; Christina A Muzny
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.