Literature DB >> 24994921

Addressing distress in patients with head and neck cancers: a mental health quality improvement project.

Natalie Riblet1, Karen Skalla1, Auden McClure1, Karen Homa2, Alison Luciano1, Thomas H Davis1.   

Abstract

This study sought to improve mental health care for patients with head and neck cancers (HNCs) through the implementation of an evidence-based process for identifying and managing psychological distress. This process in an HNC medical oncology clinic was assessed and redesigned using quality improvement (QI) methods from November 2010 through April 2012. The redesign, starting in January 2011, involved a 2-component QI intervention: the validated NCCN Distress Thermometer and an evidence-based treatment decision algorithm. Screening processes were improved through Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Before January 2011, distress identification was based on a provider's clinical assessment. Cause-effect diagramming suggested that lack of a formalized process for distress assessment contributed to missed diagnoses. Providers were also unfamiliar with mental health resources. After implementing process changes, biweekly distress screening rates rose from 0% to 38% between January and July 2011. Furthermore, with additional PDSA cycles, these rates increased to 74% between October 2011 and April 2012. Similar to proposed benchmarks, 84% (n=47) of newly diagnosed patients (n=56) were screened. Improvement in screening was attributed to process changes and involvement of senior leadership. QI principles can be applied to the cancer setting in order to create systems of care which more reliably identify and address the needs of patients with psychological distress.
Copyright © 2014 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24994921     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  7 in total

1.  Implementing evidence-based psychological treatments for cancer patients.

Authors:  Kristen C Williams; Brittany M Brothers; Marlena M Ryba; Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing the commission on cancer's distress screening program standard.

Authors:  Andrea K Knies; Devika R Jutagir; Elizabeth Ercolano; Nicholas Pasacreta; Mark Lazenby; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2018-06-08

3.  Hope and depression in Brazilian head and neck cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mercedes Nohely Rodriguez Torrealba; Nen Nalú Alves das Mercês; Jorge Vinícius Cestari Felix; Marcio Roberto Paes; Deny Kelson Vasques Pereira; Silvia Francine Sartor
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 4.  Psychosocial Issues in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: an Updated Review with a Focus on Clinical Interventions.

Authors:  Joshua D Smith; Andrew G Shuman; Michelle B Riba
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  Head and neck survivorship care in the times of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Authors:  Victoria W Huang; Sarah A Imam; Shaun A Nguyen
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Using a Quality Improvement Model to Implement Distress Screening in a Community Cancer Setting.

Authors:  Nancy Jo Bush; Joy R Goebel; Kholoud Hardan-Khalil; Kayo Matsumoto
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2020-11-01

7.  The prevalence of psychological disorders among cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lemeng Zhang; Xiaohong Liu; Fei Tong; Ran Zhou; Wanglian Peng; Hui Yang; Feng Liu; Desong Yang; Xufen Huang; Minni Wen; Ling Jiang; Lili Yi
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.955

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.