Literature DB >> 24995994

Phloem flow and sugar transport in Ricinus communis L. is inhibited under anoxic conditions of shoot or roots.

Andreas D Peuke1, Arthur Gessler, Susan Trumbore, Carel W Windt, Natalia Homan, Edo Gerkema, Henk VAN As.   

Abstract

Anoxic conditions should hamper the transport of sugar in the phloem, as this is an active process. The canopy is a carbohydrate source and the roots are carbohydrate sinks. By fumigating the shoot with N2 or flooding the rhizosphere, anoxic conditions in the source or sink, respectively, were induced. Volume flow, velocity, conducting area and stationary water of the phloem were assessed by non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) flowmetry. Carbohydrates and δ(13) C in leaves, roots and phloem saps were determined. Following flooding, volume flow and conducting area of the phloem declined and sugar concentrations in leaves and in phloem saps slightly increased. Oligosaccharides appeared in phloem saps and after 3 d, carbon transport was reduced to 77%. Additionally, the xylem flow declined and showed finally no daily rhythm. Anoxia of the shoot resulted within minutes in a reduction of volume flow, conductive area and sucrose in the phloem sap decreased. Sugar transport dropped to below 40% by the end of the N2 treatment. However, volume flow and phloem sap sugar tended to recover during the N2 treatment. Both anoxia treatments hampered sugar transport. The flow velocity remained about constant, although phloem sap sugar concentration changed during treatments. Apparently, stored starch was remobilized under anoxia.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ricinus; carbohydrates; flooding; isotopic signature; phloem; xylem

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24995994     DOI: 10.1111/pce.12399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  5 in total

1.  Carbohydrate saving or biomass maintenance: which is the main determinant of the plant's long-term submergence tolerance?

Authors:  Zhaojia Li; Mengmeng Zhang; Wah Soon Chow; Fangqing Chen; Zongqiang Xie; Dayong Fan
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Morphological and physiological responses of the potato stem transport tissues to dehydration stress.

Authors:  Ernest B Aliche; Alena Prusova-Bourke; Mariam Ruiz-Sanchez; Marian Oortwijn; Edo Gerkema; Henk Van As; Richard G F Visser; C Gerard van der Linden
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Flip-flop method: A new T1-weighted flow-MRI for plants studies.

Authors:  Simon Buy; Simon Le Floch; Ning Tang; Rahima Sidiboulenouar; Michel Zanca; Patrick Canadas; Eric Nativel; Maida Cardoso; Eric Alibert; Guillaume Dupont; Dominique Ambard; Christophe Maurel; Jean-Luc Verdeil; Nadia Bertin; Christophe Goze-Bac; Christophe Coillot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Beneficial and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions during flooding stress.

Authors:  Clara Martínez-Arias; Johanna Witzell; Alejandro Solla; Juan Antonio Martin; Jesús Rodríguez-Calcerrada
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 7.947

5.  Tetrabutylphosphonium Bromide Reduces Size and Polydispersity Index of Tat2:siRNA Nano-Complexes for Triticale RNAi.

Authors:  Jordan T Pepper; Priti Maheshwari; Alicja Ziemienowicz; Paul Hazendonk; Igor Kovalchuk; François Eudes
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2017-05-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.