Literature DB >> 24993045

Comparison of arterial pressure and plasma ANG II responses to three methods of subcutaneous ANG II administration.

Marcos T Kuroki1, Gregory D Fink2, John W Osborn3.   

Abstract

Angiotensin II (ANG II)-induced hypertension is a commonly studied model of experimental hypertension, particularly in rodents, and is often generated by subcutaneous delivery of ANG II using Alzet osmotic minipumps chronically implanted under the skin. We have observed that, in a subset of animals subjected to this protocol, mean arterial pressure (MAP) begins to decline gradually starting the second week of ANG II infusion, resulting in a blunting of the slow pressor response and reduced final MAP. We hypothesized that this variability in the slow pressor response to ANG II was mainly due to factors unique to Alzet pumps. To test this, we compared the pressure profile and changes in plasma ANG II levels during subcutaneous ANG II administration (150 ng·kg(-1)·min(-1)) using either Alzet minipumps, iPrecio implantable pumps, or a Harvard external infusion pump. At the end of 14 days of ANG II, MAP was highest in the iPrecio group (156 ± 3 mmHg) followed by Harvard (140 ± 3 mmHg) and Alzet (122 ± 3 mmHg) groups. The rate of the slow pressor response, measured as daily increases in pressure averaged over days 2-14 of ANG II, was similar between iPrecio and Harvard groups (2.7 ± 0.4 and 2.2 ± 0.4 mmHg/day) but was significantly blunted in the Alzet group (0.4 ± 0.4 mmHg/day) due to a gradual decline in MAP in a subset of rats. We also found differences in the temporal profile of plasma ANG II between infusion groups. We conclude that the gradual decline in MAP observed in a subset of rats during ANG II infusion using Alzet pumps is mainly due to pump-dependent factors when applied in this particular context.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzet minipump; angiotensin II-salt hypertension; iPrecio pump; plasma angiotensin II; salt-sensitive hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993045      PMCID: PMC4187401          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00922.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  30 in total

1.  Different vascular responses to subpressor angiotensin II administration in the mesenteric and renal circulation of rats.

Authors:  G Cserep; G Abraham; J P Tolins; G Simon
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Do intravenous and subcutaneous angiotensin II increase blood pressure by different mechanisms?

Authors:  Duncan J Campbell
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.557

3.  Premature excess release from the Alzet osmotic pump.

Authors:  S Z Kerenyi; S L Hartgraves
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Role of the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis for the chronic cardiovascular effects produced by endogenous and exogenous ANG II in conscious rats.

Authors:  Alexandre A Vieira; David B Nahey; John P Collister
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  The role of the subfornical organ in angiotensin II-salt hypertension in the rat.

Authors:  John W Osborn; Michael D Hendel; John P Collister; Pilar A Ariza-Guzman; Gregory D Fink
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.969

6.  Baroreflexes prevent neurally induced sodium retention in angiotensin hypertension.

Authors:  T E Lohmeier; J R Lohmeier; A Haque; D A Hildebrandt
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Receptor-mediated intrarenal angiotensin II augmentation in angiotensin II-infused rats.

Authors:  L X Zou; J D Imig; A M von Thun; A Hymel; H Ono; L G Navar
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Splanchnic circulation is a critical neural target in angiotensin II salt hypertension in rats.

Authors:  Andrew J King; John W Osborn; Gregory D Fink
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Chronic angiotensin II infusion causes differential responses in regional sympathetic nerve activity in rats.

Authors:  Misa Yoshimoto; Kenju Miki; Gregory D Fink; Andrew King; John W Osborn
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  The neurogenic phase of angiotensin II-salt hypertension is prevented by chronic intracerebroventricular administration of benzamil.

Authors:  John W Osborn; Dalay M Olson; Pilar Guzman; Glenn M Toney; Gregory D Fink
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-02-26
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines on models of diabetic heart disease.

Authors:  Lisa C Heather; Anne D Hafstad; Ganesh V Halade; Romain Harmancey; Kimberley M Mellor; Paras K Mishra; Erin E Mulvihill; Miranda Nabben; Michinari Nakamura; Oliver J Rider; Matthieu Ruiz; Adam R Wende; John R Ussher
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.125

2.  Dietary Fructose Enhances the Ability of Low Concentrations of Angiotensin II to Stimulate Proximal Tubule Na⁺ Reabsorption.

Authors:  Agustin Gonzalez-Vicente; Pablo D Cabral; Nancy J Hong; Jessica Asirwatham; Nianxin Yang; Jessica M Berthiaume; Fernando P Dominici; Jeffrey L Garvin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  In vivo organ specific drug delivery with implantable peristaltic pumps.

Authors:  Joshua S Speed; Kelly A Hyndman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.