Literature DB >> 24995713

Patient representatives' contributions to the benefit-risk assessment tasks of the European Medicines Agency scientific committees.

Rosemarie D L C Bernabe1, Ghislaine J M W van Thiel, Johannes van Delden.   

Abstract

In the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the involvement of patients has been increasingly recognized as valuable and necessary. Specifically in scientific committees, patients through patient representatives are actively involved in deliberations and decision making processes. These scientific committees are meant to ensure that licensed medicines have a positive benefit-risk ratio in favour of the patients and users. To investigate what the contributions are of patient representatives in benefit-risk assessment, we interviewed 15 scientific committee members, 10 of whom are/were EU-state regulatory representatives and five are/were patient representatives. We asked the participants questions related to the benefit-risk assessment tasks of their committees, the connection between patient representatives and the patient perspective, and the contribution of patient representatives in the various benefit-risk assessments tasks. We found that the contribution of patient representatives benefit-risk assessment may be a variable of the benefits and the risks involved in the drug such that the necessity of their contribution is strongly felt when both benefits and risks are high, when benefits are almost equal or are equal to risks and when both benefits and risks are low. In terms of the various benefit-risk tasks, patient representatives contribute to benefit-risk analysis by providing criteria that help define the benefit-risk picture. In benefit-risk evaluation, patient representatives aid in providing a specific basis for the values and weights given to specific benefits and risks and in decision making, they provide what may be a crucial patient perspective in terms of the acceptability of risks. Hence, patient representatives provide a specific expertise in these scientific committees.
© 2014 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  European Medicines Agency; benefit-risk assessment; patient participation; patient representatives; scientific committees

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24995713      PMCID: PMC4256614          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency.

Authors:  Jack W Scannell; Alex Blanckley; Helen Boldon; Brian Warrington
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research.

Authors:  Lorelei Lingard; Mathieu Albert; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-08-07

Review 3.  Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.

Authors:  A J Avery; C Anderson; C M Bond; H Fortnum; A Gifford; P C Hannaford; L Hazell; J Krska; A J Lee; D J McLernon; E Murphy; S Shakir; M C Watson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  The risk-benefit task of research ethics committees: an evaluation of current approaches and the need to incorporate decision studies methods.

Authors:  Rosemarie D L C Bernabe; Ghislaine J M W van Thiel; Jan A M Raaijmakers; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Appraising the holistic value of Lenvatinib for radio-iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: A multi-country study applying pragmatic MCDA.

Authors:  Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Liga Bennetts; Patrizia Berto; Jenifer Ehreth; Xavier Badia; Mireille Goetghebeur
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 2.  Improving Patient Preference Elicitation by Applying Concepts From the Consumer Research Field: Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Niki Ver Donck; Geert Vander Stichele; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2020-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.