Literature DB >> 24993272

Alternatives to fluoride in the prevention and treatment of dental erosion.

Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf1, Ana Carolina Magalhães, Annette Wiegand.   

Abstract

In recent years, different agents have been discussed as potential alternatives to fluoride in the prevention of dental erosion. These agents are intended to form acid-resistant layers on the surface, to induce repair of eroded lesions by mineral precipitation or to prevent the enzymatic degradation of demineralised collagen. The application of adhesives and/or fissure sealants is considered to be an effective alternative to fluoride, but requires professional application and, depending on the product used, a re-sealing of the surface every several months. Studies testing film-forming products, such as polymers, have suggested the potential effectiveness of some of these approaches, such as chitosan, although further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this approach. Other studies have demonstrated that products designed to deliver calcium and/or phosphate have not been successful at providing a significant anti-erosive effect. In advanced erosive lesions, the demineralised collagenous dentine matrix can be degraded by host enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). As well as fluorides, epigallocatechin gallate and chlorhexidine have been identified as effective MMP inhibitors, with the potential to reduce the progression of dentine erosion. While fluoride compounds have been shown to have an anti-erosive potential, particularly those containing tin, alternative approaches that provide even greater protective capacity still need to be developed and proven to be effective.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993272     DOI: 10.1159/000360557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Monogr Oral Sci        ISSN: 0077-0892


  13 in total

Review 1.  The use of fluoride for the prevention of dental erosion and erosive tooth wear in children and adolescents.

Authors:  A Lussi; M A R Buzalaf; D Duangthip; V Anttonen; C Ganss; S H João-Souza; T Baumann; T S Carvalho
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-02-14

2.  In situ effect of enamel salivary exposure time and type of intraoral appliance before an erosive challenge.

Authors:  Fernanda Lyrio Mendonça; Maisa Camillo Jordão; Franciny Querobim Ionta; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf; Heitor Marques Honório; Linda Wang; Daniela Rios
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Prevention of erosive tooth wear: targeting nutritional and patient-related risks factors.

Authors:  M A R Buzalaf; A C Magalhães; D Rios
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Dentifrices or gels containing MMP inhibitors prevent dentine loss: in situ studies.

Authors:  Melissa Thiemi Kato; Angelica Reis Hannas; Cristiane de Almeida Baldini Cardoso; Luiza de Paula Silva Cassiano; Paula Andery Naves; Ana Carolina Magalhães; Leo Tjäderhane; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge.

Authors:  Maísa Camillo Jordão; Gustavo Manzano Forti; Ricardo Scarparo Navarro; Patrícia Moreira Freitas; Heitor Marques Honório; Daniela Rios
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Influence of Calcium Phosphate and Apatite Containing Products on Enamel Erosion.

Authors:  A Kensche; S Pötschke; C Hannig; G Richter; W Hoth-Hannig; M Hannig
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2016-06-26

7.  Susceptibility of bovine dental enamel with initial erosion lesion to new erosive challenges.

Authors:  Gabriela Cristina de Oliveira; Guida Paola Genovez Tereza; Ana Paula Boteon; Brunna Mota Ferrairo; Priscilla Santana Pinto Gonçalves; Thiago Cruvinel da Silva; Heitor Marques Honório; Daniela Rios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Erosion protection benefits of stabilized SnF2 dentifrice versus an arginine-sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice: results from in vitro and in situ clinical studies.

Authors:  N X West; T He; E L Macdonald; J Seong; N Hellin; M L Barker; S L Eversole
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge.

Authors:  Natália Mello Santos; Maísa Camillo Jordão; Franciny Querobim Ionta; Fernanda Lyrio Mendonça; Camilla Cristina Lira Di Leone; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf; Thais Marchini Oliveira; Heitor Marques Honório; Thiago Cruvinel; Daniela Rios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  In situ effect of CPP-ACP chewing gum upon erosive enamel loss.

Authors:  Catarina Ribeiro Barros de Alencar; Gabriela Cristina de Oliveira; Ana Carolina Magalhães; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf; Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado; Heitor Marques Honório; Daniela Rios
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.