Literature DB >> 24995962

Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients.

Tomohiro Ogawa1, Yoshio Ohda, Kazuko Nagase, Tomoaki Kono, Katsuyuki Tozawa, Toshihiko Tomita, Masaki Iimuro, Nobuyuki Hida, Tadayuki Oshima, Hirokazu Fukui, Kazutoshi Hori, Jiro Watari, Shiro Nakamura, Hiroto Miwa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), colonoscopy is an essential procedure for evaluating mucosal damage, and treatment outcomes. A new flexible ultrathin colonoscope (PCF-PQ260) has been developed to readily pass through tortuous and narrow lesions of the colon and cause minimum patient discomfort. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the comfort and performance of this new type of scope in UC patients who underwent colonoscopy for estimation of mucosal inflammation, basically without sedation.
METHODS: In a prospective, single-center setting, among 107 UC patients who were to undergo colonoscopy, 84 eligible cases were randomly assigned to the new ultrathin flexible colonoscope, PCF-PQ260 (n = 42) or to a conventional colonoscope, PCF-Q260A (n = 42). Main outcome measure was patient pain level determined by visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 = none, and 100 = extremely painful. Other outcomes were cecal intubation time, rate of complete intubation (to reach the cecum) and rate of procedural complications.
RESULTS: VAS score was significantly lower in the new-scope group as compared with the conventional-scope group: mean ± SD, median (range): 19.3 ± 16.9, 14 (0-62) vs 32.0 ± 21.6, 31.8 (0-100, P = 0.005). However, cecal intubation rate (97.6%) and time (4 min) were similar in the two groups. There was no procedure-related serious complication in either group.
CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that the flexible ultrathin colonoscope PCF-PQ260 has significantly better tolerability in UC patients compared to a conventional colonoscope.
© 2014 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2014 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonoscopy; discomfort of colonoscopy; randomized control trial; thin colonoscope; ulcerative colitis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24995962     DOI: 10.1111/den.12323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  3 in total

1.  Super-slim endoscopy, in a patient with a Crohn's ileocecal valve stricture, for assessment of mucosal healing.

Authors:  S Pontone; C Cicerone; F M Magliocca; P Vernia
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  A pilot study of a novel variable-stiffness stylet for efficient colonoscope insertion with ex-vivo colon model.

Authors:  Daisuke Kikuchi; Ryusuke Kimura; Kosuke Nomura; Masami Tanaka; Yorinari Ochiai; Toshiro Iizuka; Shu Hoteya
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2019-07-30

3.  Colonoscopy is safe and not associated with higher pain scores in patients with hypermobility spectrum disorder: results from an exploratory prospective study.

Authors:  Abraham B Beckers; Lisa Vork; Asma Fikree; Rogier de Ridder; Qasim Aziz; Ad Masclee; Daniel Keszthelyi
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.409

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.