Literature DB >> 24993512

Gaseous mercury fluxes from forest soils in response to forest harvesting intensity: a field manipulation experiment.

M Mazur1, C P J Mitchell2, C S Eckley3, S L Eggert4, R K Kolka4, S D Sebestyen4, E B Swain5.   

Abstract

Forest harvesting leads to changes in soil moisture, temperature and incident solar radiation, all strong environmental drivers of soil-air mercury (Hg) fluxes. Whether different forest harvesting practices significantly alter Hg fluxes from forest soils is unknown. We conducted a field-scale experiment in a northern Minnesota deciduous forest wherein gaseous Hg emissions from the forest floor were monitored after two forest harvesting prescriptions, a traditional clear-cut and a clearcut followed by biomass harvest, and compared to an un-harvested reference plot. Gaseous Hg emissions were measured in quadruplicate at four different times between March and November 2012 using Teflon dynamic flux chambers. We also applied enriched Hg isotope tracers and separately monitored their emission in triplicate at the same times as ambient measurements. Clearcut followed by biomass harvesting increased ambient Hg emissions the most. While significant intra-site spatial variability was observed, Hg emissions from the biomass harvested plot (180 ± 170 ng m(-2)d(-1)) were significantly greater than both the traditional clearcut plot (-40 ± 60 ng m(-2)d(-1)) and the un-harvested reference plot (-180 ± 115 ng m(-2)d(-1)) during July. This difference was likely a result of enhanced Hg(2+) photoreduction due to canopy removal and less shading from downed woody debris in the biomass harvested plot. Gaseous Hg emissions from more recently deposited Hg, as presumably representative of isotope tracer measurements, were not significantly influenced by harvesting. Most of the Hg tracer applied to the forest floor became sequestered within the ground vegetation and debris, leaf litter, and soil. We observed a dramatic lessening of tracer Hg emissions to near detection levels within 6 months. As post-clearcutting residues are increasingly used as a fuel or fiber resource, our observations suggest that gaseous Hg emissions from forest soils will increase, although it is not yet clear for how long such an effect will persist.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomass harvesting; Clearcut; Forest; Gaseous mercury emissions; Mercury isotope; Solar radiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993512     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Exchange pattern of gaseous elemental mercury in landfill: mercury deposition under vegetation coverage and interactive effects of multiple meteorological conditions.

Authors:  Zhengkai Tao; Yang Liu; Meng Zhou; Xiaoli Chai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Stream Mercury Export in Response to Contemporary Timber Harvesting Methods (Pacific Coastal Mountains, Oregon, USA).

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Collin Eagles-Smith; Michael T Tate; Brandon Kowalski; Robert Danehy; Sherri L Johnson; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Soil surface Hg emission flux in coalfield in Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China.

Authors:  Chunhui Li; Handong Liang; Ming Liang; Yang Chen; Yi Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Surface-air mercury fluxes and a watershed mass balance in forested and harvested catchments.

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Collin Eagles-Smith; Michael T Tate; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 9.988

5.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.