Literature DB >> 24993019

How saliency, faces, and sound influence gaze in dynamic social scenes.

Antoine Coutrot1, Nathalie Guyader1.   

Abstract

Conversation scenes are a typical example in which classical models of visual attention dramatically fail to predict eye positions. Indeed, these models rarely consider faces as particular gaze attractors and never take into account the important auditory information that always accompanies dynamic social scenes. We recorded the eye movements of participants viewing dynamic conversations taking place in various contexts. Conversations were seen either with their original soundtracks or with unrelated soundtracks (unrelated speech and abrupt or continuous natural sounds). First, we analyze how auditory conditions influence the eye movement parameters of participants. Then, we model the probability distribution of eye positions across each video frame with a statistical method (Expectation-Maximization), allowing the relative contribution of different visual features such as static low-level visual saliency (based on luminance contrast), dynamic low level visual saliency (based on motion amplitude), faces, and center bias to be quantified. Through experimental and modeling results, we show that regardless of the auditory condition, participants look more at faces, and especially at talking faces. Hearing the original soundtrack makes participants follow the speech turn-taking more closely. However, we do not find any difference between the different types of unrelated soundtracks. These eyetracking results are confirmed by our model that shows that faces, and particularly talking faces, are the features that best explain the gazes recorded, especially in the original soundtrack condition. Low-level saliency is not a relevant feature to explain eye positions made on social scenes, even dynamic ones. Finally, we propose groundwork for an audiovisual saliency model.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audiovisual integration; database; expectation-maximization; faces; gaze; saliency; scanpath; speech

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993019     DOI: 10.1167/14.8.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  17 in total

1.  A model of face selection in viewing video stories.

Authors:  Yuki Suda; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Individual differences in responsivity to social rewards: Insights from two eye-tracking tasks.

Authors:  Bhismadev Chakrabarti; Anthony Haffey; Loredana Canzano; Christopher P Taylor; Eugene McSorley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Preferential Processing of Social Features and Their Interplay with Physical Saliency in Complex Naturalistic Scenes.

Authors:  Albert End; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-30

4.  Scanpath modeling and classification with hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Antoine Coutrot; Janet H Hsiao; Antoni B Chan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-02

5.  Social content and emotional valence modulate gaze fixations in dynamic scenes.

Authors:  Marius Rubo; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A free database of eye movements watching "Hollywood" videoclips.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-06-04

7.  Face perception influences the programming of eye movements.

Authors:  Louise Kauffmann; Carole Peyrin; Alan Chauvin; Léa Entzmann; Camille Breuil; Nathalie Guyader
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Viewing Complex, Dynamic Scenes "Through the Eyes" of Another Person: The Gaze-Replay Paradigm.

Authors:  Jennifer Choe Bush; Peter Christopher Pantelis; Xavier Morin Duchesne; Sebastian Alexander Kagemann; Daniel Patrick Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What is the role of the film viewer? The effects of narrative comprehension and viewing task on gaze control in film.

Authors:  John P Hutson; Tim J Smith; Joseph P Magliano; Lester C Loschky
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-11-22

10.  Semantic content outweighs low-level saliency in determining children's and adults' fixation of movies.

Authors:  Andrew T Rider; Antoine Coutrot; Elizabeth Pellicano; Steven C Dakin; Isabelle Mareschal
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.