Maria Sarigianni1, Aris Liakos2, Efthymia Vlachaki3, Paschalis Paschos2, Eleni Athanasiadou2, Victor M Montori4, Mohammad Hassan Murad4, Apostolos Tsapas5. 1. Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. 3. Thalassemia Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. 4. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: atsapas@auth.gr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines advocate use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to estimate concentrations of iron in liver, to identify patients with iron overload, and to guide titration of chelation therapy. However, this recommendation was not based on a systematic synthesis and analysis of the evidence for MRI's diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in identifying liver iron overload in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis, hemoglobinopathy, or myelodysplastic syndrome; liver biopsy analysis was used as the reference standard. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, the Cochrane Library, and gray literature, and computed summary receiver operating curves by fitting hierarchical models. We assessed methodologic quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. RESULTS: Our final analysis included 20 studies (819 patients, total). Sensitivity and specificity values varied greatly, ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 and from 0.50 to 1.00, respectively. Because of substantial heterogeneity and variable positivity thresholds, we calculated only summary receiver operating curves (and summary estimate points for studies that used the same MRI sequences). T2 spin echo and T2* gradient-recalled echo MRI sequences accurately identified patients without liver iron overload (liver iron concentration > 7 mg Fe/g dry liver weight) (negative likelihood ratios, 0.10 and 0.05 respectively). However, these MRI sequences are less accurate in establishing a definite diagnosis of liver iron overload (positive likelihood ratio, 8.85 and 4.86, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a meta-analysis, measurements of liver iron concentration by MRI may be accurate enough to rule out iron overload, but not to definitely identify patients with this condition. Most studies did not use explicit and prespecified MRI thresholds for iron overload, therefore some patients may have been diagnosed inaccurately with this condition. More studies are needed of standardized MRI protocols and to determine the effects of MRI surveillance on the development of chronic liver disease and patient survival.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines advocate use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to estimate concentrations of iron in liver, to identify patients with iron overload, and to guide titration of chelation therapy. However, this recommendation was not based on a systematic synthesis and analysis of the evidence for MRI's diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in identifying liver iron overload in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis, hemoglobinopathy, or myelodysplastic syndrome; liver biopsy analysis was used as the reference standard. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, the Cochrane Library, and gray literature, and computed summary receiver operating curves by fitting hierarchical models. We assessed methodologic quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. RESULTS: Our final analysis included 20 studies (819 patients, total). Sensitivity and specificity values varied greatly, ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 and from 0.50 to 1.00, respectively. Because of substantial heterogeneity and variable positivity thresholds, we calculated only summary receiver operating curves (and summary estimate points for studies that used the same MRI sequences). T2 spin echo and T2* gradient-recalled echo MRI sequences accurately identified patients without liver iron overload (liver iron concentration > 7 mg Fe/g dry liver weight) (negative likelihood ratios, 0.10 and 0.05 respectively). However, these MRI sequences are less accurate in establishing a definite diagnosis of liver iron overload (positive likelihood ratio, 8.85 and 4.86, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a meta-analysis, measurements of liver iron concentration by MRI may be accurate enough to rule out iron overload, but not to definitely identify patients with this condition. Most studies did not use explicit and prespecified MRI thresholds for iron overload, therefore some patients may have been diagnosed inaccurately with this condition. More studies are needed of standardized MRI protocols and to determine the effects of MRI surveillance on the development of chronic liver disease and patient survival.
Authors: Anya Topiwala; Chaoyue Wang; Klaus P Ebmeier; Stephen Burgess; Steven Bell; Daniel F Levey; Hang Zhou; Celeste McCracken; Adriana Roca-Fernández; Steffen E Petersen; Betty Raman; Masud Husain; Joel Gelernter; Karla L Miller; Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 11.613
Authors: Hassan M Ghoz; Paul T Kröner; Fernando F Stancampiano; Andrew W Bowman; Prakash Vishnu; Michael G Heckman; Nancy N Diehl; Ethan McLeod; Naveed Nikpour; William C Palmer Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2019-06
Authors: Natasha McDonald; Peter J Eddowes; James Hodson; Scott I K Semple; Nigel P Davies; Catherine J Kelly; Stella Kin; Miranda Phillips; Amy H Herlihy; Timothy J Kendall; Rachel M Brown; Desley A H Neil; Stefan G Hübscher; Gideon M Hirschfield; Jonathan A Fallowfield Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yi Zhou; Jin-Li Meng; Li Feng; Yong-Hong Huang; Jin Ye; Man Li; Zhong-You Xu; Xiang-Wei Li; Fang Yuan; Bin Song Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 1.671