| Literature DB >> 24995366 |
Wei Zhou1, Teng-Fei Lv2, Yong Chen1, Anthony P Westby3, Wan-Jun Ren1.
Abstract
Paddy-upland rotation is an unavoidable cropping system for Asia to meet the increasing demand for food. The reduction in grain yields has increased the research interest on the soil properties of rice-based cropping systems. Paddy-upland rotation fields are unique from other wetland or upland soils, because they are associated with frequent cycling between wetting and drying under anaerobic and aerobic conditions; such rotations affect the soil C and N cycles, make the chemical speciation and biological effectiveness of soil nutrient elements varied with seasons, increase the diversity of soil organisms, and make the soil physical properties more difficult to analyze. Consequently, maintaining or improving soil quality at a desirable level has become a complicated issue. Therefore, fully understanding the soil characteristics of paddy-upland rotation is necessary for the sustainable development of the system. In this paper, we offer helpful insight into the effect of rice-upland combinations on the soil chemical, physical, and biological properties, which could provide guidance for reasonable cultivation management measures and contribute to the improvement of soil quality and crop yield.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24995366 PMCID: PMC4060577 DOI: 10.1155/2014/856352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Variation in soil bulk density of paddy-upland rotations. Data are from [2, 13, 14, 19–24].
Figure 2Characteristics of paddy-upland rotation and its improvement measures. SOM: soil organic matter.
Changes in soil fertilizer before and after experiment under different land utilizing types.
| Reference | Crop rotation | Before experiment | After experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil depth (cm) | SOC | Total N | Total P | Available P | Soil depth (cm) | SOC | Total N | Total P | Available P | ||
| [ | Rice—fallow | 0–20 | 13.4 | 1.74 | 0.75 | 7.5 | 0–10 | 19.94 | 2.10 | 1.07 | 9.40 |
| 10–20 | 20.47 | 2.14 | 0.65 | 11.10 | |||||||
| Rice—wheat | 0–10 | 18.60 | 1.82 | 0.59 | 20.70 | ||||||
| 10–20 | 17.60 | 1.78 | 0.89 | 19.50 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| [ | Rice—fallow | 15.6 | 2.53 | 0.62 | / | 0–10 | 12.53 | 2.46 | 0.53 | / | |
| 10–20 | 12.88 | 2.36 | 0.47 | ||||||||
| Rice—rye grass | 0–20 | 14.8 | 2.50 | 0.63 | / | 0–10 | 12.35 | 2.67 | 0.67 | ||
| 10–20 | 10.79 | 2.48 | 0.54 | ||||||||
| Rice—Chinese milk vetch | 16.9 | 2.46 | 0.66 | / | 0–10 | 14.97 | 2.92 | 0.59 | |||
| 10–20 | 12.41 | 2.61 | 0.49 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| [ | Rice—wheat | 0–15 | / | 1.35 | / | 8.5 | 0–15 | / | 1.40 | / | 11.40 |
| [ | 3.6 | / | / | 10.0 | 0–15 | 4.10 | / | / | 6.40 | ||
| [ | 3.2 | / | / | 11.8 | 0–15 | 2.90 | / | / | 16.10 | ||
| [ | 5.3 | / | / | / | 0–15 | 3.75 | / | / | / | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| [ | Rice—wheat | 0–20 | 12.3 | 1.70 | / | 5.2 | 0–5 | 17.0 | 1.80 | / | 8.25 |
| 5–12 | 16.30 | 1.56 | 6.83 | ||||||||
| 12–24 | 11.0 | 1.05 | 1.44 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| [ | Fallow | 0–15 | 11.4 | 1.28 | / | / | 0–5 | 32.31 | 2.89 | / | / |
| 5–15 | 16.42 | 1.61 | |||||||||
| Rice—wheat | 0–5 | 16.36 | 1.74 | ||||||||
| 5–15 | 9.92 | 1.17 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| [ | Wheat—maize | 0–20 | 5.4 | 0.41 | / | 8.3 | 0–20 | 6.50 | 0.66 | / | 22.10 |
| 6.70 | 0.71 | 25.20 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| [ | Soybean—maize | 0–15 | 5.4 | 0.45 | / | / | 0–15 | 6.80 | 1.25 | / | / |
| Centro—maize | 6.43 | 0.67 | |||||||||
| Cowpea—maize | 4.86 | 0.47 | |||||||||
| Fallow—maize | 5.07 | 0.53 | |||||||||
The data in the table are obtained from field experiments using traditional tillage method and cultivation techniques without any application of organic fertilizers or crop straws. A part of SOC data is derived from the conversion of SOM (SOM = 1.724 ∗ SOC, SOC: soil organic carbon; SOM: soil organic matter).