Literature DB >> 24993331

Recurrences after intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma more likely to originate from regions with high baseline [18F]-FDG uptake.

Anne K Due1, Ivan R Vogelius2, Marianne C Aznar3, Søren M Bentzen4, Anne K Berthelsen5, Stine S Korreman6, Annika Loft7, Claus A Kristensen1, Lena Specht1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To analyze the recurrence pattern in relation to target volumes and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated with definitive chemoradiation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 520 patients received radiotherapy for HNSCC from 2005 to 2009. Among 100 patients achieving complete clinical response and a later recurrence, 39 patients with 48 loco-regional failures had a recurrence CT scan before any salvage therapy. The estimated point of origin of each recurrence was transferred to the planning CT by deformable image co-registration. The recurrence position was then related to the delineated target volumes and iso-SUV-contours relative to the maximum standard uptake value (SUV). We defined the recurrence density as the total number of recurrences in a sub-volume divided by the sum of that volume for all patients.
RESULTS: 54% (95% CI 37-69%) of recurrences originated inside the FDG-positive volume and 96% (95% CI 86-99%) in the high dose region. Recurrence density was significantly higher in the central target volumes (P<0.0001) and increased with increasing FDG avidity (P=0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: The detailed pattern-of-failure data analysis suggests that most recurrences occur in the FDG PET positive areas or the solid tumor.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG-PET; Head and neck cancer; Pattern of failure; Radiotherapy; Recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993331      PMCID: PMC4469149          DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  17 in total

1.  Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers.

Authors:  Søren M Bentzen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the standard management of head and neck cancer: promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  William M Mendenhall; Robert J Amdur; Jatinder R Palta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Optimization of tumour control probability in hypoxic tumours by radiation dose redistribution: a modelling study.

Authors:  Aste Søvik; Eirik Malinen; Øyvind S Bruland; Søren M Bentzen; Dag Rune Olsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Positron emission tomography-guided, focal-dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Indira Madani; Wim Duthoy; Cristina Derie; Werner De Gersem; Tom Boterberg; Micky Saerens; Filip Jacobs; Vincent Grégoire; Max Lonneux; Luc Vakaet; Barbara Vanderstraeten; Wouter Bauters; Katrien Bonte; Hubert Thierens; Wilfried De Neve
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Increasing toxicity in nonoperative head and neck cancer treatment: investigations and interventions.

Authors:  Søren M Bentzen; David I Rosenthal; Ernest A Weymuller; Andy Trotti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Toxicity in head and neck cancer: a review of trends and issues.

Authors:  A Trotti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Optimal dose distribution for eradication of heterogeneous tumours.

Authors:  A Brahme; A K Agren
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Failure-probability driven dose painting.

Authors:  Ivan R Vogelius; Katrin Håkansson; Anne K Due; Marianne C Aznar; Anne K Berthelsen; Claus A Kristensen; Jacob Rasmussen; Lena Specht; Søren M Bentzen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Correlation between pretreatment FDG-PET biological target volume and anatomical location of failure after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Daniel E Soto; Marc L Kessler; Morand Piert; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 10.  Biologically optimized 3-dimensional in vivo predictive assay-based radiation therapy using positron emission tomography-computerized tomography imaging.

Authors:  Anders Brahme
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.089

View more
  23 in total

1.  Patterns-of-failure guided biological target volume definition for head and neck cancer patients: FDG-PET and dosimetric analysis of dose escalation candidate subregions.

Authors:  Abdallah S R Mohamed; Carlos E Cardenas; Adam S Garden; Musaddiq J Awan; Crosby D Rock; Sarah A Westergaard; G Brandon Gunn; Abdelaziz M Belal; Ahmed G El-Gowily; Stephen Y Lai; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller; Michalis Aristophanous
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 2.  PET imaging biomarkers in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Differding; François-Xavier Hanin; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  In vivo quantification of hypoxic and metabolic status of NSCLC tumors using [18F]HX4 and [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Catharina M L Zegers; Wouter van Elmpt; Bart Reymen; Aniek J G Even; Esther G C Troost; Michel C Ollers; Frank J P Hoebers; Ruud M A Houben; Jonas Eriksson; Albert D Windhorst; Felix M Mottaghy; Dirk De Ruysscher; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Adaptive Boost Target Definition in High-Risk Head and Neck Cancer Based on Multi-imaging Risk Biomarkers.

Authors:  Feifei Teng; Madhava Aryal; Jae Lee; Choonik Lee; Xioajin Shen; Peter G Hawkins; Michelle Mierzwa; Avraham Eisbruch; Yue Cao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  The promise of multiparametric imaging in oncology: how do we move forward?

Authors:  Aniek J G Even; Dirk De Ruysscher; Wouter van Elmpt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART): Conceptual Considerations for the Informed Clinician.

Authors:  Jolien Heukelom; Clifton David Fuller
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.934

7.  Co-registration of radiotherapy planning and recurrence scans with different imaging modalities in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Morten Horsholt Kristensen; Christian Rønn Hansen; Ruta Zukauskaite; Jørgen Johansen; Eva Samsøe; Christian Maare; Anne Ivalu Sander Holm; Jesper Grau Eriksen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30

8.  Targeting Treatment Resistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Proof of Concept for CT Radiomics-Based Identification of Resistant Sub-Volumes.

Authors:  Marta Bogowicz; Matea Pavic; Oliver Riesterer; Tobias Finazzi; Helena Garcia Schüler; Edna Holz-Sapra; Leonie Rudofsky; Lucas Basler; Manon Spaniol; Andreas Ambrusch; Martin Hüllner; Matthias Guckenberger; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Interobserver variability in organ at risk delineation in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  J van der Veen; A Gulyban; S Willems; F Maes; S Nuyts
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  F-18 FDG PET-CT for response evaluation in head and neck malignancy: Experience from a tertiary level hospital in south India.

Authors:  Justin Benjamin; Julie Hephzibah; Nylla Shanthly; Regi Oommen; David Mathew; Simon Pavamani; Janakiraman Rajnikanth
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.