John H Contois1, Andre L Albert2, Rae-Anne Nguyen2. 1. Sun Diagnostics, LLC, 60 Pineland Drive, Brunswick Hall, Suite 322, New Gloucester, ME 04260, USA. Electronic address: jcontois@sundiagnostics.us. 2. Sun Diagnostics, LLC, 60 Pineland Drive, Brunswick Hall, Suite 322, New Gloucester, ME 04260, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunoprecipitation (IP) of non-HDL particles with antisera provides the simplest and most specific method available for the separation of HDL. We compared the LipoSep™ IP reagent with the dextran sulfate/MgCl2 precipitation method (DS). METHODS: The IP reagent (200 μl) was added to an equal volume of serum, vortexed, incubated for 10 min at room temperature, and microcentrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. RESULTS: Equal volumes of a sample and the IP reagent precipitated apoB to 3.0 g/l without the coprecipitation of HDL. HDL-C measured in the supernatant after IP (Y) gave excellent agreement to DS precipitation (X) with a slope of 1.01, an intercept of 0.070 mmol/l (2.7 mg/dl), and a correlation of 0.99 (n=118; apoB 0.16-2.11 g/l). However, DS failed in most samples with moderate to elevated triglycerides. At triglyceride concentrations from 2.86 to 23.63 mmol/l (253-2091 mg/dl) the initial success rate was 65.4% for IP, while DS successfully precipitated only 5.8%. Success rate on repeat with additional reagent and/or sample dilution gave a success rate of 86.5% for IP and 40.4% for DS. CONCLUSION: The IP reagent and protocol is a simple, effective and highly specific tool for isolating HDL particles in human serum and is effective with high triglyceride samples.
BACKGROUND: Immunoprecipitation (IP) of non-HDL particles with antisera provides the simplest and most specific method available for the separation of HDL. We compared the LipoSep™ IP reagent with the dextran sulfate/MgCl2 precipitation method (DS). METHODS: The IP reagent (200 μl) was added to an equal volume of serum, vortexed, incubated for 10 min at room temperature, and microcentrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. RESULTS: Equal volumes of a sample and the IP reagent precipitated apoB to 3.0 g/l without the coprecipitation of HDL. HDL-C measured in the supernatant after IP (Y) gave excellent agreement to DS precipitation (X) with a slope of 1.01, an intercept of 0.070 mmol/l (2.7 mg/dl), and a correlation of 0.99 (n=118; apoB 0.16-2.11 g/l). However, DS failed in most samples with moderate to elevated triglycerides. At triglyceride concentrations from 2.86 to 23.63 mmol/l (253-2091 mg/dl) the initial success rate was 65.4% for IP, while DS successfully precipitated only 5.8%. Success rate on repeat with additional reagent and/or sample dilution gave a success rate of 86.5% for IP and 40.4% for DS. CONCLUSION: The IP reagent and protocol is a simple, effective and highly specific tool for isolating HDL particles in human serum and is effective with high triglyceride samples.
Authors: W Sean Davidson; Anna Heink; Hannah Sexmith; John T Melchior; Scott M Gordon; Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik; Laura Woollett; John R Barr; Jeffrey I Jones; Christopher A Toth; Amy S Shah Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 5.922