Literature DB >> 24996132

Comparative evaluation of non-structural protein-antibody detecting ELISAs for foot-and-mouth disease sero-surveillance under intensive vaccination.

Gaurav Kumar Sharma1, Jajati Keshari Mohapatra1, Sonalika Mahajan1, Rakesh Matura1, Saravanan Subramaniam1, Bramhadev Pattnaik2.   

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease is a highly infectious and contagious disease of livestock animals with transboundary and economical importance. Animals in the endemic settings are regularly vaccinated in addition to intensive surveillance for control of the disease. Under intensive vaccination, detection of infected animals among the vaccinated population is essential to monitor the infection and to track down the virus movement. Sero-surveillance and retrospective disease diagnosis is performed primarily by detecting antibodies against non-structural proteins (NSPs) of FMD virus which are usually absent in the inactivated vaccine formulations. The study was conducted with an objective to compare simultaneously performance of six NSP ELISAs in detecting infected animals in the areas covered under intensive vaccination, and to assess their fit-for-purpose attribute for sero-surveillance of FMD in India. A panel of bovine serum samples consisting of samples collected from infected with FMDV, vaccinated and naive animals were constituted. In addition, samples collected at random from areas having varied FMD situation and vaccination coverage were tested simultaneously by the six NSP ELISAs to compare their performances. The four indigenous assays showed varying degrees of correlation with the two commercial kits. The study validated that, in all the groups of samples, the indigenous assays were equally sensitive and specific as the two commercial kits. Among all the six assays, PrioCheck and in-house 3ABC I-ELISAs showed maximum sensitivity for detection of infected animals, whereas 3AB3 I-ELISA and 3ABC C-ELISA showed maximum specificity. The study concluded that the in-house available assays are equally capable as the commercially available kits for differentiation of infected animals under intensive vaccination and identifies the 3AB3 I-ELISA with optimum sensitivity and specificity for the purpose of sero-surveillance in India.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assay validation; DIVA; FMD virus; NSP ELISA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24996132     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  9 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic assays developed for the control of foot-and-mouth disease in India.

Authors:  Gaurav Kumar Sharma; Sonalika Mahajan; Rakesh Matura; Saravanan Subramaniam; Rajeev Ranjan; Jitendra Biswal; Manoranjan Rout; Jajati Keshari Mohapatra; Bana Bihari Dash; Aniket Sanyal; Bramhadev Pattnaik
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2015-08-12

2.  Chemiluminescence Immunoassay for the Detection of Antibodies against the 2C and 3ABC Nonstructural Proteins Induced by Infecting Pigs with Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus.

Authors:  Zezhong Liu; Junjun Shao; Furong Zhao; Guangqing Zhou; Shandian Gao; Wei Liu; Jianliang Lv; Xiumei Li; Yangfan Li; Huiyun Chang; Yongguang Zhang
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2017-08-04

3.  Serosurveillance of foot and mouth disease in Karnataka state, India: a 3 years study.

Authors:  Raveendra Hegde; Srikanth Kowalli; K Nagaraja; N K Dharanesha; C M Seema; Tanveer Ahmed Khan; G V Nagaraj; K Srikala; K J Sudharshana; D Nagaraju; Shesha Rao; P Giridhara; S M Byregowda
Journal:  Virusdisease       Date:  2016-08-26

4.  Comparison of High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Sucrose Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation for the Quantification of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine Antigens.

Authors:  Ah-Young Kim; Sun Young Park; Sang Hyun Park; Jae Young Kim; Jong Sook Jin; Eun-Sol Kim; Jong-Hyeon Park; Young-Joon Ko
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 5.  Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus: Immunobiology, Advances in Vaccines and Vaccination Strategies Addressing Vaccine Failures-An Indian Perspective.

Authors:  Raj Kumar Singh; Gaurav Kumar Sharma; Sonalika Mahajan; Kuldeep Dhama; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Madhusudan Hosamani; B P Sreenivasa; Wanpen Chaicumpa; Vivek Kumar Gupta; Aniket Sanyal
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-16

6.  Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Evades Innate Immune Response by 3C-Targeting of MDA5.

Authors:  Hyejin Kim; Ah-Young Kim; Jieun Choi; Sun Young Park; Sang Hyun Park; Jae-Seok Kim; Sim-In Lee; Jong-Hyeon Park; Choi-Kyu Park; Young-Joon Ko
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Application of Heparin Affinity Chromatography to Produce a Differential Vaccine without Eliciting Antibodies against the Nonstructural Proteins of the Serotype O Foot-and-Mouth Disease Viruses.

Authors:  Sun Young Park; Jung-Min Lee; Ah-Young Kim; Sang Hyun Park; Jae-Seok Kim; Hyejin Kim; Jung-Won Park; Jong-Hyeon Park; Young-Joon Ko; Choi-Kyu Park
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  The Development and Validation of a Novel Nanobody-Based Competitive ELISA for the Detection of Foot and Mouth Disease 3ABC Antibodies in Cattle.

Authors:  Sigal Gelkop; Ariel Sobarzo; Polina Brangel; Cécile Vincke; Ema Romão; Shlomit Fedida-Metula; Nick Strom; Irene Ataliba; Frank Norbet Mwiine; Sylvester Ochwo; Lauro Velazquez-Salinas; Rachel A McKendry; Serge Muyldermans; Julius Julian Lutwama; Elizabeth Rieder; Victoria Yavelsky; Leslie Lobel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-10-12

9.  Inter-laboratory comparison of 2 ELISA kits used for foot-and-mouth disease virus nonstructural protein serology.

Authors:  Clare F J Browning; Antonello Di Nardo; Lissie Henry; Tim Pollard; Lynne Hendry; Aurore Romey; Anthony Relmy; Phaedra Eble; Emiliana Brocchi; Santina Grazioli; Donald P King; Anna B Ludi
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 1.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.