Literature DB >> 24993800

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: recent advances in urology.

Riccardo Autorino1, Homayoun Zargar1, Jihad H Kaouk2.   

Abstract

The aim of the present review is to summarize recent developments in the field of urologic robotic surgery. A nonsystematic literature review was performed to retrieve publications related to robotic surgery in urology and evidence-based critical analysis was conducted by focusing on the literature of the past 5 years. The use of the da Vinci Surgical System, a robotic surgical system, has been implemented for the entire spectrum of extirpative and reconstructive laparoscopic kidney procedures. The robotic approach can be applied for a range of adrenal indications as well as for ureteral diseases, including benign and malignant conditions affecting the proximal, mid, and distal ureter. Current evidence suggests that robotic prostatectomy is associated with less blood loss compared with the open surgery. Besides prostate cancer, robotics has been used for simple prostatectomy in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Recent studies suggest that minimally invasive radical cystectomy provides encouraging oncologic outcomes mirroring those reported for open surgery. In recent years, the evolution of robotic surgery has enabled urologic surgeons to perform urinary diversions intracorporeally. Robotic vasectomy reversal and several other robotic andrological applications are being explored. In summary, robotic-assisted surgery is an emerging and safe technology for most urologic operations. The acceptance of robotic prostatectomy during the past decade has paved the way for urologists to explore the entire spectrum of extirpative and reconstructive urologic procedures. Cost remains a significant issue that could be solved by wider dissemination of the technology.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Andrology; indications; robot-assisted laparoscopy; robotic surgery; urology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993800     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

1.  Face, content, construct, and concurrent validity of a novel robotic surgery patient-side simulator: the Xperience™ Team Trainer.

Authors:  Song Xu; Manuela Perez; Cyril Perrenot; Nicolas Hubert; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of novel techniques on minimally invasive adrenal surgery: trends and outcomes from a contemporary international large series in urology.

Authors:  Nicola Pavan; Riccardo Autorino; Hak Lee; Francesco Porpiglia; Yinghao Sun; Francesco Greco; S Jeff Chueh; Deok Hyun Han; Luca Cindolo; Matteo Ferro; Xiang Chen; Anibal Branco; Paolo Fornara; Chun-Hou Liao; Akira Miyajima; Iason Kyriazis; Marco Puglisi; Cristian Fiori; Bo Yang; Guo Fei; Vincenzo Altieri; Byong Chang Jeong; Francesco Berardinelli; Luigi Schips; Ottavio De Cobelli; Zhi Chen; Georges-Pascal Haber; Yao He; Mototsugu Oya; Evangelos Liatsikos; Luis Brandao; Benjamin Challacombe; Jihad Kaouk; Ithaar Darweesh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Robotic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yafan Yang; Guiying Wang; Jingli He; Fengpeng Wu; Shuguang Ren
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Robotic surgery in urology: the way forward.

Authors:  Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Robotics in urology.

Authors:  Luke A McGuinness; Bhavan Prasad Rai
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.

Authors:  Roberto Montalti; Vincenzo Scuderi; Alberto Patriti; Marco Vivarelli; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Pathophysiology and management of urinary tract endometriosis.

Authors:  Camran Nezhat; Rebecca Falik; Sara McKinney; Louise P King
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Basem G Soliman; Duc T Nguyen; Edward Y Chan; Ray K Chihara; Leonora M Meisenbach; Edward A Graviss; Min P Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotic-assisted surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: the current evidence.

Authors:  Guixiang Liao; Yan-Bing Li; Zhihong Zhao; Xianming Li; Haijun Deng; Gang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Robotic stone surgery - Current state and future prospects: A systematic review.

Authors:  Philippe F Müller; Daniel Schlager; Simon Hein; Christian Bach; Arkadiusz Miernik; Dominik S Schoeb
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.